Dataset Information

High-risk social drinkers and heavy drinkers display similar rates of alcohol consumption.

ABSTRACT: Alcohol consumption is often assessed over weeks to months, but few attempts have been made to characterize alcohol consumption rates at the level of an individual drinking session. Here, we aimed to compare the rate of alcohol consumption in social drinkers at high risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD) and heavy drinkers. One hundred and sixty social drinkers and 48 heavy drinkers participated in an alcohol self-administration study. Social drinkers were classified as low risk or high risk for AUD based on sex, impulsivity, and family history of alcoholism. Participants received a priming dose of intravenous alcohol to assess alcohol-induced craving and completed a 125-minute intravenous alcohol self-administration session to assess rate of achieving a binge-level exposure (blood alcohol concentration greater than or equal to 80 mg%). There were no differences between rates of binging in high-risk and heavy drinkers (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.48-1.56). Heavy drinkers reported higher levels of craving than high-risk and low-risk drinkers at baseline. However, following a priming dose of alcohol, there were no longer differences in craving between high-risk and heavy drinkers. These results indicate that high-risk social drinkers demonstrate binging behavior that is similar to heavy drinkers, which may be driven by alcohol-induced craving. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate whether these patterns of craving and consumption in high-risk social drinkers are predictive of future AUD.

SUBMITTER: Sloan ME

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6717699 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

High-risk social drinkers and heavy drinkers display similar rates of alcohol consumption.

Sloan Matthew E ME Gowin Joshua L JL Janakiraman Roshni R Ester Corbin D CD Stoddard Joel J Stangl Bethany B Ramchandani Vijay A VA

Addiction biology 20190301 2

Alcohol consumption is often assessed over weeks to months, but few attempts have been made to characterize alcohol consumption rates at the level of an individual drinking session. Here, we aimed to compare the rate of alcohol consumption in social drinkers at high risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD) and heavy drinkers. One hundred and sixty social drinkers and 48 heavy drinkers participated in an alcohol self-administration study. Social drinkers were classified as low risk or high risk for AU ...[more]

PMID: 30821409

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is the most common disorder of prolonged drinking. Mechanisms underlying cirrhosis in such patients remain unclear. MicroRNAs play regulatory role in several diseases, are affected by alcohol and may be important players in alcohol use disorders, such as cirrhosis. Methods: We investigated serum samples from heavy chronic alcohol users (80 g/day (male) and 50 g/day (female) for ≥10 years) that were available from our previously reported GenomALC study. A subset of GenomALC drinkers with liver cirrhosis (cases, n = 24) and those without significant liver disease (drinking controls, n = 23) were included. Global microRNA profiling was performed using high-throughput real-time quantitative PCR to identify the microRNA signatures associated with cirrhosis. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software was utilized to identify target mRNAs of significantly altered microRNAs, and molecular pathways were analysed. Identified microRNAs were analysed for correlation with traditional liver disease biomarkers and risk gene variants previously reported from GenomALC genome-wide association study. Results: The expression of 21 microRNAs was significantly downregulated in cases compared to drinking controls (p < 0.05, ∆∆Ct > 1.5-fold). Seven microRNAs (miR-16, miR-19a, miR-27a, miR-29b, miR-101, miR-130a, and miR-191) had a highly significant correlation (p < 0.001) with INR, bilirubin and MELD score. Three microRNAs (miR-27a, miR-130a and miR-191) significantly predicted cases with AUC-ROC 0.8, 0.78 and 0.85, respectively (p < 0.020); however, INR performed best (0.97, p < 0.001). A different set of six microRNAs (miR-19a, miR-26a, miR-101, miR-151-3p, miR-221, and miR-301) showed positive correlation (ranging from 0.32 to 0.51, p < 0.05) with rs10433937:HSD17B13 gene variant, associated with the risk of cirrhosis. IPA analysis revealed mRNA targets of the significantly altered microRNAs associated with cell death/necrosis, fibrosis and increased steatosis, particularly triglyceride metabolism. Conclusions: MicroRNA signatures in drinkers distinguished those with liver cirrhosis from drinkers without liver disease. We identified mRNA targets in liver functions that were enriched for disease pathogenesis pathways.

Project description:Background and aimsCannabis is commonly used among people who drink alcohol, but evidence suggests a nuanced relationship between alcohol consumption and cannabis use. In particular, among individuals undergoing alcohol treatment the impact of cannabis on alcohol intake may depend upon cannabis use frequency. We aimed to test the effects of within-day cannabis use on total drinks consumed and likelihood of binge drinking on a given day among all participants and compare these relationships between males and females and between individuals who reported infrequent and frequent cannabis use.DesignThis observational study is a substudy of a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT). Individuals were included from the RCT if they reported any cannabis use and were divided into groups based on cannabis use patterns. Alcohol use was compared within and between groups.SettingIndividuals were recruited from 2016 to 2020 from community and university settings in Denver and Boulder, CO, USA.ParticipantsOf the 182 individuals enrolled in the RCT, 96 cannabis-using subjects were included in these analyses.MeasurementsSubjects completed a time-line follow-back (TLFB) at baseline, 4, 8 (end of treatment) and 20 weeks. Daily data on alcohol and cannabis use from the TLFB at all time-points were analyzed.FindingsAcross the sample (n = 96), individuals drank approximately 29% fewer drinks [95% confidence interval (CI) = 18-39%, P < 0.001] and were 2.06 times (95% CI =1.37-3.08, P < 0.001) less likely to have a binge-drinking episode on days that cannabis was used compared with days that cannabis was not used. These patterns were observed in males, females and the infrequent and frequent cannabis use groups. Findings were inconclusive regarding differences in the association between cannabis use and alcohol outcomes when comparing males and females and when comparing infrequent and frequent cannabis use groups.ConclusionsHeavy drinkers engaged in treatment to reduce their alcohol consumption who also use cannabis appear to increase their cannabis use on days when they reduce their alcohol consumption.

Project description:IntroductionAlcohol is among the most commonly used psychoactive drugs, yet it can produce markedly different subjective effects in different people. Certain effects, including both heightened stimulatory effects and lesser sedative effects, are thought to predict repeated or excessive use. However, we do not fully understand the nature of these individual differences or their relationships to alcohol consumption. This controlled laboratory study examined subjective and physiologic responses to a moderate dose of alcohol in social drinkers in relation to the subjects' decision to consume alcohol.MethodsHealthy adult volunteers (N = 95) participated in a 5-session double-blind alcohol choice study. On the first 4 sessions, they received alcohol (0.8 g/kg) and placebo in alternating order, and on the fifth session, they chose and consumed whichever of the 2 they preferred. During each session, participants completed the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) questionnaires and had their vitals recorded every 30 minutes. We compared subjective and physiologic response to alcohol during the sampling sessions in participants who chose alcohol or placebo on session 5.ResultsOf the 95 participants, 55 chose alcohol (choosers) and 40 chose placebo (nonchoosers). In the full sample, alcohol produced its expected effects (e.g., increased friendliness, elation, and vigor (POMS), and stimulation and sedation (BAES)). The chooser and nonchooser groups did not differ in demographic characteristics, blood alcohol levels, or cardiovascular measures. However, the choosers experienced greater alcohol-induced increases in positive mood (POMS) and liked the drug more, whereas the nonchoosers experienced greater anger, anxiety (POMS), and sedation (BAES) after alcohol.ConclusionBoth greater positive mood effects and lesser sedative effects after alcohol predicted preference under controlled conditions, suggesting that both factors can predict future consumption of alcohol.

Dataset Information

High-risk social drinkers and heavy drinkers display similar rates of alcohol consumption.

Publications

High-risk social drinkers and heavy drinkers display similar rates of alcohol consumption.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets