Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Application of Vendor-Neutral Iterative Reconstruction Technique to Pediatric Abdominal Computed Tomography.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

To compare image qualities between vendor-neutral and vendor-specific hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques for abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) in young patients.

Materials and methods

In phantom study, we used an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom, age-equivalent to 5-year-old, and reconstructed CT data using traditional filtered back projection (FBP), vendor-specific and vendor-neutral IR techniques (ClariCT; ClariPI) in various radiation doses. Noise, low-contrast detectability and subjective spatial resolution were compared between FBP, vendor-specific (i.e., iDose1 to 5; Philips Healthcare), and vendor-neutral (i.e., ClariCT1 to 5) IR techniques in phantom. In 43 patients (median, 14 years; age range 1-19 years), noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and qualitative image quality scores of abdominopelvic CT were compared between FBP, iDose level 4 (iDose4), and ClariCT level 2 (ClariCT2), which showed most similar image quality to clinically used vendor-specific IR images (i.e., iDose4) in phantom study. Noise, CNR, and qualitative imaging scores were compared using one-way repeated measure analysis of variance.

Results

In phantom study, ClariCT2 showed noise level similar to iDose4 (14.68-7.66 Hounsfield unit [HU] vs. 14.78-6.99 HU at CT dose index volume range of 0.8-3.8 mGy). Subjective low-contrast detectability and spatial resolution were similar between ClariCT2 and iDose4. In clinical study, ClariCT2 was equivalent to iDose4 for noise (14.26-17.33 vs. 16.01-18.90) and CNR (3.55-5.24 vs. 3.20-4.60) (p > 0.05). For qualitative imaging scores, the overall image quality ([reader 1, reader 2]; 2.74 vs. 2.07, 3.02 vs. 2.28) and noise (2.88 vs. 2.23, 2.93 vs. 2.33) of ClariCT2 were superior to those of FBP (p < 0.05), and not different from those of iDose4 (2.74 vs. 2.72, 3.02 vs. 2.98; 2.88 vs. 2.77, 2.93 vs. 2.86) (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Vendor-neutral IR technique shows image quality similar to that of clinically used vendor-specific hybrid IR technique for abdominopelvic CT in young patients.

SUBMITTER: Lim WH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6715563 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Application of Vendor-Neutral Iterative Reconstruction Technique to Pediatric Abdominal Computed Tomography.

Lim Woo Hyeon WH   Choi Young Hun YH   Park Ji Eun JE   Cho Yeon Jin YJ   Lee Seunghyun S   Cheon Jung Eun JE   Kim Woo Sun WS   Kim In One IO   Kim Jong Hyo JH  

Korean journal of radiology 20190901 9


<h4>Objective</h4>To compare image qualities between vendor-neutral and vendor-specific hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques for abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) in young patients.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>In phantom study, we used an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom, age-equivalent to 5-year-old, and reconstructed CT data using traditional filtered back projection (FBP), vendor-specific and vendor-neutral IR techniques (ClariCT; ClariPI) in various radiation doses. Noise,  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5484979 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5391930 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3725149 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11007512 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6283982 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6461679 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6292212 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5384491 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4868985 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5728109 | biostudies-literature