Dataset Information

Localized Trajectories for 2D and 3D Action Recognition.

ABSTRACT: The Dense Trajectories concept is one of the most successful approaches in action recognition, suitable for scenarios involving a significant amount of motion. However, due to noise and background motion, many generated trajectories are irrelevant to the actual human activity and can potentially lead to performance degradation. In this paper, we propose Localized Trajectories as an improved version of Dense Trajectories where motion trajectories are clustered around human body joints provided by RGB-D cameras and then encoded by local Bag-of-Words. As a result, the Localized Trajectories concept provides an advanced discriminative representation of actions. Moreover, we generalize Localized Trajectories to 3D by using the depth modality. One of the main advantages of 3D Localized Trajectories is that they describe radial displacements that are perpendicular to the image plane. Extensive experiments and analysis were carried out on five different datasets.

SUBMITTER: Papadopoulos K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6720755 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Localized Trajectories for 2D and 3D Action Recognition.

Papadopoulos Konstantinos K Demisse Girum G Ghorbel Enjie E Antunes Michel M Aouada Djamila D Ottersten Björn B

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 20190810 16

The Dense Trajectories concept is one of the most successful approaches in action recognition, suitable for scenarios involving a significant amount of motion. However, due to noise and background motion, many generated trajectories are irrelevant to the actual human activity and can potentially lead to performance degradation. In this paper, we propose Localized Trajectories as an improved version of Dense Trajectories where motion trajectories are clustered around human body joints provided by ...[more]

PMID: 31405153

Similar Datasets

Project description:The proportion of individuals with depression has rapidly increased along with the growth of the global population. Depression has been the currently most prevalent mental health disorder. An effective depression recognition system is especially crucial for the early detection of potential depression risk. A depression-related dataset is also critical while evaluating the system for depression or potential depression risk detection. Due to the sensitive nature of clinical data, availability and scale of such datasets are scarce. To our knowledge, there are few extensively practical depression datasets for the Chinese population. In this study, we first create a large-scale dataset by asking subjects to perform five mood-elicitation tasks. After each task, subjects' audio and video are collected, including 3D information (depth information) of facial expressions via a Kinect. The constructed dataset is from a real environment, i.e., several psychiatric hospitals, and has a specific scale. Then we propose a novel approach for potential depression risk recognition based on two kinds of different deep belief network (DBN) models. One model extracts 2D appearance features from facial images collected by an optical camera, while the other model extracts 3D dynamic features from 3D facial points collected by a Kinect. The final decision result comes from the combination of the two models. Finally, we evaluate all proposed deep models on our built dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that (1) our proposed method is able to identify patients with potential depression risk; (2) the recognition performance of combined 2D and 3D features model outperforms using either 2D or 3D features model only; (3) the performance of depression recognition is higher in the positive and negative emotional stimulus, and females' recognition rate is generally higher than that for males. Meanwhile, we compare the performance with other methods on the same dataset. The experimental results show that our integrated 2D and 3D features DBN is more reasonable and universal than other methods, and the experimental paradigm designed for depression is reasonable and practical.

Project description:As clinics begin to use 3D metrics for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance, it must be noted that these metrics will often produce results different from those produced by their 2D counterparts. 3D and 2D gamma analyses would be expected to produce different values, in part because of the different search space available. In the present investigation, the authors compared the results of 2D and 3D gamma analysis (where both datasets were generated in the same manner) for clinical treatment plans.Fifty IMRT plans were selected from the authors' clinical database, and recalculated using Monte Carlo. Treatment planning system-calculated ("evaluated dose distributions") and Monte Carlo-recalculated ("reference dose distributions") dose distributions were compared using 2D and 3D gamma analysis. This analysis was performed using a variety of dose-difference (5%, 3%, 2%, and 1%) and distance-to-agreement (5, 3, 2, and 1 mm) acceptance criteria, low-dose thresholds (5%, 10%, and 15% of the prescription dose), and data grid sizes (1.0, 1.5, and 3.0 mm). Each comparison was evaluated to determine the average 2D and 3D gamma, lower 95th percentile gamma value, and percentage of pixels passing gamma.The average gamma, lower 95th percentile gamma value, and percentage of passing pixels for each acceptance criterion demonstrated better agreement for 3D than for 2D analysis for every plan comparison. The average difference in the percentage of passing pixels between the 2D and 3D analyses with no low-dose threshold ranged from 0.9% to 2.1%. Similarly, using a low-dose threshold resulted in a difference between the mean 2D and 3D results, ranging from 0.8% to 1.5%. The authors observed no appreciable differences in gamma with changes in the data density (constant difference: 0.8% for 2D vs 3D).The authors found that 3D gamma analysis resulted in up to 2.9% more pixels passing than 2D analysis. It must be noted that clinical 2D versus 3D datasets may have additional differences--for example, if 2D measurements are made with a different dosimeter than 3D measurements. Factors such as inherent dosimeter differences may be an important additional consideration to the extra dimension of available data that was evaluated in this study.

Dataset Information

Localized Trajectories for 2D and 3D Action Recognition.

Publications

Localized Trajectories for 2D and 3D Action Recognition.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets