Dataset Information

Measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide in male patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Airway inflammation plays an important role in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); exhaled nitric oxide is regarded as a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and nasal nitric oxide (nNO) in patients with OSA.

Methods

Seventy-five patients with OSA and 30 health controls were enrolled in this study. FeNO and nNO were measured before and after sleep. Nasal lavage was performed in 31 non-smoking individuals immediately after NO measurement in the morning. The sample of nasal lavage was taken for cell classification and analyzing interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 8 (IL-8).

Results

Both FeNO and nNO were significantly higher in OSA (before sleep FeNO 21.08?±?8.79 ppb vs.16.90?±?6.86 ppb, p?=?0.022; after sleep FeNO 25.57?±?15.58 ppb vs.18.07?±?6.25 ppb, p?=?0.003; before sleep nNO 487.03?±?115.83 ppb vs. 413.37?±?73.10 ppb, p?=?0.001; after sleep nNO 550.07?±?130.24 ppb vs. 460.43?±?109.77 ppb, p?2); after sleep, nNO was also positively associated to recording time with SpO₂ 2. Both before and after sleep nNO levels were positively correlated with the percentage of neutrophils in nasal lavage (r?=?0.528, p?=?0.014; r?=?0.702, p?ConclusionThis study sustains the presence of airway inflammation in OSA patients with the increase of FeNO and nNO. The data suggests nNO might have greater value than FeNO since it positively correlated with OSA severity, and nNO is a potential bio-marker of nasal inflammation in non-smoking OSA patients.

SUBMITTER: Zhang D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6700235 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide in male patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Zhang Dongmei D Xiao Yi Y Luo Jinmei J Wang Xiaona X Qiao Yixian Y Huang Rong R Wu Wei W

Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung 20181212 3

<h4>Objective</h4>Airway inflammation plays an important role in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); exhaled nitric oxide is regarded as a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and nasal nitric oxide (nNO) in patients with OSA.<h4>Methods</h4>Seventy-five patients with OSA and 30 health controls were enrolled in this study. FeNO and nNO were measured before and after sleep. Nasal lavage was performed in 31 non-smoking i ...[more]

PMID: 30542936

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with adverse and interdependent cognitive and cardiovascular consequences. Increasing evidence suggests that nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and endothelin family (EDN) genes underlie mechanistic aspects of OSA-associated morbidities. We aimed to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the NOS family (3 isoforms), and EDN family (3 isoforms) to identify potential associations of these SNPs in children with OSA.MethodsA pediatric community cohort (ages 5-10 years) enriched for snoring underwent overnight polysomnographic (NPSG) and a fasting morning blood draw. The diagnostic criteria for OSA were an obstructive apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI) >2/h total sleep time (TST), snoring during the night, and a nadir oxyhemoglobin saturation <92%. Control children were defined as non-snoring children with AHI <2/h TST (NOSA). Endothelial function was assessed using a modified post-occlusive hyperemic test. The time to peak reperfusion (Tmax) was considered as the indicator for normal endothelial function (NEF; Tmax<45 sec), or ED (Tmax ≥ 45 sec). Genomic DNA from peripheral blood was extracted and allelic frequencies were assessed for, NOS1 (209 SNPs), NOS2 (122 SNPs), NOS3 (50 SNPs), EDN1 (43 SNPs), EDN2 (48 SNPs), EDN3 (14 SNPs), endothelin receptor A, EDNRA, (27 SNPs), and endothelin receptor B, EDNRB (23 SNPs) using a custom SNPs array. The relative frequencies of NOS-1,-2, and -3, and EDN-1,-2,-3,-EDNRA, and-EDNRB genotypes were evaluated in 608 subjects [128 with OSA, and 480 without OSA (NOSA)]. Furthermore, subjects with OSA were divided into 2 subgroups: OSA with normal endothelial function (OSA-NEF), and OSA with endothelial dysfunction (OSA-ED). Linkage disequilibrium was analyzed using Haploview version 4.2 software.ResultsFor NOSA vs. OSA groups, 15 differentially distributed SNPs for NOS1 gene, and 1 SNP for NOS3 emerged, while 4 SNPs for EDN1 and 1 SNP for both EDN2 and EDN3 were identified. However, in the smaller sub-group for whom endothelial function was available, none of the significant SNPs was retained due to lack of statistical power.ConclusionsDifferences in the distribution of polymorphisms among NOS and EDN gene families suggest that these SNPs could play a contributory role in the pathophysiology and risk of OSA-induced cardiovascular morbidity. Thus, analysis of genotype-phenotype interactions in children with OSA may assist in the formulation of categorical risk estimates.

Project description:BackgroundThe use of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has been proposed for identifying and monitoring eosinophilic airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To explore the clinical utility of FeNO in COPD, we aimed to assess its short-term variability in a clinically stable COPD cohort.MethodsConsecutive COPD patients, formerly smokers, underwent FeNO assessment at the baseline and six time-points through serial sampling spaced 3 days apart.ResultsA total of 41 patients (mean age 72.9, 87.8% males) showed a median baseline value of FeNO of 11.7 (8.0-16.8) ppb. A weak linear relationship was documented between baseline FeNO values and both eosinophil counts (r = 0.341, p = 0.029) and the percentage of eosinophils (r = 0.331, p = 0.034), confirmed in multiple linear regressions after adjusting for steroid use. The overall individual variability of FeNO between time-points was 3.90 (2.53-7.29) ppb, with no significant difference in the distribution of FeNO values measured at different time-points (p = 0.204). A total of 28 (68.3%) patients exhibited FeNO always below the 25 ppb cut-off at all determinations, while the remining 13 (31.7%) had at least one value above the established limit. Interestingly, none of these 13 participants had FeNO stably above 25 ppb, all showing at least one normal value during serial sampling. Compared to these patients with more fluctuating values, the 28 with stably normal FeNO only exhibited a significantly higher body weight (80.0 ± 18.2 kg vs. 69.0 ± 8.8 kg, p = 0.013) and body mass index (29.7 ± 6.5 kg/m2 vs. 25.9 ± 3.7 kg/m2, p = 0.026), confirmed in multiple logistic regressions after adjusting for major potential confounders.ConclusionsA certain degree of FeNO variability, apparently unrelated to eosinophil counts but somehow influenced by body weight, must be considered in COPD patients. Further studies are needed to clarify whether this biomarker may be effectively used to plan more personalized pharmacological and rehabilitation strategies in this clinical setting.

Dataset Information

Measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide in male patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Objective

Methods

Results

Publications

Measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide in male patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets