Dataset Information

Hospital Readmission of Adolescents and Young Adults With Complex Chronic Disease.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) who have complex chronic disease (CCD) are a growing population that requires hospitalization to treat severe, acute health problems. These patients may have increased risk of readmission as demands on their self-management increase and as they transfer care from pediatric to adult health care practitioners.

Objective

To assess variation across CCDs in the likelihood of readmission for AYA with increasing age.

Design, setting, and participants

Retrospective 1-year cross-sectional study of the 2014 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Nationwide Readmissions Database for all US hospitals. Participants were 215 580 hospitalized individuals aged 15 to 30 years with cystic fibrosis (n = 15 213), type 1 diabetes (n = 86 853), inflammatory bowel disease (n = 48 073), spina bifida (n = 7819), and sickle cell anemia (n = 57 622) from January 1, 2014, to December 1, 2014.

Exposures

Increasing age at index admission.

Main outcomes and measures

Unplanned 30-day hospital readmission. Readmission odds were compared by patients' ages in 2-year epochs (with age 15-16 years as the reference) using logistic regression, accounting for confounding patient characteristics and data clustering by hospital.

Results

Of 215 580 participants, 115 982 (53.8%) were female; the median (interquartile range) age was 24 (20-27) years. Across CCDs, multimorbidity was common; the percentages of index hospitalizations with 4 or more coexisting conditions ranged from to 33.4% for inflammatory bowel disease to 74.2% for spina bifida. Thirty-day hospital readmission rates varied significantly across CCDs: 20.2% (cystic fibrosis), 19.8% (inflammatory bowel disease), 20.4% (spina bifida), 22.5% (type 1 diabetes), and 34.6% (sickle cell anemia). As age increased from 15 to 30 years, unadjusted, 30-day, unplanned hospital readmission rates increased significantly for all 5 CCD cohorts. In multivariable analysis, age trends in the adjusted odds of readmission varied across CCDs. For example, for AYA who had cystic fibrosis, the adjusted odds of readmission increased to 1.9 (95% CI, 1.5-2.3) by age 21 years and remained elevated through age 30 years. For AYA who had type 1 diabetes, the adjusted odds of readmission peaked at ages 23 to 24 years (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.1-2.6) and then declined through age 30 years.

Conclusions and relevance

These findings suggest that hospitalized AYA who have CCDs have high rates of multimorbidity and 30-day readmission. The adjusted odds of readmission for AYA varied significantly across CCDs with increasing age. Further attention is needed to hospital discharge care, self-management, and prevention of readmission in AYA with CCD.

SUBMITTER: Dunbar P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6659144 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWith the large amount of material that is readily available on the internet, there are endless opportunities for electronic health-literate patients to obtain and learn new information. Although novel, a Web- or mobile-based program can be a powerful way to engage adolescents and young adults (AYAs). The ongoing engagement of AYAs with chronic disease is vital not only to empower them but also to ensure a smooth transition from pediatric to adult health care.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the current evidence on Web- or mobile-based interventions designed for AYAs.MethodsThis review was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42018096487. A systematic search of MEDLINE Complete, EMBASE, and CINAHL Complete was conducted on April 10, 2019, for studies that examined the perspectives of transition-age patients about technology-based interventions, the process involved in intervention development, or the evaluation of intervention efficacy. For each study, the comprehensiveness of reporting was appraised. The Downs and Black checklist was used for intervention efficacy trials, the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used for qualitative work, and a 16-item tool developed by Tong et al was used for questionnaire research.ResultsThe search uncovered 29 relevant studies, which included qualitative studies (n=14), intervention efficacy studies (n=7), questionnaire studies (n=4), mixed qualitative and questionnaire studies (n=2), and a mixed qualitative and pilot randomized controlled trial study (n=1). The reporting comprehensiveness score of questionnaires was rated considerably lower (n=6, 13%-57% [2/16-8/14]) than the scores of intervention efficacy trials (n=8, 48%-85% [13/27-23/27]) and qualitative research (n=17, 40%-93% [8.5/21-19.5/21]). AYAs were receptive to obtaining information via a website or mobile app. An intervention was more likely to be perceived as useful by AYAs when there was a concerted effort to involve AYAs and subject matter experts in the process of intervention design, as opposed to relying solely on the AYAs or the experts alone. The preferred medium of intervention delivery varied greatly for AYAs, ranging from static text to audiovisual materials. However, AYAs considered being concise was the most important aspect. Across different conditions, AYAs were interested in receiving information on diverse topics, such as anxiety and stress management, dealing with insurance, and having social relationships. Patients also requested for disease-specific information, such as weather forecasts and pollen levels for patients with asthma and information related to the pretransplant period for organ transplant recipients. Meta-analyses showed no significant group differences across time on quality of life, self-efficacy, and self-management.ConclusionsOwing to the lack of intervention efficacy trials, no conclusion can be drawn if an intervention delivered via a mobile app is better than that delivered via a website. However, through this systematic review, it is confirmed that AYAs were receptive to receiving medical information electronically.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Up to one-third of adolescents and young adults (11-21 years old) with chronic kidney disease exhibit suboptimal rates of adherence to renal-protective antihypertensive medications. Mobile health interventions may promote higher adherence to these medicines in these individuals, but empirical research is needed to inform best practices for applying these modalities. OBJECTIVE:In this multiphase investigation, we developed and tested a theoretically informed text messaging intervention based on the COM-B model, a well-established health intervention framework stating that capability, opportunity, and motivation interactively modify health behaviors, to improve participants' antihypertensive medication adherence in a pilot randomized controlled trial. Qualitative data on user experiences were obtained. METHODS:In phase 1, intervention messages (Reminder+COM-B Message) were developed via stakeholder engagement of participants and pediatric nephrologists. In phase 2, the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention was tested against a Reminder-only Message active control condition in an 8-week pilot randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome was daily electronically monitored antihypertensive medication adherence and secondary outcomes included pre-post participant surveys of adherence self-efficacy, adherence barriers, outcome expectancies for taking medicine, and motivation for and importance of taking medicine. In phase 3, qualitative interviews related to user experiences were conducted with participants in the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention group. RESULTS:Following phase 1, 34 participants (mean age 16.59 years, 41% female, 38% African American/Black, 35% hypertension diagnosis) completed the phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial (n=18 in the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention group, n=16 in the Reminder-only Message active control group). All participants in the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention group completed a phase 3 qualitative interview. Overall, study procedures were feasible and the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention was acceptable to the participants (eg, 15/18 participants reported reading the majority of messages sent to them, 0/18 reported that the messages reduced their desire to take medicine). Prerandomization, there were no significant group differences in the rate of change in daily adherence over time. However, postrandomization, there was a significant group by time interaction (B=.01, P=.04) in which daily adherence decreased significantly over time in the Reminder-only Message active control group but remained stable in the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention group. There were no significant differences between groups in pre-post changes in survey responses. Qualitative interviews revealed participants' perceptions of how the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention changed adherence behavior and highlighted several areas for improving the intervention (eg, adapt messaging timing, intensity, and content to match daily adherence, send praise when medicine is taken). CONCLUSIONS:The Reminder+COM-B Message intervention was feasible and acceptable to adolescents/young adults and demonstrated potential to promote participants' daily medication adherence beyond simple reminders. Further research is needed to determine the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention's mechanisms of adherence behavior change and to incorporate qualitative participant feedback into a modified version of this intervention to enhance its acceptability. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03651596; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03651596.