Dataset Information

Prehospital Stroke Management Optimized by Use of Clinical Scoring vs Mobile Stroke Unit for Triage of Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Transferring patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) to hospitals not providing interventional treatment options is an unresolved medical problem.

Objective

To determine how optimized prehospital management (OPM) based on use of the Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS) compares with management in a Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) in accurately triaging patients to the appropriate hospital with (comprehensive stroke center [CSC]) or without (primary stroke center [PSC]) interventional treatment.

Design, setting, and participants

In this randomized multicenter trial with 3-month follow-up, patients were assigned week-wise to one of the pathways between June 15, 2015, and November 15, 2017, in 2 regions of Saarland, Germany; 708 of 824 suspected stroke patients did not meet inclusion criteria, resulting in a study population of 116 adult patients.

Interventions

Patients received either OPM based on a standard operating procedure that included the use of the LAMS (cut point ≥4) or management in an MSU (an ambulance with vascular imaging, point-of-care laboratory, and telecommunication capabilities).

Main outcomes and measures

The primary end point was the proportion of patients accurately triaged to either CSCs (LVO, ICH) or PSCs (others).

Results

A predefined interim analysis was performed after 116 patients of the planned 232 patients had been enrolled. Of these, 53 were included in the OPM group (67.9% women; mean [SD] age, 74 [11] years) and 63 in the MSU group (57.1% women; mean [SD] age, 75 [11] years). The primary end point, an accurate triage decision, was reached for 37 of 53 patients (69.8%) in the OPM group and for 63 of 63 patients (100%) in the MSU group (difference, 30.2%; 95% CI, 17.8%-42.5%; P < .001). Whereas 7 of 17 OPM patients (41.2%) with LVO or ICH required secondary transfers from a PSC to a CSC, none of the 11 MSU patients (0%) required such transfers (difference, 41.2%; 95% CI, 17.8%-64.6%; P = .02). The LAMS at a cut point of 4 or higher led to an accurate diagnosis of LVO or ICH for 13 of 17 patients (76.5%; 6 triaged to a CSC) and of LVO selectively for 7 of 9 patients (77.8%; 2 triaged to a CSC). Stroke management metrics were better in the MSU group, although patient outcomes were not significantly different.

Conclusions and relevance

Whereas prehospital management optimized by LAMS allows accurate triage decisions for approximately 70% of patients, MSU-based management enables accurate triage decisions for 100%. Depending on the specific health care environment considered, both approaches are potentially valuable in triaging stroke patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02465346.

SUBMITTER: Helwig SA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6724153 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prehospital Stroke Management Optimized by Use of Clinical Scoring vs Mobile Stroke Unit for Triage of Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Helwig Stefan A SA Ragoschke-Schumm Andreas A Schwindling Lenka L Kettner Michael M Roumia Safwan S Kulikovski Johann J Keller Isabel I Manitz Matthias M Martens Daniel D Grün Daniel D Walter Silke S Lesmeister Martin M Ewen Kira K Brand Jannik J Fousse Mathias M Kauffmann Jil J Zimmer Valerie C VC Mathur Shrey S Bertsch Thomas T Guldner Jürgen J Magull-Seltenreich Achim A Binder Andreas A Spüntrup Elmar E Chatzikonstantinou Anastasios A Adam Oliver O Kronfeld Kai K Liu Yang Y Ruckes Christian C Schumacher Helmut H Grunwald Iris Q IQ Yilmaz Umut U Schlechtriemen Thomas T Reith Wolfgang W Fassbender Klaus K

JAMA neurology 20191201 12

<h4>Importance</h4>Transferring patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) to hospitals not providing interventional treatment options is an unresolved medical problem.<h4>Objective</h4>To determine how optimized prehospital management (OPM) based on use of the Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS) compares with management in a Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) in accurately triaging patients to the appropriate hospital with (comprehensive stroke center [CSC]) or without (primar ...[more]

PMID: 31479116

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and Purpose- Prehospital routing algorithms for patients with suspected stroke because of large vessel occlusions should account for likelihood of benefit from endovascular therapy (EVT), risk of alteplase delays, and transport times. We built a mathematical model to give a real-time, location-based optimal emergency medical service routing location based on local resources, transport times, and patient characteristics. Methods- Using location, onset time, age, sex, and prehospital stroke severity, we calculated odds of a favorable outcome for a patient with suspected large vessel occlusions under 2 scenarios: direct to EVT-capable hospital versus transport to the nearest alteplase-capable hospital with transfer to EVT-capable hospital if appropriate. We project lifetime outcomes incorporating disability, quality of life utility, and cost. Multiple parameter sets of center-specific times (eg, door to alteplase) were randomly selected within a clinically plausible range to account for the model sensitivity to these estimates; for each iteration, the optimal strategy was defined as the most cost-effective outcome (threshold, $100?000 per quality-adjusted life-years gained). After 1000 simulations, the most frequently occurring optimal strategy was the final recommendation, with its strength measured as the proportion of runs for which it was optimal. Results- Routing recommendations were highly sensitive to small changes in model input parameters. Under many scenarios, the recommendations for direct transfer to the EVT site increased with increasing stroke severity and geographic proximity but did not vary substantially with respect to sex, age, or onset time. Conclusions- We present a mathematical decision model that determines ideal prehospital routing recommendations for patients with suspected stroke because of large vessel occlusions, with consideration of patient characteristics and location at onset. This model may be further refined by incorporating real-time data on traffic patterns and actual EVT and alteplase timeliness performance. Further studies are needed to verify model predictions.

Project description:ImportanceTo our knowledge, it is unknown whether a prehospital stroke triage system combining symptom severity and teleconsultation could accurately select patients for primary stroke center bypass and hasten delivery of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) without delaying intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive performance of the newly implemented Stockholm Stroke Triage System (SSTS) for large-artery occlusion (LAO) stroke and EVT initiation. Secondary objectives included evaluating whether the Stockholm Stroke Triage System shortened onset-to-puncture time for EVT and onset-to-needle time (ONT) for IVT.Design, setting, and participantsThis population-based prospective cohort study conducted from October 2017 to October 2018 across the Stockholm region (Sweden) included patients transported by first-priority ("code stroke") ambulance to the hospital for acute stroke suspected by an ambulance nurse and historical controls (October 2016-October 2017). Exclusion criteria were in-hospital stroke and helicopter or private transport. Of 2909 eligible patients, 4 (0.14%) declined participation.ExposuresPatients were assessed by ambulance nurses with positive the face-arm-speech-time test or other stroke suspicion and were evaluated for moderate-to-severe hemiparesis (≥2 National Institutes of Health stroke scale points each on the ipsilateral arm and leg [A2L2 test]). If present, the comprehensive stroke center (CSC) stroke physician was teleconsulted by phone for confirmation of stroke suspicion, assessment of EVT eligibility, and direction to CSC or the nearest primary stroke center. If absent, the nearest hospital was prenotified.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcome: LAO stroke. Secondary outcomes: EVT initiation, onset-to-puncture time, and ONT. Predictive performance measures included sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, the overall accuracy for LAO stroke, and EVT initiation.ResultsWe recorded 2905 patients with code-stroke transports (1420 women [49%]), and of these, 323 (11%) had A2L2+ teleconsultation positive results and were triaged for direct transport to CSC (median age, 73 years [interquartile range (IQR), 64-82 years]; 55 women [48%]). Accuracy for LAO stroke was 87% (positive predictive value, 41%; negative predictive value, 93%) and 91% for EVT initiation (positive predictive value, 26%; negative predictive value, 99%). Endovascular thrombectomy was performed for 84 of 323 patients (26%) with triage-positive results and 35 of 2582 patients (1.4%) with triage-negative results. In EVT cases with a known onset time (77 [3%]), the median OPT was 137 minutes (IQR, 118-180; previous year, 206 minutes [IQR, 160-280]; n = 75) (P < .001). The regional median ONT (337 [12%]) was unchanged at 115 minutes (IQR, 83-164; previous year, 115 minutes [IQR, 85-161]; n = 360) (P = .79). The median CSC IVT door-to-needle time was 13 minutes (IQR, 10-18; 116 [4%]) (previous year, 31 minutes [IQR, 19-38]; n = 45) (P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceThe Stockholm Stroke Triage System, which combines symptom severity and teleconsultation, results in markedly faster EVT delivery without delaying IVT.

Project description:Background and Purpose- We used a decision analysis approach to analyze triage strategies for patients with acute stroke symptoms while accounting for prehospital large vessel occlusion (LVO) screening methods and key time metrics. Methods- Our decision analysis compared anticipated functional outcomes for patients within the IV-tPA (intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator) treatment window in the mothership and drip-and-ship frameworks. Key branches of the model included IV-tPA eligibility, presence of an LVO, and endovascular therapy eligibility. Our decision analysis evaluated 2 prehospital LVO screening approaches: (1) no formal screening and (2) the use of clinical LVO screening scales. An excellent outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 0-1. Probabilities and workflow times were guideline-based or imputed from published studies. In sensitivity analyses, we individually and jointly varied transport time to the nearest primary stroke center, additional time required to transport directly to a comprehensive stroke center, and LVO screening scale predictive probabilities. We evaluated 2 separate scenarios: one in which ideal time metrics were achieved and one under current real-world metrics. Results- In the ideal metrics scenario, the drip-and-ship strategy was almost always favored in the absence of formal LVO screening. For patients screened positive for an LVO, mothership was favored if the additional transport time to the comprehensive stroke center was <3 to 23 minutes. Under real-world conditions, in which primary stroke center workflow is slower than ideal, the mothership strategy was favored in more scenarios, regardless of formal LVO screening. For example, mothership was favored with an additional transport time to the comprehensive stroke center of <32 to 99 minutes for patients screened positive for an LVO and <28 to 39 minutes in the absence of screening. Conclusions- Joint consideration of LVO probability, screening, workflow times, and transport times may improve prehospital stroke triage. Drip-and-ship was more favorable when more ideal primary stroke center workflow times were modeled.

Project description:BackgroundStudies investigating the Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) concept have shown increased thrombolysis rates, reduced alarm-to-treatment times and improved prehospital triage. Yet, so far, there is no definite scientific proof of better functional outcome after MSU deployment compared to regular ambulances.MethodsWe provide a revised protocol for the second part of the B_PROUD trial as organization of the MSU dispatch did not meet the anticipated standards in the first part. B_PROUD is a pragmatic, prospective study comparing functional outcomes of treatment candidates with or without MSU care. Treatment candidates are defined as patients with a final diagnosis of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, onset-to-dispatch-times ≤4 h, disabling symptoms not resolved at time of ambulance arrival, and the ability to ambulate prior to the qualifying event. These patients are included if their emergency call prompted a stroke alarm at the dispatch center during MSU operation hours (7 am-11 pm, Monday-Sunday) and if the emergency is located within the MSU operation area in Berlin, Germany. The intervention group consists of patients who are cared for by the MSU. When the MSU is already in operation for another emergency, MSU dispatches are handled by regular ambulances (about 45%). These dispatches create the control group. Blinded stroke physicians assess the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score in recorded structured interviews 3 months after stroke. The primary outcome is the degree of disability and death over the full range of the mRS. As a change to the previously published protocol and only pertinent in case of more than 9% lost-to-follow-up, a co-primary outcome was introduced consisting of the proportions of death, new institutional care or severe disability in patients with additional use of information from registration offices.PerspectiveThe results will inform parties involved in acute stroke care organization on the effectiveness of the MSU concept.Trial registrationThe protocol is registered in (NCT03931616) and has been approved by the ethical review committee of the Charité - University Medicine Berlin (EA4/109/15) on September 2, 2015. The study protocol of B_PROUD part 1 had been published in the International Journal of Stroke as "Berlin Prehospital Or Usual Delivery of acute stroke care (B_PROUD) - study protocol" (doi: 10.1177/1747493017700152) on March 22, 2017 [1] previous to first patient's registration.

Project description:ImportanceSo far, uncertainty remains as to whether there is sufficient cumulative evidence that mobile stroke unit (MSU; specialized ambulance equipped with computed tomography scanner, point-of-care laboratory, and neurological expertise) use leads to better functional outcomes compared with usual care.ObjectiveTo determine with a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature whether MSU use is associated with better functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).Data sourcesMEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase from 1960 to 2021.Study selectionStudies comparing MSU deployment and usual care for patients with suspected stroke were eligible for analysis, excluding case series and case-control studies.Data extraction and synthesisIndependent data extraction by 2 observers, following the PRISMA and MOOSE reporting guidelines. The risk of bias in each study was determined using the ROBINS-I and RoB2 tools. In the case of articles with partially overlapping study populations, unpublished disentangled results were obtained. Data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was excellent outcome as measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS; score of 0 to 1 at 90 days).ResultsCompared with usual care, MSU use was associated with excellent outcome (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.27-2.13; P < .001; 5 studies; n = 3228), reduced disability over the full range of the mRS (adjusted common OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.14-1.70; P = .001; 3 studies; n = 1563), good outcome (mRS score of 0 to 2: crude OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09-1.44; P = .001; 6 studies; n = 3266), shorter onset-to-intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) times (median reduction, 31 minutes [95% CI, 23-39]; P < .001; 13 studies; n = 3322), delivery of IVT (crude OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.58-2.12; P < .001; 7 studies; n = 4790), and IVT within 60 minutes of symptom onset (crude OR, 7.71; 95% CI, 4.17-14.25; P < .001; 8 studies; n = 3351). MSU use was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality at 7 days or at 90 days or with higher proportions of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after IVT.Conclusions and relevanceCompared with usual care, MSU use was associated with an approximately 65% increase in the odds of excellent outcome and a 30-minute reduction in onset-to-IVT times, without safety concerns. These results should help guideline writing committees and policy makers.

Project description:IntroductionThe efficacy of both intravenous treatment (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT) for patients with acute ischaemic stroke strongly declines over time. Only a subset of patients with ischaemic stroke caused by an intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation can benefit from EVT. Several prehospital stroke scales were developed to identify patients that are likely to have an LVO, which could allow for direct transportation of EVT eligible patients to an endovascular-capable centre without delaying IVT for the other patients. We aim to prospectively validate these prehospital stroke scales simultaneously to assess their accuracy in predicting LVO in the prehospital setting.Methods and analysisPrehospital triage of patients with suspected stroke symptoms (PRESTO) is a prospective multicentre observational cohort study in the southwest of the Netherlands including adult patients with suspected stroke in the ambulance. The paramedic will assess a combination of items from five prehospital stroke scales, without changing the normal workflow. Primary outcome is the clinical diagnosis of an acute ischaemic stroke with an intracranial LVO in the anterior circulation. Additional hospital data concerning the diagnosis and provided treatment will be collected by chart review. Logistic regression analysis will be performed, and performance of the prehospital stroke scales will be expressed as sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operator curve.Ethics and disseminationThe Institutional Review Board of the Erasmus MC University Medical Centre has reviewed the study protocol and confirmed that the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) is not applicable. The findings of this study will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The best performing scale, or the simplest scale in case of clinical equipoise, will be integrated in a decision model with other clinical characteristics and real-life driving times to improve prehospital triage of suspected stroke patients.Trial registration numberNTR7595.

Dataset Information

Prehospital Stroke Management Optimized by Use of Clinical Scoring vs Mobile Stroke Unit for Triage of Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance

Objective

Design, setting, and participants

Interventions

Main outcomes and measures

Results

Conclusions and relevance

Trial registration

Publications

Prehospital Stroke Management Optimized by Use of Clinical Scoring vs Mobile Stroke Unit for Triage of Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets