Dataset Information

Optimal treatment for spermatogenesis in male patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:To compare the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse subcutaneous infusion with combined human chorionic gonadotropin and human menopausal gonadotropin (HCG/HMG) intramuscular injection have been performed to treat male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) spermatogenesis. METHODS:In total, 220 idiopathic/isolated HH patients were divided into the GnRH pulse therapy and HCG/HMG combined treatment groups (n?=?103 and n?=?117, respectively). The luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were monitored in the groups for the 1st week and monthly, as were the serum total testosterone level, testicular volume and spermatogenesis rate in monthly follow-up sessions. RESULTS:In the GnRH group and HCG/HMG group, the testosterone level and testicular volume at the 6-month follow-up session were significantly higher than were those before treatment. There were 62 patients (62/117, 52.99%) in the GnRH group and 26 patients in the HCG/HMG (26/103, 25.24%) group who produced sperm following treatment. The GnRH group (6.2?±?3.8 months) had a shorter sperm initial time than did the HCG/HMG group (10.9?±?3.5 months). The testosterone levels in the GnRH and HCG/HMG groups were 9.8?±?3.3?nmol/L and 14.8?±?8.8?nmol/L, respectively. CONCLUSION:The GnRH pulse subcutaneous infusion successfully treated male patients with HH, leading to earlier sperm production than that in the HCG/HMG-treated patients. GnRH pulse subcutaneous infusion is a preferred method.

SUBMITTER: Lin J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6709243 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Optimal treatment for spermatogenesis in male patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Lin Jianli J Mao Jiangfeng J Wang Xi X Ma Wanlu W Hao Ming M Wu Xueyan X

Medicine 20190801 31

<h4>Background</h4>To compare the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse subcutaneous infusion with combined human chorionic gonadotropin and human menopausal gonadotropin (HCG/HMG) intramuscular injection have been performed to treat male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) spermatogenesis.<h4>Methods</h4>In total, 220 idiopathic/isolated HH patients were divided into the GnRH pulse therapy and HCG/HMG combined treatment groups (n = 103 and n = 117, respectively). The luteiniz ...[more]

PMID: 31374027

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) caused by FGFR1 (fibroblast growth factor receptor 1) gene mutations and to evaluate the effect of gonadotropin or pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) therapy on spermatogenesis.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on CHH patients admitted to Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2012 to March 2020. Clinical features and laboratory results were recorded. Testicular volume and sperm count responding to gonadotropin and pulsatile GnRH therapy were compared between the FGFR1 mutation group and the mutation-negative group.Results(1) FGFR1 mutation group included 14 patients who received sperm-induction therapy, and the mutation-negative group enrolled 25 CHH patients. (2) The incidence of cryptorchidism was 50.0% (7/14) and 12.0% (3/25) in the FGFR1 group and the mutation-negative group, respectively (p=0.019). The baseline testicular volume of the FGFR1 mutation group was smaller than that of the mutation-negative group, 1.6 (0.5-2.0) mL vs. 2 (1.75-4) mL (p=0.033). The baseline luteinizing hormone (LH), Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone levels were similar between the two groups. (3) Using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests for the analysis of spermatogenesis, it was found that there was no significant difference in the first sperm appearance between the FGFR1 mutation group and the mutation-negative group (χ 2 = 1.974, p=0.160). The median time of spermatogenesis in the FGFR1 mutation group was longer than that in the mutation-negative group, 16 months vs. 10 months, respectively. The cumulative spermatogenesis success rate at 12 months in the FGFR1 mutation group (35.71%) was lower than that in the mutation-negative group (68.75%) (p=0.047). The sperm concentration in the mutation-negative group was more easily achieved for different thresholds compared with that in the FGFR1 mutation group, but no significant difference was observed (p > 0.05) between the two groups. The last follow-up examination showed that the testicular volume was 7.00 (4.75-12.00) mL and 10.56 ± 4.82 mL (p=0.098), the ejaculate volume of sperm was 2.20 (1.40-2.26) mL and 3.06 ± 1.42 mL (p=0.175), and the sperm concentration was 7.19 (1.00-9.91) million/mL and 18.80 (4.58-53.62) million/mL (p=0.038) in the FGFR1 mutation and mutation-negative groups, respectively, while the sperm motility (A%, A + B%, and A + B + C%) was similar for the two groups (p=0.839, 0.909, and 0.759, respectively). The testosterone level during treatment was 366.02 ± 167.03 ng/dL and 362.27 ± 212.86 ng/dL in the FGFR1 mutation and mutation-negative groups, respectively (p=0.956).ConclusionPatients with FGFR1 mutations have a higher prevalence of cryptorchidism and smaller testicular volume. Although patients with FGFR1 mutations have a similar rate of success for spermatogenesis compared to that of the mutation-negative patients, a longer treatment period was required and a lower sperm concentration was achieved.

Dataset Information

Optimal treatment for spermatogenesis in male patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Publications

Optimal treatment for spermatogenesis in male patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure