[A Review on Comparison of Lobectomy and Segmentectomy in the Treatment of ?Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Chen L
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6717873 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
[A Review on Comparison of Lobectomy and Segmentectomy in the Treatment of Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].
Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer 20190801 8
Lung cancer is a worldwide malignancy with high morbidity and mortality in the world. With the application of low-dose spiral computed tomography in the screening and diagnosis of lung cancer, more lung cancers are detected at an early stage and cured by surgical treatment. Anatomical lobectomy has long been the standard procedure for the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, whether intentional segmentectomy can be more used remains controversial. And this paper focuses ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundSurgery has become an accepted method for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this Bayesian meta-analysis was to compare the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) between wedge resection and lobectomy/segmentectomy for treatment of early-stage NSCLC.MethodsEligible studies were retrieved from Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CNKI, and WanFang up to July 2021 and screened based on established selection criteria. The Bayesian meta-analysis was performed with the combination of the reported survival outcomes of the individual studies using a random-effect model. The OS, DFS, and RFS of the wedge resection group was compared with the lobectomy/segmentectomy group. The hazard ratio (HR) and standard error were extracted or calculated for each study using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsThis study was registered with PROSPERO (INPLASY202080090).The pooled OS hazard ratio between segmentectomy and lobectomy was 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.4], the pooled HR between lobectomy and wedge resection was 0.71 [95% CI 0.52-0.96], and the pooled HR between segmentectomy and wedge was 0.80 [95% CI 0.56-1.10]. The pooled HR of DFS or RFS was not statistically significant among the three surgical approaches.ConclusionsPatients with early-stage NSCLC received lobectomy had the lowest hazard ratio of OS than patients received wedge resection, indicating that the overall survival of patients received lobectomy was higher than patients received wedge resection. However, regarding DFS and RFS, the three surgical approaches showed no significant difference.
| S-EPMC8493945 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesAlthough segmentectomy is an acceptable alternative to lobectomy for peripheral small-sized non-small-cell lung cancer, the effectiveness of segmentectomy for inner lesions remains unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of segmentectomy in comparison with lobectomy for inner lesions.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed 570 patients with small (≤2 cm) cN0 non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy between January 2007 and March 2021. We focused on patients with lesions located in the inner two-thirds, which were determined using three-dimensional computed tomography (n = 227). After propensity score matching analysis based on sex, age, pulmonary function, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, radiographic tumour findings and tumour location, we compared the surgical and oncological outcomes in patients who underwent segmentectomy (n = 66) and lobectomy (n = 66).ResultsPostoperative mortality or morbidity did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates in the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups were 93.6% vs 84.1% and 95.8% vs 87.9%, respectively. The differences between 2 groups were not significant (P = 0.62 and P = 0.23, respectively). The 2 groups also showed no differences in loco-regional recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that segmentectomy had a comparable impact on recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-2.03; P = 0.43).ConclusionsSegmentectomy for inner-located small-sized non-small-cell lung tumours could be an acceptable treatment in comparison with lobectomy.
| S-EPMC9468593 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThoracoscopic segmentectomy is increasingly used in the surgical treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, it remains unclear whether pulmonary function loss after thoracoscopic lung resection is in direct proportion to the number of resected segments, and thus intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy has the function-preserving advantage over thoracoscopic lobectomy.MethodsIn this prospective observational study, spirometry tests were performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The observed functional loss was compared with the expected loss estimated by the segment counting method. Resection extent index was introduced as the number of resected segments to total number of segments in the corresponding lobe. Spirometry changes after thoracoscopic lobectomy and intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy were compared using propensity score matching.ResultsThere were 338 thoracoscopic lobectomies and 321 thoracoscopic segmentectomies. Overall, the observed pulmonary function loss after segmentectomy was significantly less than after lobectomy. But the observed functional loss was significantly greater than the expected loss after segmentectomy. And pulmonary function loss per segment resected was almost doubled after segmentectomy comparing to lobectomy. For segmentectomies with a resection extent index less than 0.5, especially single segmentectomies, pulmonary function loss was significantly less than after corresponding lobectomies. Otherwise, no significant differences in spirometry changes between lobectomies and segmentectomies were detected.ConclusionsPulmonary function loss after thoracoscopic lung resection cannot be accurately evaluated by the number of resected segments. According to the resection extent index, intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy may help preserve more pulmonary function than thoracoscopic lobectomy only when less than half of the corresponding lobe are resected.
| S-EPMC8674599 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSegmentectomy has been proven to have better survival and perioperative efficacy than lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) up to 2 cm. Whether this result is applicable to stage T1cN0M0 NSCLC (2.1 to 3 cm) remains controversial.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search across seven databases to identify relevant studies comparing lobectomy and segmentectomy procedures. Our primary focus was on survival indicators (overall survival [OS] and disease-free survival [DFS]), while for secondary outcomes, operative outcomes, hospitalization outcomes, recurrences, and complications were considered.ResultsAfter screening, the final analysis included 10 studies (involving 22113 patients in the lobectomy group and 1627 patients in the segmentectomy group). The lobectomy procedure achieved better OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.19 [1.07~1.33]) and DFS (HR: 1.37 [1.10~1.71]), which were proven in all subgroups. The OS rate at 2-5 years and DFS rate at 4-5 years were higher in the lobectomy group. The advantages of OS and DFS in the lobectomy group increased over the survival time. More lymph node dissections, intraoperative blood loss and total complications were found in the lobectomy group. Similar hospital stays, 90-day mortality and conversion thoracotomy were found between the two groups.ConclusionLobectomy appeared to be the better choice for patients with stage T1cN0M0 NSCLC with better survival (OS and DFS). However, the complications needed to be taken seriously.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identification CRD42023445013.
| S-EPMC10578965 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWhether segmentectomy is appropriate for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially for stage IA NSCLC with a tumor size of 2-3 cm, remains controversial. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare segmentectomy and lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC with a tumor size of 2-3 cm and IA ≤2 cm NSCLC.MethodsA systematic screening of online databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was conducted regarding the terms of perioperative outcomes, overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). The inverse-variance and Mantel-Haenszel approaches were used to pool effect sizes for survival outcomes and perioperative outcomes.ResultsA total of 10 articles were included in the analysis. The perioperative morbidity [risk ratio (RR): 0.90, P=0.10], mortality (RR: 0.94, P=0.84), intraoperative blood loss [mean difference (MD): 3.07, P=0.86] and operative time (MD: 18.99, P=0.13) were comparable between the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups. The number of lymph nodes harvested was statistically less in segmentectomy than in lobectomy (MD: -5.71, P=0.02). In stage IA patients with a tumor size of 2-3 cm, lobectomy showed superior survival outcomes compared to segmentectomy, with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 1.39 (P=0.01) for OS and 1.38 (P=0.06) for RFS or DFS. In stage IA ≤2 cm, lobectomy and segmentectomy had comparable survival outcomes with pooled HRs of 1.18 (P=0.29) for OS and 1.18 (P=0.12) for RFS or DFS.ConclusionsWhen a patient is in stage IA and the tumor size is less than 2 cm, segmentectomy should be performed. If the tumor size is between 2 and 3 cm, lobectomy is recommended.
| S-EPMC10482631 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess potential differences in perioperative outcomes and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with pathological stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent minimally invasive anatomical segmentectomy or lobectomy.MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search of EMBASE (through Ovid), MEDLINE (via PubMed), and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted. Two researchers independently reviewed each eligible study that included patients with stage IA NSCLC who underwent minimally invasive anatomical segmentectomy and lobectomy and compared perioperative and/or survival outcomes of patients.ResultsA total of 887 publications were identified. Of these, 10 articles met our eligibility criteria. A significantly higher number of lymph nodes were harvested in lobectomies. The two groups did not significantly differ in postoperative complication rates, DFS, and OS. Patients who underwent segmentectomy had shorter postoperative hospital stays.ConclusionsMinimally invasive lobectomy and segmentectomy showed comparable short-term and long-term outcomes in stage IA NSCLC patients. Postoperative complication rates were similar. Minimally invasive lobectomies are associated with a higher number of harvested lymph nodes, although this did not affect the final staging or the survival outcomes.
| S-EPMC9777177 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSegmentectomy has been recommended for ground glass opacity (GGO)-dominant small-sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or those with GGO component. Pure solid NSCLC is a special sub-type and has an inferior prognosis. Whether segmentectomy could achieve comparable long-term outcomes with lobectomy for pure solid small-sized NSCLC remained controversial. This study aimed to compare the prognosis of segmentectomy and lobectomy for pure solid NSCLC.MethodsNSCLC patients with a pure solid nodule (≤2 cm) who received segmentectomy or lobectomy between January 2010 and June 2019 were retrospectively screened. Log-rank test, univariable, and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used for prognostic comparison. Further, the propensity score matching analysis was adopted to yield a matched cohort.ResultsAfter screening, 344 pure solid NSCLC patients with a median follow-up time of 56 months were reserved. Among them, 98 patients underwent segmentectomy and the other 246 subjects received lobectomy. The lobectomy group had a larger tumor size, a higher rate of lymph node metastasis than the segmentectomy arm. Generally, patients with segmentectomy had a better disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.011) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.028) than those with lobectomy. However, the multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that no significant survival difference existed between segmentectomy and lobectomy after adjusting the potential confounding factors (DFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-1.77, p = 0.476; OS: HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.08-1.59, p = 0.178). Consistently, in the propensity score matched cohort, segmentectomy (n = 74) yielded similar DFS (p = 0.960) and OS (p = 0.320) with lobectomy (n = 74).ConclusionsSegmentectomy could achieve comparable oncological outcomes with lobectomy for pure solid small-sized NSCLC.
| S-EPMC10101834 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Whether video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy and VATS lobectomy provide similar perioperative and oncological outcomes in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial. METHODS:Meta-analysis of 12 studies comparing outcomes after VATS lobectomy and VATS segmentectomy for stage I NSCLC. Data were analyzed by the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS:Disease-free survival (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.33, P = 0.39), overall survival (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.38, P = 0.36), postoperative complications (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.75, P = 0.7), intraoperative blood loss (MD = 3.87, 95% CI - 10.21 to 17.94, P = 0.59), operative time (MD = 10.89, 95% CI - 13.04 to 34.82, P = 0.37), air leak > 5 days (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.17, P = 0.55), and in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 0.39 to 7.16, P = 0.49) were comparable between the groups. Postoperative hospital stay (MD = - 0.69, 95% CI - 1.19 to - 0.19, P = 0.007) and number of dissected lymph nodes (MD = - 6.44, 95%CI - 9.49 to - 3.40, P < 0.0001) were significantly lower in VATS segmentectomy patients. CONCLUSIONS:VATS segmentectomy and VATS lobectomy provide similar oncological and perioperative outcomes for stage I NSCLC patients. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO and can be accessed at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID = CRD42019133398.
| S-EPMC7047378 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLobectomy has long been regarded as the standard treatment for operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent studies suggested that segmentectomy could achieve a good prognosis for early-stage NSCLC and might be an alternative to lobectomy in this cohort. Until now, on the issue of comparison between lobectomy and segmentectomy, there remains no published randomized controlled trial (RCT), and all existing evidence is low. Recently, a categorization of lower-level evidence has been proposed, namely, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the oncologic outcome between lobectomy and segmentectomy in NSCLC with the clinical T1N0M0 stage according to the GRADE system.MethodsPubMed, the PMC database, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library were searched prior to May 2019 to identify studies that compared the prognosis between lobectomy and segmentectomy for clinical T1N0M0 NSCLC. The evidence level of the included studies was assessed according to the GRADE system, including level IIA, probably not confounded nonrandomized comparison; level IIB, possibly confounded nonrandomized comparison; and level IIC, probably confounded nonrandomized comparison. The predefined outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were pooled using a random-effects model.ResultsTwelve nonrandomized studies involving 8,072 participants were included. Of these studies, two were classified as IIA level (16.7%), six as IIB level (50.0%), and four as IIC level (33.3%). When crude HRs were included, compared with lobectomy, segmentectomy was associated with shorter OS but comparable DFS in the entire cohort (OS, pooled HR =1.45, 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.67; DFS, pooled HR =1.03, 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.82) and in patients with nodules ?2 cm (OS, pooled HR =1.55, 95% CI, 1.33 to 1.80; DFS, pooled HR =0.98, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.77). When adjusted HRs were included, the impact of segmentectomy on OS and DFS was comparable to that of lobectomy in the entire cohort (OS, pooled HR =1.39, 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.10; DFS, pooled HR =0.83, 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.03) and in patients with nodules ?2 cm (OS, pooled HR =1.61, 95% CI, 0.87 to 3.00; DFS, pooled HR =0.90, 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.27).ConclusionsBased on our results, although shorter OS is observed in patients received segmentectomy, it is necessary to wait for more results from RCT to draw a valid conclusion.
| S-EPMC7330803 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This report describes the surgical management of a male patient with early-stage lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic completion right lower lobectomy after previously undergoing sublobar resection for multifocal ground glass nodules of the lung. Perioperative considerations associated with the management of dense pulmonary hilar adhesions and the techniques used are discussed.
| S-EPMC6501029 | biostudies-literature