Dataset Information

Effects of Captivity and Season on the Gut Microbiota of the Brown Frog (Rana dybowskii).

ABSTRACT: The gut microbiota of amphibians is affected by exogenous and endogenous factors. We performed a comprehensive analysis using high-throughput sequencing technology and functional predictions and observed general changes in the gut microbiota of frogs in different growth stages, seasons, and growth environments. There were no significant differences in microbial richness and diversity between juvenile and adult wild frogs, between the summer and autumn groups of captive frogs, or between wild and captive frogs. There were significant differences in the gut microbiota community structure of Rana dybowskii between the summer and autumn groups of captive frogs and between wild and captive R. dybowskii, whereas the differences between juvenile and adult wild frogs were not significant. The dominant gut bacterial phyla in frogs from both captive and wild environments included Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. Linear discriminant effect size (LEfSe) analysis showed that Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were significantly enriched in captive and wild R. dybowskii, respectively linear discriminant analysis (LDA > 4). The core operational taxonomical units (OTUs) that were found in >90% of all frogs tested encompassed 15 core OTUs. The captive frogs exhibited 15 core OTUs in addition to the above overall core microbiota, whereas the wild frogs exhibited 19 core OTUs in addition to the above overall core microbiota. Predictions made using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) suggested that eleven KEGG pathways, such as infectious diseases, immune system diseases, metabolism, metabolism of other amino acids, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides, neurodegenerative diseases, and transport and catabolism, were enriched in captive frogs. The relative abundance of several red-leg-syndrome-related pathogens increased significantly in captive frogs compared with that in wild frogs. To our knowledge, this is the first study on the effects of individual seasons and captivity on the gut microbiota of frogs.

SUBMITTER: Tong Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6716059 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effects of Captivity and Season on the Gut Microbiota of the Brown Frog (<i>Rana dybowskii</i>).

Tong Qing Q Liu Xiao-Ning XN Hu Zong-Fu ZF Ding Jia-Feng JF Bie Jia J Wang Hong-Bin HB Zhang Jian-Tao JT

Frontiers in microbiology 20190823

The gut microbiota of amphibians is affected by exogenous and endogenous factors. We performed a comprehensive analysis using high-throughput sequencing technology and functional predictions and observed general changes in the gut microbiota of frogs in different growth stages, seasons, and growth environments. There were no significant differences in microbial richness and diversity between juvenile and adult wild frogs, between the summer and autumn groups of captive frogs, or between wild and ...[more]

PMID: 31507549

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCaptive amphibians frequently receive antibiotic baths to control bacterial diseases. The potential collateral effect of these antibiotics on the microbiota of frogs is largely unknown. To date, studies have mainly relied on oral administration to examine the effects of antibiotics on the gut microbiota; in contrast, little is known regarding the effects of bath-applied antibiotics on the gut microbiota. The gut microbiota compositions of the gentamicin, recovery, and control groups were compared by Illumina high-throughput sequencing, and the functional profiles were analysed using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt). Furthermore, the relationship between the structure and predicted functional composition of the gut microbiota was determined.ResultsThe alpha diversity indices were significantly reduced by the gentamicin bath, illustrating that this treatment significantly changed the composition of the gut microbiota. After 7 days, the gut microbiota of the recovery group was not significantly different from that of the gentamicin group. Forty-four indicator taxa were selected at the genus level, comprising 42 indicators representing the control group and 2 indicators representing the gentamicin and recovery groups. Potential pathogenic bacteria of the genera Aeromonas, Citrobacter, and Chryseobacterium were significantly depleted after the gentamicin bath. There was no significant positive association between the community composition and functional composition of the gut microbiota in the gentamicin or control frogs, indicating that the functional redundancy of the gut bacterial community was high.ConclusionsGentamicin significantly changed the structure of the gut microbiota of R. dybowskii, and the gut microbiota exhibited weak resilience. However, the gentamicin bath did not change the functional composition of the gut microbiota of R. dybowskii, and there was no significant correlation between the structural composition and the functional composition of the gut microbiota.

Project description:The gut microbiota plays a key role in host health, and disruptions to gut bacterial homeostasis can cause disease. However, the effect of disease on gut microbiota assembly remains unclear and gut microbiota-based predictions of health status is a promising yet poorly established field. Using Illumina high-throughput sequencing technology, we compared the gut microbiota between healthy (HA and HB) and diarrhoeic (DS) Rana dybowskii groups and analyzed the functional profiles through a phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt) analysis. In addition, we estimated the correlation between gut microbiota structures and predicted the functional compositions. The results showed significant differences in the phylogenetic diversity (Pd), Shannon, and observed richness (Sobs) indices between the DS and HB groups, with significant differences observed in the gut microbiota composition between the DS group and the HA and HB groups. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) results revealed that Proteobacteria were significantly enriched in the DS group; Bacteroidetes were significantly enriched in the HA and HB groups; and Aeromonas, Citrobacter, Enterococcus, Hafnia-Obesumbacterium, Morganella, Lactococcus, Providencia, Vagococcus, and Staphylococcus were significantly enriched in the DS group. Venn diagrams revealed that there were many more unique genera in the DS group than the HA and HB groups. Among 102 sensitive species selected using the indicator method, 33 indicated a healthy status and 69 (e.g., Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Legionella, Morganella, Proteus, Providencia, Staphylococcus, and Vagococcus) indicated a diseased status. There was a significant and positive association between the composition and functional composition of the gut microbiota, thus indicating low functional redundancy of the frog gut bacterial community. Rana dybowskii disease was associated with changes in the gut microbiota, which subsequently disrupted bacterial-mediated functions. The results of this study can aid in revealing the effect of the R. dybowskii gut microbiota on host health and provide a basis for elucidating the mechanism of the occurrence of R. dybowskii disease.

Dataset Information

Effects of Captivity and Season on the Gut Microbiota of the Brown Frog (Rana dybowskii).

Publications

Effects of Captivity and Season on the Gut Microbiota of the Brown Frog (<i>Rana dybowskii</i>).

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets