Dataset Information

Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing globally and there is critical need develop interventions to improve health outcomes among older people. The Group Appointments in Primary Care (GAP) study was a randomised controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of a group and team-based medical visit programme to lower haemoglobin A1c among patients with T2DM. We aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators to implement the GAP intervention within a primary care setting, with an emphasis on patient experience. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:This was a qualitative exploratory study. Data were gathered from semistructured interviews conducted with the first cohort of GAP study participants (n=15) at baseline and intervention completion. GAP participants were aged >65, diagnosed with T2DM and from one primary care clinic. The interview questions identified the patient perspectives and factors relating to their attendance at seven group medical visits that were part of the intervention programme. Data were analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS:We identified four themes that captured participants' experiences: (1) Education: learning with professionals, learning with one another; (2) Social Support: common interests, common problems; (3) Setting: ease of location, ease of conversation and (4) Impact: expectations met, empowerment gained. The GAP intervention increased participants' self-reported diabetes literacy and self-management skills. CONCLUSIONS:We learnt that: accessible community centres, not primary care offices, were the ideal location for GAP; the consistent leadership of the primary care physician was valued by participants; and, the content related to exercise and healthy diet were viewed as impactful. Also, learning was achieved through content delivered by clinical experts, and by T2DM experts with lived experience-the GAP peers. Our findings highlight the important role of group learning. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT02002143.

SUBMITTER: Sims Gould J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6687023 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Sims Gould Joanie J Tong Catherine C Ly Jessica J Vazirian Sara S Windt Adriaan A Khan Karim K

BMJ open 20190802 8

<h4>Objective</h4>The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing globally and there is critical need develop interventions to improve health outcomes among older people. The Group Appointments in Primary Care (GAP) study was a randomised controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of a group and team-based medical visit programme to lower haemoglobin A1c among patients with T2DM. We aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators to implement the GAP intervention within a p ...[more]

PMID: 31377711

Similar Datasets

Project description:To assess safety and efficacy of saxagliptin in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from older patients (?65 years of age) from five 24-week phase III trials: three studies of saxagliptin versus placebo as an add-on therapy to metformin, glyburide, or a thiazolidinedione; and two studies of saxagliptin versus placebo as monotherapy in drug-naïve patients. Separate analyses were conducted on one study of initial combination therapy with saxagliptin plus metformin versus metformin monotherapy in drug-naïve patients. The safety analysis population for the five-study pool included 428 patients ? 65 years of age with baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) 7.0% to 10.5% who received saxagliptin 2.5 or 5 mg or placebo, and for the study of initial combination therapy included 69 patients ? 65 years of age with baseline HbA(1c) 8.0% to 12.0% who received saxagliptin 5 mg in combination with metformin or metformin monotherapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline HbA(1c).In the five-study pool, the differences in the adjusted mean change from baseline HbA(1c) among older patients receiving saxagliptin versus placebo were -0.60% (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.99% to -0.21%) for saxagliptin 2.5 mg and -0.55% (-0.97% to -0.14%) for saxagliptin 5 mg; in the initial combination study, the difference was -1.22% (-2.27% to -0.17%) among older patients receiving saxagliptin 5 mg plus metformin versus metformin monotherapy. The results were generally similar in older and younger patients. Saxagliptin was well tolerated; the incidence and types of adverse events were similar for saxagliptin and comparators. Hypoglycemia was reported in 3.0% to 9.4% of patients receiving saxagliptin (0%-8.0% for comparators) and was confirmed (finger stick glucose ? 50 mg/dL, with associated symptoms) in 0% to 0.7% (0%-0.7% for comparators); hypoglycemic episodes did not vary by age category and did not require medical intervention.Saxagliptin was effective and well tolerated, with a low risk of hypoglycemia, when used as monotherapy, add-on therapy, or initial combination therapy with metformin in older patients with T2DM.

Project description:Background and aimsAlthough type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) share many common pathological and physiological characteristics, there are few studies assessing the predictive capacity of novel biomarkers in occurrence and development of CAD in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years. In addition, T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years are prone to CAD. Therefore, it is of great significance to find novel biomarkers for the development CAD in T2DM.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 579 T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years were consecutively enrolled in this work, and 177 of whom had major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: cardiovascular or cerebrovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, coronary stent implantation, and stroke) during the follow up. Univariate and multivariate factors were employed to analyze the correlation between each variable and the occurrence of MACCE, and the Spearman's rank correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationships between Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (sdLDL-C). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was adopted to determine the predictive value of NGAL and sdLDL-C elevation for MACCE in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years.ResultsAfter a median 48 months follow-up [19, (10 ~ 32) ], the levels of NGAL, sdLDL-C, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), LDL-C, and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) were significantly higher while those of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A I (ApoA-I) were lower in MACCE positive group. NGAL correlated to body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.391, P = 0.001) and triglyceride (TG) (r = 0.228, P = 0.032), and high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) (r = 0.251, P = 0.007), and neutrophils (r = 0.454, P = 0.001), sdlDL-C level was found to be positively correlated with LDL-C (r = 0.413, P = 0.001), TG (r = 0.432, P = 0.001), and ApoB (r = 0.232, P = 0.002); and it was negatively correlated with HDL-C (r = -0.362, P = 0.031) and ApoA-I (r = -0.402, P = 0.001). Age-adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that NGAL (HR = 1.006, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005-1.008, P < 0.001) and sdLDL-C (HR = 1.052, 95% CI: 1.037-1.066, P < 0.001) were independently associated with occurrence of MACCE. ROC curve analysis showed that NGAL (area under ROC (AUC) = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75-0.84, P < 0.001) and sdlDL-C (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72-0.80, P < 0.001) could predict the occurrence of MACCE (area under ROC. NGAL combined with sdlDL-C could predict the occurrence of MACCE well (AUC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84-0.90, P < 0.001).ConclusionThe higher NGAL and sdLDL-C in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years were significantly and independently associated with the risk of MACCE, and showed higher clinical values than other lipid biomarkers or other chronic inflammation, so they were expected to be the most effective predictors of MACCE assessment.

Dataset Information

Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Publications

Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets