Dataset Information

Molecular Diagnosis of Vaginitis: Comparing Quantitative PCR and Microbiome Profiling Approaches to Current Microscopy Scoring.

ABSTRACT: Vaginitis is often diagnosed by microscopy and limited to testing for bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis, and trichomoniasis. Approximately 10% of vaginal swabs are negative but designated "altered flora" by BV Nugent score, leaving clinicians unsure how to treat patients. Accurate and comprehensive vaginitis diagnostics are needed to direct treatment and reduce risks of recurrent or more severe infections. Vaginal swabs were collected from 93 women (mean age, 23.53 years; range, 18 to 42 years) in a cross-sectional study. Microscopy results for BV and Candida were compared to those from two molecular approaches: (i) a comprehensive quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay, including testing for aerobic vaginitis (AV), Candida, sexually transmitted infections (STI), and BV (Applied Biosystems) with an accompanying BV interpretive algorithm (Coriell Life Sciences), and (ii) microbiome profiling of the 16S rRNA gene (Illumina). Microscopy plus BV Nugent score had 76% overall agreement with the qPCR plus BV interpretive algorithm method (24 positive, 47 negative). OF the nine samples designated altered flora by Nugent, five were categorized BV positive and four were BV negative by the qPCR method. Although BV negative, 3/4 of the latter samples had positive AV targets with one also was STI positive. Microscopic identification of Candida versus that by qPCR had 94% agreement (9 positive, 78 negative). The comprehensive qPCR assay revealed alternative etiologies summarized as 38% BV, 10% AV, 5% Candida, 2% STI, 10% mixed infection (positive targets in multiple panels), and 35% negative for all targets. 16S microbiome analysis confirmed the bacterial qPCR results and identified differentiating patterns between AV, BV, and Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiomes.

SUBMITTER: Lynch T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6711928 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Molecular Diagnosis of Vaginitis: Comparing Quantitative PCR and Microbiome Profiling Approaches to Current Microscopy Scoring.

Lynch Tarah T Peirano Gisele G Lloyd Tracie T Read Ron R Carter Julia J Chu Angel A Shaman Jeffrey A JA Jarvis Joseph P JP Diamond Evan E Ijaz Umer Zeeshan UZ Church Deirdre D

Journal of clinical microbiology 20190826 9

Vaginitis is often diagnosed by microscopy and limited to testing for bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis, and trichomoniasis. Approximately 10% of vaginal swabs are negative but designated "altered flora" by BV Nugent score, leaving clinicians unsure how to treat patients. Accurate and comprehensive vaginitis diagnostics are needed to direct treatment and reduce risks of recurrent or more severe infections. Vaginal swabs were collected from 93 women (mean age, 23.53 years; range, ...[more]

PMID: 31315951

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveVaginitis may be diagnosed as bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis, or coinfection. A new molecular test assays the vaginal microbiome and organisms that cause three common infections. The objective of the trial was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of the investigational test for vaginal swabs collected by patients (self) or clinicians. The primary and secondary outcomes were to compare the investigational test with reference methods for the three most common causes of vaginitis and compare clinician-collected with self-collected swabs.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study in which women with symptoms of vaginitis were recruited at ten clinical centers and consented to the investigation between May and September 2015. The woman collected a vaginal swab, sheathed, and then handed it to the clinician. These swabs were to evaluate how self-collected swabs compared with clinician-collected swabs. The clinician collected an investigational test swab and reference test swabs. From 1,740 symptomatic patients, clinician-collected and self-collected vaginal swabs were evaluated by the molecular test and six tests. The reference methods for bacterial vaginosis were Nugent's score and Amsel's criteria for intermediate Nugent results. The reference methods for Candida infection were isolation of any potential Candida microorganisms from inoculation of two culture media: chromogenic and Sabouraud agar and sequencing. The reference methods for trichomoniasis were wet mount and culture.ResultsFor clinician-collected swabs, by reference methods, bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed in 56.5%, vaginal candidiasis in 32.8%, trichomoniasis in 8%, and none of the three infections in 24% with a coinfection rate of 20%. The investigational test sensitivity was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-92.2%) and specificity was 85.8% (95% CI 83.0-88.3%) for bacterial vaginosis. The investigational test sensitivity was 90.9% (95% CI 88.1-93.1%) and specificity was 94.1% (95% CI 92.6-95.4%) for the Candida group. Sensitivity for Candida glabrata was 75.9% (95% CI 57.9-87.8%) and specificity was 99.7% (95% CI 99.3-99.9%). Investigational test sensitivity was 93.1% (95% CI 87.4-96.3%) and specificity was 99.3% (95% CI 98.7-99.6%) for trichomoniasis. Results from self-collected swabs were similar to clinician-collected swabs.ConclusionA molecular-based test using vaginal swabs collected by clinicians or patients can accurately diagnose most common bacterial, fungal, and protozoan causes of vaginitis. Women and their clinicians seeking accurate diagnosis and appropriate selection of efficacious treatment for symptoms of vaginitis might benefit from this molecular test.

Dataset Information

Molecular Diagnosis of Vaginitis: Comparing Quantitative PCR and Microbiome Profiling Approaches to Current Microscopy Scoring.

Publications

Molecular Diagnosis of Vaginitis: Comparing Quantitative PCR and Microbiome Profiling Approaches to Current Microscopy Scoring.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets