Dataset Information

Comparative study of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung carcinoma in high-grade neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: a large population-based study.

ABSTRACT: Background: In 2015, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) was removed from the large cell carcinoma group and classified with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) constituting two members of the high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lung. However, the difference between high-grade LCNEC and SCLC in terms of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis has not been fully understood owing to the rarity of LCNEC. Patients and methods: Patients with high-grade LCNEC and SCLC at initial diagnosis between 2001 and 2014 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database. Clinicopathological characteristics between high-grade LCNEC and SCLC were compared using the Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Differences in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared using the log-rank test, Cox models and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Results: A total of 1223 patients with high-grade LCNEC and 18182 patients with high-grade SCLC were enrolled. To the best of our knowledge, this study involved the largest number of high-grade LCNEC patients to date, with respect to a comparison between high-grade LCNEC and high-grade SCLC patients. There were significant differences in age, sex, race, laterality, SEER stage, nodal status, surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, but not marital status, between high-grade LCNEC and SCLC patients. High-grade LCNEC patients had a better OS and CSS than high-grade SCLC patients. Subgroup analysis also confirmed the better prognosis of the high-grade LCNEC patients in the regional stage, distant stage and surgery subgroups. However, no significant difference in prognosis was observed between the two non-surgery subgroups, which was confirmed using PSM analysis. Furthermore, high-grade LCNEC patients showed different metastatic patterns to high-grade SCLC patients. Conclusion: These results suggested that high-grade LCNEC and high-grade SCLC were different histological types, and that a detailed classification for high-grade NETs of the lung was needed.

SUBMITTER: Wang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6691699 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative study of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung carcinoma in high-grade neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: a large population-based study.

Wang Jian J Ye Ling L Cai Hui H Jin Meiling M

Journal of Cancer 20190710 18

<b>Background</b>: In 2015, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) was removed from the large cell carcinoma group and classified with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) constituting two members of the high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lung. However, the difference between high-grade LCNEC and SCLC in terms of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis has not been fully understood owing to the rarity of LCNEC. <b>Patients and methods</b>: Patients with high-grade LCNEC an ...[more]

PMID: 31413741

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundA bioinformatics approach identified antitumor effects of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinomas) (G3NEC) that was subsequently validated in preclinical models with a putative mechanism of action via inhibition of neuroendocrine signaling pathways. This study was undertaken to reposition the candidate TCA desipramine in a clinical trial in SCLC and G3NEC.MethodsIn this prospective, phase IIa intrapatient dose escalation clinical trial, patients were required to have failed at least one prior chemotherapy for metastatic SCLC or G3NEC. Treatment with desipramine began at 75 mg nightly with escalation in increments of 75 mg weekly to a maximum of 450 mg daily.ResultsSix patients were enrolled, 3 with SCLC, and 3 with G3NEC (lung, rectal, and pancreas). Tolerability of desipramine was worse than predicted. Of the 6 patients enrolled: 1 patient achieved 300 mg daily, 2 patients reached 150 mg daily, 1 patient reached 75 mg daily, and 2 patients were unable to tolerate any stable dose. Reasons for discontinuation included drug-related grade 3 colon pseudo-obstruction, unrelated GI bleed, and grade 1-2 neurocognitive adverse events. Median clinical or radiographic progression free survival was 1.2 months (range 0.2-3.3) and median overall survival from study entry was 2.7 months (range 1.3-5.6).ConclusionsNo clinical or radiographic benefit was observed using desipramine to treat SCLC and G3NEC, so this trial was terminated. Intolerable low and medium grade neurocognitive side effects led to intermittent treatment and early discontinuation in most patients; given this limitation, doses achieved may be inadequate compared to the preclinical studies.MicroabstractA bioinformatics approach previously identified a potential antitumor effect of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma) (G3NEC), which was validated in preclinical models. In this prospective, phase IIa clinical trial, patients were required to have failed at least one prior chemotherapy for metastatic SCLC or G3NEC (Ki-67 ≥ 20% or ≥ 20 mitoses/10 HPF). Treatment with desipramine began at 75 mg nightly with escalation by 75 mg weekly to a maximum dose of 450 mg daily. Six patients were enrolled on this clinical trial, 3 with SCLC, and 3 with G3NEC (lung, rectal, and pancreatic). Tolerability of desipramine was worse than predicted. In the 6 patients enrolled: 1 patient achieved 300 mg daily, 2 patients reached 150 mg daily, 1 patient reached 75 mg daily, and 2 patients were unable to tolerate any stable dose. Reasons for discontinuation included drug-related grade 3 colon pseudo-obstruction, unrelated GI bleed, and grade 1-2 drug related dizziness, confusion, and somnolence. Though numbers are small, median clinical or radiographic progression free survival was 1.2 months (range 0.2-3.3) and median overall survival from study entry was 2.7 months (range 1.3-5.6). Although preclinical evidence was promising, no clinical or radiographic benefit was observed using desipramine to treat SCLC and G3NEC, so this trial was terminated.

Dataset Information

Comparative study of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung carcinoma in high-grade neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: a large population-based study.

Publications

Comparative study of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung carcinoma in high-grade neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: a large population-based study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets