Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
Traditionally, the absence of insulin resistance risk factors (IRRFs) was considered a low risk for insulin resistance (IR). However, IR also existed in certain individuals without IRRFs; thus this study aims to explore predictors of IR targeted at the population without IRRFs.Design
Cross-sectional survey.Setting
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Participants
Participants without regular IRRFs (IRRF-Free, n=2478) and a subgroup without optimal IRRFs (IRRF-Optimal, n=1414) were involved in this study.Primary and secondary outcome measure
IRRFs and the optimal cut-off value of triglyceride (TG) to predict IR.Results
Overall, the prevalence of IR was 6.9% and 5.7% in the IRRF-Free group and the IRRF-Optimal group, respectively. TG and waist circumference were independently associated with the prevalence of IR in both the groups (OR=1.010?to 10.20; p<0.05 for all), where TG was positively associated with IR. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of TG was 0.7016 (95% CI: 0.7013 to 0.7018) and 0.7219 (95% CI: 0.7215 to 0.7222), and the optimal cut-off value of TG to predict IR was 79.5?mg/dL and 81.5?mg/dL in the IRRF-Free group and the IRRF-Optimal group, respectively.Conclusion
There is an association between TG and IR even in the normal range of TG concentration. Therefore, normal TG could be used as an important indicator to predict the prevalence of IR in the absence of IRRFs.
SUBMITTER: Bi C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6701626 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Bi Chunli C Wang Lijuan L Sun Chong C Sun Mengzi M Zheng Pingping P Xue Zhiqiang Z Shen Li L Pan Pan P Li Jiagen J Lv Yaogai Y Zhang Anning A Li Bo B Zhang Xinyao X Yao Yan Y Jin Lina L
BMJ open 20190810 8
<h4>Objective</h4>Traditionally, the absence of insulin resistance risk factors (IRRFs) was considered a low risk for insulin resistance (IR). However, IR also existed in certain individuals without IRRFs; thus this study aims to explore predictors of IR targeted at the population without IRRFs.<h4>Design</h4>Cross-sectional survey.<h4>Setting</h4>National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.<h4>Participants</h4>Participants without regular IRRFs (IRRF-Free, n=2478) and a subgroup without op ...[more]