Dataset Information

Thrombophilia testing in the inpatient setting: impact of an educational intervention.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Thrombophilia testing is frequently ordered in the inpatient setting despite its limited impact on clinical decision-making and unreliable results in the setting of acute thrombosis or ongoing anticoagulation. We sought to determine the effect of an educational intervention in reducing inappropriate thrombophilia testing for hospitalized patients. METHODS:During the 2014 academic year, we implemented an educational intervention with a phase implementation design for Internal Medicine interns at Stanford University Hospital. The educational session covering epidemiology, appropriate thrombophilia evaluation and clinical rationale behind these recommendations. Their ordering behavior was compared with a contemporaneous control (non-medicine and private services) and a historical control (interns from prior academic year). From the analyzed data, we determined the proportion of inappropriate thrombophilia testing of each group. Logistic generalized estimating equations were used to estimate odds ratios for inappropriate thrombophilia testing associated with the intervention. RESULTS:Of 2151 orders included, 934 were deemed inappropriate (43.4%). The two intervention groups placed 147 orders. A pooled analysis of ordering practices by intervention groups revealed a trend toward reduction of inappropriate ordering (p =?0.053). By the end of the study, the intervention groups had significantly lower rates of inappropriate testing compared to historical or contemporaneous controls. CONCLUSION:A brief educational intervention was associated with a trend toward reduction in inappropriate thrombophilia testing. These findings suggest that focused education on thrombophilia testing can positively impact inpatient ordering practices.

SUBMITTER: Kwang H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6701078 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Thrombophilia testing in the inpatient setting: impact of an educational intervention.

Kwang Henry H Mou Eric E Richman Ilana I Kumar Andre A Berube Caroline C Kaimal Rajani R Ahuja Neera N Harman Stephanie S Johnson Tyler T Shah Neil N Witteles Ronald R Harrington Robert R Shieh Lisa L Hom Jason J

BMC medical informatics and decision making 20190820 1

<h4>Background</h4>Thrombophilia testing is frequently ordered in the inpatient setting despite its limited impact on clinical decision-making and unreliable results in the setting of acute thrombosis or ongoing anticoagulation. We sought to determine the effect of an educational intervention in reducing inappropriate thrombophilia testing for hospitalized patients.<h4>Methods</h4>During the 2014 academic year, we implemented an educational intervention with a phase implementation design for Int ...[more]

PMID: 31429747

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEven though it rarely influences venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and the fact that it is generally discouraged, thrombophilia testing is still largely prescribed. We assessed: 1) whether/how frequently Italian thrombosis centres requested thrombophilia testing; 2) what results were obtained; and 3) if the results affected treatment and clinical results.Materials and methodsWe examined data from 4,826 VTE patients enrolled by 19 clinical centres participating in the START 2-Register.Results57.2% of patients were tested. Numbers varied widely among centres (2.9-99.7%). Thrombophilic alterations were recorded in 18.2% of patients and the percentage of positive results was inversely correlated with that of patients tested. Significantly less patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were tested, whereas more were tested when the event was idiopathic, presenting as isolated pulmonary embolism (PE), or in unusual sites. Patients with thrombophilic alterations were younger, more frequently treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), with lower mortality and less frequently discontinued anticoagulation. DOACs were more frequently prescribed in patients with heterozygous Factor V (FV) Leiden or prothrombin mutations, whereas vitamin K antagonists were preferred in patients with inhibitor deficiencies, combined alterations or antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS). There was no difference in duration of treatment among those with or without alterations, though more APLS patients received an extended treatment course. Bleeding and thrombotic complications occurred with a similar and fairly low incidence in patients with or without thrombophilic alterations.DiscussionAlthough general testing for thrombophilia in VTE patients is currently discouraged, more than half of the VTE patients included in the START2-Register were tested. However, there were marked differences in practice between Italian thrombosis centres. About 60% of all patients with alterations were treated with DOACs, confirming that DOACs can be a useful option for treatment of thrombophilic VTE patients, with the exclusion of those with APLS.

Project description:PurposeThe objective of this study was to implement a standardized process across health systems to determine the prevalence and clinical relevance of prescribing errors intercepted by pharmacists.MethodsThis prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted across 11 hospitals. Pharmacist-intercepted prescribing errors were collected during inpatient order verification over 6 consecutive weeks utilizing a standardized documentation process. The potential harm of each error was evaluated using a modified National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC-MERP) index with physician validation, and errors were stratified into those with potentially low, serious, or life-threatening harm. Endpoints included the median error rate per 1,000 patient days, error type, and potential harm with correlating cost avoidance.ResultsPharmacists intervened on 7,187 errors, resulting in a mean error rate of 39 errors per 1,000 patient days. Among the errors, 46.6% (n = 3,349) were determined to have potentially serious consequences and 2.4% (n = 175) could have been life-threatening if not intercepted. This equates to $874,000 in avoided cost. The top 3 error types occurring with the highest frequency were "wrong dose/rate/frequency" (n = 2,298, 32.0%), "duplicate therapy" (n = 1,431, 19.9%), and "wrong timing" (n = 960, 13.4%). "Wrong dose/rate/frequency" (n = 49, 28%), "duplicate therapy" (n = 26, 14.9%), and "drug-disease interaction" (n = 24, 13.7%) errors occurred with the highest frequency among errors with potential for life-threatening harm. "Wrong dose/rate/frequency" (n = 1,028, 30.7%), "wrong timing" (n = 573, 17.1%), and "duplicate therapy" (n = 482, 14.4%) errors occurred with the highest frequency among errors with potentially serious harm.ConclusionDocumentation of pharmacist intervention on prescribing errors via a standardized process creates a platform for multicenter analysis of prescribing error trends and an opportunity for development of system-wide solutions to reduce potential harm from prescribing errors.

Project description:BackgroundThere is an increasing need for physical therapists to address psychosocial aspects of musculoskeletal pain. Psychologically informed practice is one way to deliver this type of care through the integration of biopsychosocial interventions into patient management. An important component of psychologically informed practice is patient centered communication. However, there is little research on how to effectively implement patient centered communication into pre-licensure training for physical therapists.MethodsThirty Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students took part in an educational intervention that consisted of one 4-h didactic teaching session and three 1-h experiential learning sessions. Prior to the first session, students performed an examination of a standardized patient with chronic low back pain and were assessed on psychologically informed physical therapy (PIPT) adherent behaviors via a rating scale. Students also completed the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS-PT). After the last experiential session, students evaluated another standardized patient and were reassessed on PIPT adherent behaviors. Students retook the PABS-PT and qualitative data was also collected.ResultsAfter the educational intervention, students had positive changes in their pain attitudes and belief scores indicating a stronger orientation toward a psychosocial approach to patient care (p < 0.05). Additionally, after the intervention, students showed improvements in their adherence to using PIPT behaviors in their simulated patient interactions (p < 0.05). Qualitatively, students reported a high acceptability of the educational intervention with common themes indicating improved confidence with treating and communicating with complex patients.ConclusionStudents had attitudes and beliefs shift towards a more psychosocial orientation and demonstrated improved PIPT behaviors in simulated patient interactions after a brief educational intervention. Future research should investigate best practices for implementation of psychologically informed physical therapy for licensed clinicians.

Dataset Information

Thrombophilia testing in the inpatient setting: impact of an educational intervention.

Publications

Thrombophilia testing in the inpatient setting: impact of an educational intervention.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets