Dataset Information

Access delays to essential surgical care using the Three Delays Framework and Bellwether procedures at Timor Leste's national referral hospital.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:Our objectives were to characterise the nature and extent of delay times to essential surgical care in a developing nation by measuring the actual stages of delay for patients receiving Bellwether procedures. SETTING:The study was conducted at Timor Leste's national referral hospital in Dili, the country's capital. PARTICIPANTS:All patients requiring a Bellwether procedure over a 2-month period were included in the study. Participants whose procedure was undertaken more than 24?hours from initial hospital presentation were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES:Data pertaining to the patient journey from onset of symptoms to emergency procedure was collected by interview of patients, their treating surgeons or anaesthetists and the medical records. Timelines were then calculated against the Three Delays Framework. RESULTS:Fifty-six patients were entered into the study. Their mean delay from symptom onset to entering the anaesthesia bay for a procedure was 32.3?hours (+/-11.6). The second delay (4.1+/-2.5?hours) was significantly less than the first (20.9+/-11.5?hours; p<0.005) and third delays (7.2+/-1.2?hours; p<0.05). Additionally, patients with acute abdominal pain (of which 18/20 ultimately had open appendicectomy and two emergency laparotomies) had a delay time of 53.3?hours (+/-21.3), significantly more than that for emergency caesarean (22.9+/-18.6?hours; p<0.05) or management of an open long-bone fracture (15.5+/-5.56?hours; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Substantial delays were observed for all three stages and each Bellwether procedure. This study methodology could be used to measure access and the three delays to emergency surgical care in low/middle-income countries, although the actual reasons for delay may vary between regions and countries and would require a qualitative study.

SUBMITTER: Bagguley D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6720142 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Access delays to essential surgical care using the Three Delays Framework and Bellwether procedures at Timor Leste's national referral hospital.

Bagguley Dominic D Fordyce Andrew A Guterres Jose J Soares Alito A Valadares Edgar E Guest Glenn Douglas GD Watters David D

BMJ open 20190824 8

<h4>Objectives</h4>Our objectives were to characterise the nature and extent of delay times to essential surgical care in a developing nation by measuring the actual stages of delay for patients receiving Bellwether procedures.<h4>Setting</h4>The study was conducted at Timor Leste's national referral hospital in Dili, the country's capital.<h4>Participants</h4>All patients requiring a Bellwether procedure over a 2-month period were included in the study. Participants whose procedure was undertak ...[more]

PMID: 31446414

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceConditions that can be treated by surgery comprise more than 16% of the global disease burden. However, 5 billion people do not have access to essential surgical care. An estimated 90% of the 87 million disability-adjusted life-years incurred by surgical conditions could be averted by providing access to timely and safe surgery in low-income and middle-income countries. Population-level spatial access to essential surgery in Ghana is not known.ObjectivesTo assess the performance of bellwether procedures (ie, open fracture repair, emergency laparotomy, and cesarean section) as a proxy for performing essential surgery more broadly, to map population-level spatial access to essential surgery, and to identify first-level referral hospitals that would most improve access to essential surgery if strengthened in Ghana.Design, setting, and participantsPopulation-based study among all households and public and private not-for-profit hospitals in Ghana. Households were represented by georeferenced census data. First-level and second-level referral hospitals managed by the Ministry of Health and all tertiary hospitals were included. Surgical data were collected from January 1 to December 31, 2014.Main outcomes and measuresAll procedures performed at first-level referral hospitals in Ghana in 2014 were used to sort each facility into 1 of the following 3 hospital groups: those without capability to perform all 3 bellwether procedures, those that performed 1 to 11 of each procedure, and those that performed at least 12 of each procedure. Candidates for targeted capability improvement were identified by cost-distance and network analysis.ResultsOf 155 first-level referral hospitals managed by the Ghana Health Service and the Christian Health Association of Ghana, 123 (79.4%) reported surgical data. Ninety-five (77.2%) did not have the capability in 2014 to perform all 3 bellwether procedures, 24 (19.5%) performed 1 to 11 of each bellwether procedure, and 4 (3.3%) performed at least 12. The essential surgical procedure rate was greater in bellwether procedure-capable first-level referral hospitals than in noncapable hospitals (median, 638; interquartile range, 440-1418 vs 360; interquartile range, 0-896 procedures per 100 000 population; P = .03). Population-level spatial access within 2 hours to a hospital that performed 1 to 11 and at least 12 of each bellwether procedure was 83.2% (uncertainty interval [UI], 82.2%-83.4%) and 71.4% (UI, 64.4%-75.0%), respectively. Five hospitals were identified for targeted capability improvement.Conclusions and relevanceAlmost 30% of Ghanaians cannot access essential surgery within 2 hours. Bellwether capability is a useful metric for essential surgery more broadly. Similar strategic planning exercises might be useful for other low-income and middle-income countries aiming to improve access to essential surgery.

Project description:BackgroundHepatitis B virus(HBV) and hepatitis C virus(HCV) are the main causes of cirrhosis, liver cancer, and death. This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence and associated factors of HBV surface antigen(HBsAg) and anti-HCV among patients screened for surgery at Felegehiwot referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.MethodsA hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 433 patients in 2018. Data on socio-demographic and risk factors were collected by an exit interview using a pretested structured questionnaire. A venous blood sample of 5ml was collected from each participant, and serum was tested for HBsAg and anti-HCV using one-step rapid test kits and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was computed to identify factors associated with HBV and HCV infections. The odds ratio with 95%CI was used to describe the strength of association and statistical significance.ResultsA total of 422 patients gave data and included in the analysis. The mean age of patients was 36±5 years. About two-thirds, 269(64%) and 274(65%) patients were males, and from rural areas, respectively. The seroprevalence of HBsAg was 34(8%) followed by 18(4.3%) anti-HCV and 4(0.9%) co-infections. Being single(AOR = 1.96, 95%CI = 1.12-3.10), rural residence (AOR = 2.68, 95%CI = 1.28-5.61), ever heard about HBV (AOR = 2.41, 95%CI = 1.18-5.20), having multiple sexual partners(AOR = 2.85, 95%CI = 1.30-5.58), HIV positive(AOR = 3.14, 95%CI = 1.31-7.61), history of tooth extraction(AOR = 3.0, 95%CI = 1.40-6.56), hospitalization history(AOR = 2.95, 95%CI = 1.26-5.81), sharing of sharp instruments (AOR = 3.86, 95%CI = 1.82-8.79), and had blood contact(AOR = 2.64, 95%CI = 1.14-5.42) were statistically significant factors to HBV infection. Similarly, sharing of sharp instruments(AOR = 4.65, 95%CI = 1.32-15.1), tooth extraction practice(AOR = 2.81, 95%CI = 1.12-6.56), surgical history (AOR = 3.68, 95%CI = 1.64-9.82), hospitalization history(AOR = 4.51, 95%CI = 1.62-8.35) and had blood contact(AOR = 3.2, 95%CI = 1.56-8.51) were significant factors to HCV infection.ConclusionThe seroprevalence of HBsAg and ant-HCV was high compared to WHO and previous study findings. Giving special attention to awareness creation, rural settings, improving personal behaviors, infection prevention activities of health facilities, quality of healthcare procedures is crucial to prevent viral hepatitis infection.

Project description:BackgroundThe WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has a growing evidence base to support its role in improving perioperative safety, although its impact is likely to be directly related to the effectiveness of its implementation. There remains a paucity of documented experience from low-resource settings on Checklist implementation approaches. We report an implementation strategy in a public referral hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, based on consultation, local leadership, formal introduction, and supported supervision with subsequent audit and feedback.MethodsPlanning, implementation and assessment took place from December 2011 to December 2012. The planning phase, from December 2011 until April 2012, involved a multidisciplinary consultative approach using local leaders, volunteer clinicians, and staff from non-governmental organisations, to draw up a locally agreed and appropriate Checklist. Implementation in April 2012 involved formal teaching and discussion, simulation sessions and role play, with supportive supervision following implementation. Assessment was performed using completed Checklist analysis and staff satisfaction questionnaires at one month and further Checklist analysis combined with semi-structured interviews in December 2012.Results and discussionChecklist compliance rates were 83% for general anaesthetics at one month after implementation, with an overall compliance rate of 65% at eight months. There was a decrease in Checklist compliance over the period of the study to less than 20% by the end of the study period. The 'Sign out' section was reported as being the most difficult section of the Checklist to complete, and was missed completely in 21% of cases. The most commonly missed single item was the team introduction at the start of each case. However, we report high staff satisfaction with the Checklist and enthusiasm for its continued use.ConclusionWe report a detailed implementation strategy for introducing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist to a low-resource setting. We show that this approach can lead to high completion rates and high staff satisfaction, albeit with a drop in completion rates over time. We argue that maximal benefit of the Surgical Safety Checklist is likely to be when it engenders a conversation around patient safety within a department, and when there is local ownership of this process.

Project description:BackgroundSurgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines are considered as important interventional tools for antimicrobial resistance. Guideline compliance was poor across different countries and thus results in an inappropriate and overuse of antibiotics.ObjectiveTo evaluate the selection, timing and duration of prophylactic antibiotic administration among surgical patients in Nekmte referral hospital.MethodProspective, facility based cross-sectional study was conducted from 1st April to 30th June 2017. Data were collected using data abstraction format among surgical inpatients prescribed with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines were used as data assessment protocols. SPSS version 21.0 was used for data entry and analysis. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used for analysis.ResultsThe median age of the study participants was 35.0 (IQR: 25-50) years with the preponderance (58.8%) of male patients. The median hospitalization period was 8.0 (IQR: 5-11) days. Majority of the participants were from the general surgical ward (60.1%). About 43% of the procedures were clean. Most of the surgical cases were gastrointestinal (39.2%). Only 10.6% of the drug selections comply with American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guideline. Surprisingly, none of the selections were compliant to the national Standard Treatment Guideline of the country. About 84% of the study participants received ceftriaxone. Majority of the prophylactic antibiotics (75.8%) were administered for greater than 24 hours and above half (52.3%) of the antibiotics were administered preoperatively. Emergent surgery procedures (AOR = 2.89, 95% CI: (1.09-9.10) and being a male patient (AOR = 3.10, 95% CI: 1.07-8.98) were associated with inappropriate preoperative antibiotic administration. Patients admitted to the gynecology and obstetrics ward was less likely to receive surgical prophylaxis for greater than 24 hours (AOR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.81).ConclusionSurgical antibiotic compliance was far below the guideline recommendation. Patients admitted in the gynecology and obstetrics ward were more likely to comply with the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis duration recommendation. The timing was most likely to be inappropriate among male patients and patients on emergent surgery. Availability and awareness creation on the antibiotic drugs and the guidelines were important interventions recommended for appropriate surgical antimicrobial use.

Dataset Information

Access delays to essential surgical care using the Three Delays Framework and Bellwether procedures at Timor Leste's national referral hospital.

Publications

Access delays to essential surgical care using the Three Delays Framework and Bellwether procedures at Timor Leste's national referral hospital.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets