Dataset Information

Genomic selection on shelling percentage and other traits for maize.

ABSTRACT: Genomic selection (GS) is the one of the new method for molecular marker-assisted selection (MAS) that can improve selection efficiency and thereby accelerate selective breeding progress. In the present study, we used the exotic germplasm LK1 to improve the shelling percentage of Qi319 by GS. Genome-wide marker effects for each trait were estimated based on the performance of the testcross and SNP data for F2 progenies in the training population. The accuracy of genomic predictions was estimated as the correlation between marker-predicted genotypic values and phenotypic values of the testcrosses for each trait in the validation population. Our study result indicated that selection response for shell percentage was 33.7%, which is greater than those for grain yield, kernel number per ear, or grain moisture at harvest. Selection response for tassel branch number and weight per 100 kernels was greater than 60%. The Higher trait heritability resulted in better prediction efficiency; Prediction accuracy increased with the training population size; Prediction efficiency did not differ significantly between SNP densities of 1000 bp and 55,000 bp. The results of the present research project will provide a basis for genome-wide selection technology in maize breeding, and lay the groundwork for the application of GS to germplasms that are useful in China.

SUBMITTER: Sun Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6711738 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genomic selection on shelling percentage and other traits for maize.

Sun Qi Q Wang Ping P Li Wenlan W Li Wencai W Lu Shouping S Yu Yanli Y Zhao Meng M Meng Zhaodong Z

Breeding science 20190411 2

Genomic selection (GS) is the one of the new method for molecular marker-assisted selection (MAS) that can improve selection efficiency and thereby accelerate selective breeding progress. In the present study, we used the exotic germplasm LK1 to improve the shelling percentage of Qi319 by GS. Genome-wide marker effects for each trait were estimated based on the performance of the testcross and SNP data for F<sub>2</sub> progenies in the training population. The accuracy of genomic predictions wa ...[more]

PMID: 31481835

Similar Datasets

Project description:Genomic Selection (GS) has been proved to be a powerful tool for estimating genetic values in plant and livestock breeding. Newly developed sequencing technologies have dramatically reduced the cost of genotyping and significantly increased the scale of genotype data that used for GS. Meanwhile, state-of-the-art statistical methods were developed to make the best use of high marker density genotype data. In this study, 14 traits from four data sets of three species (maize, cattle, and pig) and five influential factors that affect the prediction accuracy were evaluated, including marker density (from 1 to ~600 k), statistical method (GBLUP-A, GBLUP-AD, and BayesR), minor allele frequency (MAF), heritability, and genetic architecture. Results indicate that in the GBLUP method, higher marker density leads to a higher prediction accuracy. In contrast, BayesR method needs more Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) iterations to reach the convergence and get reliable prediction values. BayesR outperforms GBLUP in predicting high or medium heritability trait that affected by one or several genes with large effects, while GBLUP performs similarly or slightly better than BayesR in predicting low heritability trait that controlled by a large amount of genes with minor effects. Prediction accuracy of trait with complex genetic architecture can be improved by increasing the marker density. Interestingly, for simple traits that controlled by one or several genes with large effects, higher marker density can cause a lower prediction accuracy if the QTN is included, but leads to a higher prediction accuracy if the QTN is excluded. The quantity of genetic markers with low MAF would not significantly affect the prediction accuracy of GBLUP, but results in a bad prediction accuracy performance of BayesR method. Compared with GBLUP-A, GBLUP-AD didn't show any advantages in capturing the non-additive variance for the traits with high heritability. The factors that affected prediction accuracy are discussed in this study and indicate that a combination of either GBLUP or BayesR method with moderate marker density and favorable polymorphism single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (~25 k SNPs) would always produce a good and stable prediction accuracy with acceptable breeding and computational costs.

Project description:BackgroundMaize is one of the most important staple crops and is widely grown throughout the world. Stalk lodging can cause enormous yield losses in maize production. However, rind penetrometer resistance (RPR), which is recognized as a reliable measurement to evaluate stalk strength, has been shown to be efficient and useful for improving stalk lodging-resistance. Linkage mapping is an acknowledged approach for exploring the genetic architecture of target traits. In addition, genomic selection (GS) using whole genome markers enhances selection efficiency for genetically complex traits. In the present study, two recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations were utilized to dissect the genetic basis of RPR, which was evaluated in seven growth stages.ResultsThe optimal stages to measure stalk strength are the silking phase and stages after silking. A total of 66 and 45 quantitative trait loci (QTL) were identified in each RIL population. Several potential candidate genes were predicted according to the maize gene annotation database and were closely associated with the biosynthesis of cell wall components. Moreover, analysis of gene ontology (GO) enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway further indicated that genes related to cell wall formation were involved in the determination of RPR. In addition, a multivariate model of genomic selection efficiently improved the prediction accuracy relative to a univariate model and a model considering RPR-relevant loci as fixed effects.ConclusionsThe genetic architecture of RPR is highly genetically complex. Multiple minor effect QTL are jointly involved in controlling phenotypic variation in RPR. Several pleiotropic QTL identified in multiple stages may contain reliable genes and can be used to develop functional markers for improving the selection efficiency of stalk strength. The application of genomic selection to RPR may be a promising approach to accelerate breeding process for improving stalk strength and enhancing lodging-resistance.

Project description:Genomic selection (GS) has been used to optimize genetic gains when phenotypic selection is considered costly and difficult to measure. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency and consistency of GS prediction for cassava yield traits (Manihot esculenta Crantz) using different methods, taking into account the effect of population structure. BLUPs and deregressed BLUPs were obtained for 888 cassava accessions and evaluated for fresh root yield, dry root yield and dry matter content in roots in 21 trials conducted from 2011 to 2016. The deregressed BLUPs obtained for the accessions from a 48K single nucleotide polymorphism dataset were used for genomic predictions based on the BayesB, BLASSO, RR-BLUP, G-BLUP and RKHS methods. The accessions' BLUPs were used in the validation step using four cross-validation strategies, taking into account population structure and different GS methods. Similar estimates of predictive ability and bias were identified for the different genomic selection methods in the first cross-validation strategy. Lower predictive ability was observed for fresh root yield (0.4569 -RR-BLUP to 0.4756-RKHS) and dry root yield (0.4689 -G-BLUP to 0.4818-RKHS) in comparison with dry matter content (0.5655 -BLASSO to 0.5670 -RKHS). However, the RKHS method exhibited higher efficiency and consistency in most of the validation scenarios in terms of prediction ability for fresh root yield and dry root yield. The correlations of the genomic estimated breeding values between the genomic selection methods were quite high (0.99-1.00), resulting in high coincidence of clone selection regardless of the genomic selection method. The deviance analyses within and between the validation clusters formed by the discriminant analysis of principal components were significant for all traits. Therefore, this study indicated that i) the prediction of dry matter content was more accurate compared to that of yield traits, possibly as a result of the smaller influence of non-additive genetic effects; ii) the RKHS method resulted in high and stable prediction ability in most of the validation scenarios; and iii) some kinship between the validation and training populations is desirable in order for genomic selection to succeed due to the significant effect of population structure on genomic selection predictions.

Dataset Information

Genomic selection on shelling percentage and other traits for maize.

Publications

Genomic selection on shelling percentage and other traits for maize.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets