Dataset Information

Adjusting selection bias in German health insurance records for regional prevalence estimation.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Regional prevalence estimation requires epidemiologic data with substantial local detail. National health surveys may lack in sufficient local observations due to limited resources. Therefore, corresponding prevalence estimates may not capture regional morbidity patterns with the necessary accuracy. Health insurance records represent alternative data sources for this purpose. Fund-specific member populations have more local observations than surveys, which benefits regional prevalence estimation. However, due to national insurance market regulations, insurance membership can be informative for morbidity. Regional fund-specific prevalence proportions are selective in the sense that the morbidity structure of a fund's member population cannot be extrapolated to the national population. This implies a selection bias that marks a major obstacle for statistical inference. We provide a methodology to adjust fund-specific selectivity and perform regional prevalence estimation from health insurance records. The methodology is applied to estimate regional cohort-referenced diabetes mellitus type 2 prevalence in Germany. METHODS:Records of the German Public Health Insurance Company from 2014 and Diagnosis-Related Group Statistics data are combined within a benchmarked multi-level model. The fund-specific selectivity is adjusted in a two-step procedure. Firstly, the conditional expectation of the insurance company's regional prevalence given related inpatient diagnosis frequencies of its members is quantified. Secondly, the regional prevalence is estimated by extrapolating the conditional expectation using corresponding inpatient diagnosis frequencies of the Diagnosis-Related Group Statistics as benchmarks. Model assumptions are validated via Monte Carlo simulation. Variable selection is performed via multivariate methods. The optimal model fit is determined by analysis of variance. 95% confidence intervals for the estimates are constructed via semiparametric bootstrapping. RESULTS:The national diabetes mellitus type 2 prevalence is estimated at 8.70% with a 95% confidence interval of [8.48%, 9.35%]. This indicates an adjustment of the original fund-specific prevalence from -?32.79 to -?25.93%. The estimated disease distribution shows significant morbidity differences between regions, especially between eastern and western Germany. However, the cohort-referenced estimates suggest that these differences can be partially explained by regional demography. CONCLUSIONS:The proposed methodology allows regional prevalence estimation in remarkable detail despite fund-specific selectivity. This enhances and encourages the use of health insurance records for future epidemiologic studies.

SUBMITTER: Munnich RT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6712777 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Adjusting selection bias in German health insurance records for regional prevalence estimation.

Münnich Ralf Thomas RT Burgard Jan Pablo JP Krause Joscha J

Population health metrics 20190827 1

<h4>Background</h4>Regional prevalence estimation requires epidemiologic data with substantial local detail. National health surveys may lack in sufficient local observations due to limited resources. Therefore, corresponding prevalence estimates may not capture regional morbidity patterns with the necessary accuracy. Health insurance records represent alternative data sources for this purpose. Fund-specific member populations have more local observations than surveys, which benefits regional pr ...[more]

PMID: 31455350

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the prevalence and treatment patterns of speech and language disorders in Germany.MethodsA retrospective analysis of data collected from 32% of the German population, insured by the statutory German health insurance (AOK, Local Health Care Funds). We used The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision, German Modification (ICD-10 GM) codes for stuttering (F98.5), cluttering (F98.6), and developmental disorders of speech and language (F80) to identify prevalent and newly diagnosed cases each year. Prescription and speech therapy reimbursement data were used to evaluate treatment patterns.ResultsIn 2017, 27,977 patients of all ages were diagnosed with stuttering (21,045 males, 75% and 6,932 females, 25%). Stuttering prevalence peaks at age 5 years (boys, 0.89% and girls, 0.40%). Cluttering was diagnosed in 1,800 patients of all ages (1,287 males, 71.5% and 513 females, 28.5%). Developmental disorders of speech and language were identified in 555,774 AOK-insurants (61.2% males and 38.8% females). Treatment data indicate a substantial proportion newly diagnosed stuttering individuals receive treatment (up to 45% of 6-year-old patients), with slightly fewer than 20 sessions per year, on average. We confirmed a previous study showing increased rates of atopic disorders and neurological and psychiatric comorbidities in individuals with stuttering, cluttering, and developmental disorders of speech and language.ConclusionThis is the first nationwide study using health insurance data to analyze the prevalence and newly diagnosed cases of a speech and language disorder. Prevalence and gender ratio data were consistent with the international literature. The crude prevalence of developmental disorders of speech and language increased from 2015 to 2018, whereas the crude prevalence for stuttering remained stable. For cluttering, the numbers were too low to draw reliable conclusions. Proportional treatment allocation for stuttering peaked at 6 years of age, which is the school entrance year, and is later than the prevalence peak of stuttering.

Project description:BackgroundThe Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) quantifies disability and measures disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), however is not available in administrative claims databases.ObjectivesTo develop a claims-based algorithm for deriving EDSS and validate it against a clinical dataset capturing true EDSS values from medical records.MethodsWe built a unique linked dataset combining claims data from the German AOK PLUS sickness fund and medical records from the Multiple Sclerosis Management System 3D (MSDS3D). Data were deterministically linked based on insurance numbers. We used 69 MS-related diagnostic indicators recorded with ICD-10-GM codes within 3 months before and after recorded true EDSS measures to estimate a claims-based EDSS proxy (pEDSS). Predictive performance of the pEDSS was assessed as an eight-fold (EDSS 1.0-7.0, ≥8.0), three-fold (EDSS 1.0-3.0, 4.0-5.0, ≥6.0), and binary classifier (EDSS <6.0, ≥6.0). For each classifier, predictive performance measures were determined, and overall performance was summarized using a macro F1-score. Finally, we implemented the algorithm to determine pEDSS among an overall cohort of patients with MS in AOK PLUS, who were alive and insured 12 months prior to and after index diagnosis.ResultsWe recruited 100 people with MS insured by AOK PLUS who had ≥1 EDSS measure in MSDS3D between 01/10/2015 and 30/06/2019 (620 measurements overall). Patients had a mean rescaled EDSS of 3.2 and pEDSS of 3.0. The pEDSS deviated from the true EDSS by 1.2 points, resulting in a mean squared error of prediction of 2.6. For the eight-fold classifier, the macro F1-score of 0.25 indicated low overall predictive performance. Broader severity groupings were better performing, with the three-fold and binary classifiers for severe disability achieving a F1-score of 0.68 and 0.84, respectively. In the overall AOK PLUS cohort (3,756 patients, 71.9% female, mean 51.9 years), older patients, patients with progressive forms of MS and those with higher comorbidity burden showed higher pEDSS.ConclusionGenerally, EDSS was underestimated by the algorithm as mild-to-moderate symptoms were poorly captured in claims across all functional systems. While the proxy-based approach using claims data may not allow for granular description of MS disability, broader severity groupings show good predictive performance.

Dataset Information

Adjusting selection bias in German health insurance records for regional prevalence estimation.

Publications

Adjusting selection bias in German health insurance records for regional prevalence estimation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets