Dataset Information

Experience with key indicator cases among otolaryngology residents.

ABSTRACT: Objective:To describe the resident experience with respect to key indicator cases for each year of training. Study Design:Multi-institution, cross-sectional assessment. Methods:Using an electronic survey, current otolaryngology residents were solicited to complete a survey regarding their experiences with the key indicator cases to that point. The survey was sent to this cohort in the winter of 2017-2018. Results:Three hundred and three residents responded, with 293 completing the survey. Twenty-three percent were PGY1, 19% PGY2, 21% PGY3, 18% PGY4, and 19% PGY5 or higher. The majority of residents progress from resident assistant as a PGY2, to resident surgeon as a PGY3 and self-assessed competent surgeon as a PGY4 for the majority of the key indicator cases. Less than 50% of the surveyed PGY5 residents had reached independent practice in all the key indicator cases, with stapedectomy (16%), rhinoplasty (18%), and paramedian forehead flap (14.5%) being the cases least frequently performed independently. Ninety-five percent of the respondent residents felt their program provided adequate training, but 20% of the respondents were either unsure or believed that they would be unable to perform all the key indicator cases by the completion of their training. Conclusions:The majority of otolaryngology residents feel confident in their training, but experience with certain cases lags behind and may not currently be taught as resident level cases. These findings raise the question of whether the current key indicator cases are the best option for assessing breadth and depth of residency training. Level of Evidence:NA.

SUBMITTER: O'Brien DC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6703116 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Experience with key indicator cases among otolaryngology residents.

O'Brien Daniel C DC Kellermeyer Brian B Chung Jeffson J Carr Michele M MM

Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology 20190717 4

<h4>Objective</h4>To describe the resident experience with respect to key indicator cases for each year of training.<h4>Study design</h4>Multi-institution, cross-sectional assessment.<h4>Methods</h4>Using an electronic survey, current otolaryngology residents were solicited to complete a survey regarding their experiences with the key indicator cases to that point. The survey was sent to this cohort in the winter of 2017-2018.<h4>Results</h4>Three hundred and three residents responded, with 293 ...[more]

PMID: 31453346

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportancePhotographic nasal analysis constitutes a critical step along the path toward accurate diagnosis and precise surgical planning in rhinoplasty. The learned process by which one assesses photographs, analyzes relevant anatomical landmarks, and generates a global view of the nasal aesthetic is less widely described.ObjectivesTo discern the common pitfalls in performing photographic nasal analysis and to quantify the utility of a systematic approach model in teaching photographic nasal analysis to otolaryngology residents.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective observational study included 20 participants from a university-based otolaryngology residency program. The control and intervention groups underwent baseline graded assessment of 3 patients. The intervention group received instruction on a systematic approach model for nasal analysis, and both groups underwent postintervention testing at 10 weeks. Data were collected from October 1, 2015, through June 1, 2016.InterventionA 10-minute, 11-slide presentation provided instruction on a systematic approach to nasal analysis to the intervention group.Main outcomes and measuresGraded photographic nasal analysis using a binary 18-point system.ResultsThe 20 otolaryngology residents (15 men and 5 women; age range, 24-34 years) were adept at mentioning dorsal deviation and dorsal profile with focused descriptions of tip angle and contour. Areas commonly omitted by residents included verification of the Frankfort plane, position of the lower lateral crura, radix position, and ratio of the ala to tip lobule. The intervention group demonstrated immediate improvement after instruction on the teaching model, with the mean (SD) postintervention test score doubling compared with their baseline performance (7.5 [2.7] vs 10.3 [2.5]; P < .001). At 10 weeks after the intervention, the mean comparative improvement in overall graded nasal analysis was 17% (95% CI, 10%-23%; P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceOtolaryngology residents demonstrated proficiency at incorporating nasal deviation, tip angle, and dorsal profile contour into their nasal analysis. They often omitted verification of the Frankfort plane, position of lower lateral crura, radix depth, and ala-to-tip lobule ratio. Findings with this novel 10-minute teaching model should be validated at other teaching institutions, and the instruction model should be further enhanced to teach more sophisticated analysis to residents as they proceed through training.Level of evidenceNA.

Dataset Information

Experience with key indicator cases among otolaryngology residents.

Publications

Experience with key indicator cases among otolaryngology residents.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure