Dataset Information

Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Previous studies comparing primary tumor resection (PTR) to palliative treatment for advanced-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) were limited by strong selection bias. We used multiple methods to control for confounding and selection bias to estimate the effect of PTR on survival for late-stage PDA.

Methods

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registry database for 2004 through 2014 was retrieved for the present study. A total of 4322 patients with stage III (AJCC, 6th) PDA were included in this study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to eliminate possible bias. In addition, instrumental variable (IV) analysis was utilized to adjust for both measured and unmeasured confounders.

Results

A total of 4322 patients with stage III PDA including 552 (12.8%) who underwent PTR, 3770 (87.2%) without PTR, were identified. In the multivariable cohort, a clear prognostic advantage of PTR was observed in overall survival (OS) (P?ConclusionsSurvival with PTR did not differ significantly from palliative treatment in marginal patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma. High-quality randomized trials are needed to validate these results.

SUBMITTER: Sun K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6676580 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Sun Ke K Li Wei W Han Jun J Wu Hong H

BMC cancer 20190801 1

<h4>Background</h4>Previous studies comparing primary tumor resection (PTR) to palliative treatment for advanced-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) were limited by strong selection bias. We used multiple methods to control for confounding and selection bias to estimate the effect of PTR on survival for late-stage PDA.<h4>Methods</h4>Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registry database for 2004 through 2014 was retrieved for the present study. A total of 4322 patients ...[more]

PMID: 31370893

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough the safety of combination chemotherapy without primary tumor resection (PTR) in patients with stage IV colon cancer has been established, questions remain regarding a potential survival benefit with PTR. The objective of this study was to compare mortality rates in patients who had colon cancer with unresectable metastases who did and did not undergo PTR.MethodsAn observational cohort study was conducted among patients with unresectable metastatic colon cancer identified from the National Cancer Data Base (2003-2005). Multivariate Cox regression analyses with and without propensity score weighting (PSW) were performed to compare survival outcomes. Instrumental variable analysis, using the annual hospital-level PTR rate as the instrument, was used to account for treatment selection bias. To account for survivor treatment bias, in situations in which patients might die soon after diagnosis from different reasons, a landmark method was used.ResultsIn the total cohort, 8641 of 15,154 patients (57%) underwent PTR, and 73.8% of those procedures (4972 of 6735) were at landmark. PTR was associated with a significant reduction in mortality using Cox regression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.47) or PSW (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0. 44-0.49). However, instrumental variable analysis revealed a much smaller effect (relative mortality rate, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96). Although a smaller benefit was observed with the landmark method using Cox regression (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.55-0.64) and PSW (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.54-0.64), instrumental variable analysis revealed no survival benefit (relative mortality rate, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.87-1.06).ConclusionsAmong patients with unresectable metastatic colon cancer, after adjustment for confounder effects, PTR was not associated with improved survival compared with systemic chemotherapy; therefore, routine noncurative PTR is not recommended. Cancer 2017;123:1124-1133. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Project description:Background The prognostic prolongation effect of surgical resection in the management of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) with distant metastases was still uncertain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of primary tumor resection (PTR) with outcomes in patients with stage IV GNEC. Methods This retrospective study analyzed patients with distant metastatic GNEC diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 and identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were divided into PTR and non-PTR groups. The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce the selection bias. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Cox-regression analyses (uni- and multivariate) were performed to evaluate factors potentially influencing survival. Results A total of 126 patients with a median follow-up of 79 months were identified. Forty-four patients underwent PTR and 82 patients did not undergo surgery. After the IPTW approach, PTR improved the OS in patients with stage IV GNEC (median OS 12 vs. 6 months, P = 0.010). The 1- and 3-year OS for patients with or without PTR were 43.8% and 34.5%, and 27.9% and 6.5%, respectively. The median CSS was 12 months for patients undergoing PTR and 6 months for those who did not. The 1 and 3-year CSS for patients with or without PTR were 45.1% and 37.0%, and 27.9% and 6.5%, respectively. In IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, PTR was recognized as an independent factor for improved survival after the occurrence of distant metastatic disease [OS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.305; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.196, 0.475; and CSS: HR = 0.278; 95% CI: 0.171, 0.452]. Conclusion PTR for stage IV GNEC contributes to a better prognosis compared with non-surgery. This study supported the resection of the primary tumor in patients with distant metastatic GNEC.

Project description:Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a disease with a very unfavorable prognosis. Surgical resection represents the only potentially curative treatment option, but recurrence after complete resection is almost certain. In an exploratory attempt we here aimed at identifying preoperative plasma protein biomarkers with the potential to predict early recurrence after resection of PDAC. Peripheral blood samples from 14 PDAC patients divided into three groups according to their time to tumor recurrence after curatively intended resection (early: < 6 months, medium: 6-12 months, late: > 12 months) underwent targeted proteome analysis. Proteins most strongly discriminating early and late recurrence were then examined in a number of established PDAC cell lines and their culture supernatants. Finally, PDAC organoid lines from primary tumors of patients with early and late recurrence were analyzed for confirmation and validation of results. In total, 23 proteins showed differential abundance in perioperative plasma from PDAC patients with early recurrence when compared to patients with late recurrence. Following confirmation of expression on a transcriptional and translational level in PDAC cell lines we further focused on three upregulated (MAEA, NT5E, AZU1) and two downregulated proteins (ATP6AP2, MICA). Increased expression of NT5E was confirmed in a subset of PDAC organoid cultures from tumors with early recurrence. MICA expression was heterogeneous and ATP6AP2 levels were very similar in both organoids from early and late recurrent tumors. Most strikingly, we observed high MAEA expression in all tested PDAC (n = 7) compared to a non-cancer ductal organoid line. MAEA also demonstrated potential to discriminate early recurrence from late recurrence PDAC organoids. Our study suggests that identification of plasma protein biomarkers released by tumor cells may be feasible and of value to predict the clinical course of patients. Prediction of recurrence dynamics would help to stratify up-front resectable PDAC patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy approaches in an individualized fashion. Here, MAEA and NT5E were the most promising candidates for further evaluation.

Dataset Information

Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Background

Methods

Results

Publications

Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets