Dataset Information

Clinicopathological and mutational analyses of colorectal cancer with mutations in the POLE gene.

ABSTRACT: Here, we investigated the clinicopathological and mutation profiles of colorectal cancer (CRC) with POLE mutations. Whole-exome sequencing was performed in 910 surgically resected primary CRCs. Tumors exceeding 500 counts of nonsynonymous single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were classified as hypermutators, whereas the remaining were classified as nonhypermutators. The hypermutators were subdivided into 2 groups. CRCs harboring more than 20% C-to-A and less than 3% C-to-G transversions were classified as POLE category tumors, whereas the remaining were classified as common-hypermutators. Gene expression profiling (GEP) analysis was performed in 892 (98.0%) tumors. Fifty-seven (6.3%) and 10 (1.1%) tumors were classified common-hypermutators and POLE category tumors, respectively. POLE category tumors harbored a significantly higher SNV count than common-hypermutators, and all POLE category tumors were associated with exonuclease domain mutations, such as P286R, F367C, V411L, and S297Y, in the POLE gene. Patients with POLE category tumors were significantly younger than those with nonhypermutators and common-hypermutators. All POLE mutations in the early-onset (age of onset ?50 years old) POLE category (7 tumors) were P286R mutations. GEP analysis revealed that PD-L1 and PD-1 gene expression levels were significantly increased in both common-hypermutators and POLE category tumors compared with those in nonhypermutators. CD8A expression was significantly upregulated in POLE category tumors compared with that in nonhypermutators. Thus, we concluded that CRCs with POLE proofreading deficiency had characteristics distinct from those of other CRCs. Analysis of POLE proofreading deficiency may be clinically significant for personalized management of CRCs.

SUBMITTER: Hino H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6712448 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinicopathological and mutational analyses of colorectal cancer with mutations in the POLE gene.

Hino Hitoshi H Shiomi Akio A Kusuhara Masatoshi M Kagawa Hiroyasu H Yamakawa Yushi Y Hatakeyama Keiichi K Kawabata Takanori T Oishi Takuma T Urakami Kenichi K Nagashima Takeshi T Kinugasa Yusuke Y Yamaguchi Ken K

Cancer medicine 20190625 10

Here, we investigated the clinicopathological and mutation profiles of colorectal cancer (CRC) with POLE mutations. Whole-exome sequencing was performed in 910 surgically resected primary CRCs. Tumors exceeding 500 counts of nonsynonymous single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were classified as hypermutators, whereas the remaining were classified as nonhypermutators. The hypermutators were subdivided into 2 groups. CRCs harboring more than 20% C-to-A and less than 3% C-to-G transversions were classi ...[more]

PMID: 31240875

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMutations in the POLE gene result in an ultra-hypermutated phenotype in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the molecular characterisation of epigenetic alterations remains unclear. We examined the genetic and epigenetic profiles of POLE-mutant CRC to elucidate the clinicopathological features of the associated genetic and epigenetic alterations.ResultsTumour tissues (1,013) obtained from a cohort of patients with CRC were analysed to determine associations between the proofreading domain mutations of POLE with various clinicopathological variables, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, BRAF and KRAS mutations, and the methylation status of key regions of MLH1, MGMT, and SFRP2 promoters by calculating the methylation scores (range 0-6). Only four cases (0.4%) exhibited pathogenic POLE hotspot mutations (two p.P286R [c.857C > G], one p.V411L [c.1231G > C], and p.S459F [c.1376C > T] each), which were mutually exclusive to BRAF and KRAS mutations and MSI. CRC patients were divided into four subgroups: patients with POLE mutations (POLE, 0.4%, n = 4), patients with both MSI and extensive methylation in MLH1 (MSI-M, 2.9%, n = 29), patients with MSI but no extensive methylation in MLH1 (MSI-U, 3.6%, n = 36), and patients without MSI (non-MSI, 93.2%, n = 944). The POLE group was younger at diagnosis (median 52 years, P < 0.0001), with frequent right-sided tumour localisation (frequency of tumours located in the right colon was 100%, 93.1%, 36.1%, and 29.9% in POLE, MSI-M, MSI-U, and non-MSI, respectively; P < 0.0001), and was diagnosed at an earlier stage (frequency of stages I-II was 100%, 72.4%, 77.8%, and 46.6% in POLE, MSI-M, MSI-U, and non-MSI, respectively, P < 0.0001). The mean methylation score in POLE was not different from that in MSI-U and non-MSI, but the methylation signature was distinct from that of the other subgroups. Additionally, although the examined number of POLE-mutant tumours was small, the number of CD8-positive cells increased in tumours with partial methylation in the MLH1 gene.ConclusionsCRC patients with POLE proofreading mutations are rare. Such mutations are observed in younger individuals, and tumours are primarily located in the right colon. Diagnosis occurs at an earlier stage, and distinct epigenetic alterations may be associated with CD8 cell infiltration.

Project description:BackgroundKRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 are established predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Previous studies suggest that KRAS codon 61 and 146 mutations may also predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. However, clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic features of colorectal carcinoma with KRAS codon 61 or 146 mutation remain unclear.MethodsWe utilized a molecular pathological epidemiology database of 1267 colon and rectal cancers in the Nurse's Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We examined KRAS mutations in codons 12, 13, 61 and 146 (assessed by pyrosequencing), in relation to clinicopathological features, and tumor molecular markers, including BRAF and PIK3CA mutations, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), LINE-1 methylation, and microsatellite instability (MSI). Survival analyses were performed in 1067 BRAF-wild-type cancers to avoid confounding by BRAF mutation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute mortality hazard ratio, adjusting for potential confounders, including disease stage, PIK3CA mutation, CIMP, LINE-1 hypomethylation, and MSI.ResultsKRAS codon 61 mutations were detected in 19 cases (1.5%), and codon 146 mutations in 40 cases (3.2%). Overall KRAS mutation prevalence in colorectal cancers was 40% (=505/1267). Of interest, compared to KRAS-wild-type, overall, KRAS-mutated cancers more frequently exhibited cecal location (24% vs. 12% in KRAS-wild-type; P?<?0.0001), CIMP-low (49% vs. 32% in KRAS-wild-type; P?<?0.0001), and PIK3CA mutations (24% vs. 11% in KRAS-wild-type; P?<?0.0001). These trends were evident irrespective of mutated codon, though statistical power was limited for codon 61 mutants. Neither KRAS codon 61 nor codon 146 mutation was significantly associated with clinical outcome or prognosis in univariate or multivariate analysis [colorectal cancer-specific mortality hazard ratio (HR)?=?0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI)?=?0.29-2.26 for codon 61 mutation; colorectal cancer-specific mortality HR?=?0.86, 95% CI?=?0.42-1.78 for codon 146 mutation].ConclusionsTumors with KRAS mutations in codons 61 and 146 account for an appreciable proportion (approximately 5%) of colorectal cancers, and their clinicopathological and molecular features appear generally similar to KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutated cancers. To further assess clinical utility of KRAS codon 61 and 146 testing, large-scale trials are warranted.

Dataset Information

Clinicopathological and mutational analyses of colorectal cancer with mutations in the POLE gene.

Publications

Clinicopathological and mutational analyses of colorectal cancer with mutations in the POLE gene.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure