Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Models of effectiveness of interventions against malaria transmitted by Anopheles albimanus.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Most impact prediction of malaria vector control interventions has been based on African vectors. Anopheles albimanus, the main vector in Central America and the Caribbean, has higher intrinsic mortality, is more zoophilic and less likely to rest indoors. Therefore, relative impact among interventions may be different. Prioritizing interventions, in particular for eliminating Plasmodium falciparum from Haiti, should consider local vector characteristics.

Methods

Field bionomics data of An. albimanus from Hispaniola and intervention effect data from southern Mexico were used to parameterize mathematical malaria models. Indoor residual spraying (IRS), insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), and house-screening were analysed by inferring their impact on the vectorial capacity in a difference-equation model. Impact of larval source management (LSM) was assumed linear with coverage. Case management, mass drug administration and vaccination were evaluated by estimating their effects on transmission in a susceptible-infected-susceptible model. Analogous analyses were done for Anopheles gambiae parameterized with data from Tanzania, Benin and Nigeria.

Results

While LSM was equally effective against both vectors, impact of ITNs on transmission by An. albimanus was much lower than for An. gambiae. Assuming that people are outside until bedtime, this was similar for the impact of IRS with dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) or bendiocarb, and impact of IRS was less than that of ITNs. However, assuming people go inside when biting starts, IRS had more impact on An. albimanus than ITNs. While house-screening had less impact than ITNs or IRS on An. gambiae, it had more impact on An. albimanus than ITNs or IRS. The impacts of chemoprevention and chemotherapy were comparable in magnitude to those of strategies against An. albimanus. Chemo-prevention impact increased steeply as coverage approached 100%, whilst clinical-case management impact saturated because of remaining asymptomatic infections.

Conclusions

House-screening and repellent IRS are potentially highly effective against An. albimanus if people are indoors during the evening. This is consistent with historical impacts of IRS with DDT, which can be largely attributed to excito-repellency. It also supports the idea that housing improvements have played a critical role in malaria control in North America. For elimination planning, impact estimates need to be combined with feasibility and cost-analysis.

SUBMITTER: Briet OJT 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6670173 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Models of effectiveness of interventions against malaria transmitted by Anopheles albimanus.

Briët Olivier J T OJT   Impoinvil Daniel E DE   Chitnis Nakul N   Pothin Emilie E   Lemoine Jean Frantz JF   Frederic Joseph J   Smith Thomas A TA  

Malaria journal 20190801 1


<h4>Background</h4>Most impact prediction of malaria vector control interventions has been based on African vectors. Anopheles albimanus, the main vector in Central America and the Caribbean, has higher intrinsic mortality, is more zoophilic and less likely to rest indoors. Therefore, relative impact among interventions may be different. Prioritizing interventions, in particular for eliminating Plasmodium falciparum from Haiti, should consider local vector characteristics.<h4>Methods</h4>Field b  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3442982 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6676525 | biostudies-other
| PRJNA498101 | ENA
| PRJNA512122 | ENA
| PRJNA67289 | ENA
| S-EPMC6970940 | biostudies-literature
2022-04-20 | GSE198665 | GEO
| S-EPMC3536983 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8892392 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4361554 | biostudies-literature