Response to Selective RET Inhibition With LOXO-292 in a Patient With RET Fusion-Positive Lung Cancer With Leptomeningeal Metastases.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Guo R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6724540 | biostudies-literature | 2019
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Response to Selective RET Inhibition With LOXO-292 in a Patient With <i>RET</i> Fusion-Positive Lung Cancer With Leptomeningeal Metastases.
Guo Robin R Schreyer Mark M Chang Jason C JC Rothenberg S Michael SM Henry Dahlia D Cotzia Paolo P Kris Mark G MG Rekhtman Natasha N Young Robert J RJ Hyman David M DM Drilon Alexander A
JCO precision oncology 20190603
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8140803 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7608524 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Abstract The RET receptor tyrosine kinase proto-oncogene is activated by somatic or germline mutations in a majority of medullary thyroid cancers (MTC). However, treatment of MTC has been challenging due to the lack of effective and tolerable RET-specific therapy, thus testing tumors for the presence of somatic RET mutation has not been warranted. In a first-in-human, phase 1/2 clinical trial (LIBRETTO-001, NCT03157128), selpercatinib (LOXO-292), an investigational, highly selective, potent small molecule RET kinase inhibitor, demonstrated significant and durable anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced RET-mutant MTC or with diverse RET fusion-positive cancers (1). Among the primary analysis set of patients with RET-mutant MTC previously treated with cabozantinib and/or vandetanib (N=55), the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 was 56% (95% CI 42.3-69.7, n=31/55). Duration of response was not reached with a 10.6-months median follow-up (data cutoff date 17-Jun-2019). Here, we evaluated investigator-assessed ORR per RECIST 1.1 and clinical benefit rate (CBR) in this previously treated patient population by RET alteration and by germline or somatic testing used for enrollment. The ORR remained consistent across subgroups with RET M918T (49%, 95% CI 30.8-66.5, n=16/33), V804M/L gatekeeper mutations (60%, 95% CI 14.7-94.7, n=3/5), extracellular cysteine mutations (43%, 95% CI 9.9-81.6, n=3/7), other mutations (90%, 95% CI 55.5-99.7, n=9/10), and germline (50%, 95% CI 6.8-93.2, n=2/4) or somatic (57%, 95% CI 42.2-70.7, n=29/51) testing. The CBR, defined as the proportion of patients with best overall response of confirmed complete response, confirmed or unconfirmed partial response, or stable disease lasting 16 weeks or more, in this patient set was 87% (95% CI 75.5-94.7, n=48/55). The CBR remained consistent across subgroups with RET M918T (88%, 95% CI 71.8-96.6, n=29/33), V804M/L gatekeeper mutations (80%, 95% CI 28.4-99.5, n=4/5), extracellular cysteine mutations (71%, 95% CI 29.0-96.3, n=5/7), other mutations (100%, 95% CI 69.2-100.0, n=10/10), and germline (75%, 95% CI 19.4-99.4, n=3/4) or somatic (88%, 95% CI 76.1-95.6, n=45/51) testing. The primary technologies used to identify RET alterations were tumor next-generation sequencing (n=43) and polymerase chain reaction (n=9). As previously reported, selpercatinib was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile (1). These results indicate broad anti-tumor activity for selpercatinib in patients with RET-mutant MTC irrespective of the specific RET mutation, and support implementation of RET mutation testing for patients with advanced MTC, including somatic testing, to identify patients who may benefit from selpercatinib. Reference: (1) Wirth et al., Ann Oncol. 2019 Oct; 30(supplement 5): v933.
| S-EPMC7208240 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7450975 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Multi-kinase RET inhibitors, such as cabozantinib and RXDX-105, are active in lung cancer patients with RET fusions; however, the overall response rates to these two drugs are unsatisfactory compared to other targeted therapy paradigms. Moreover, these inhibitors may have different efficacies against RET rearrangements depending on the upstream fusion partner. A comprehensive preclinical analysis of the efficacy of RET inhibitors is lacking due to a paucity of disease models harboring RET rearrangements. Here we generated two new patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, one new patient-derived cell line, one PDX-derived cell line, and several isogenic cell lines with RET fusions. Using these models, we re-examined the efficacy and mechanism of action of cabozantinib and found that this RET inhibitor was effective at blocking growth of cell lines, activating caspase 3/7 and inhibiting activation of ERK and AKT. Cabozantinib treatment of mice bearing RET-fusion-positive cell line xenografts and two PDXs significantly reduced tumor proliferation without adverse toxicity. Moreover, cabozantinib was effective at reducing growth of a lung cancer PDX that was not responsive to RXDX-105. Transcriptomic analysis of lung tumors and cell lines with RET alterations showed activation of a MYC signature and this was suppressed by treatment of cell lines with cabozantinib. MYC protein levels were rapidly depleted following cabozantinib treatment. Taken together, our results demonstrate that cabozantinib is an effective agent in preclinical models harboring RET rearrangements with three different 5' fusion partners (CCDC6, KIF5B and TRIM33). Notably, we identify MYC as a protein that is upregulated by RET expression and down-regulated by cabozantinib treatment, opening up potentially new therapeutic avenues for combinatorial targeting RET-fusion driven lung cancers. The novel RET fusion-dependent preclinical models described herein represent valuable tools for further refinement of current therapies and the evaluation of novel therapeutic strategies.
| S-EPMC7888717 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We present a 54-year-old White male with a diagnosis of stage IV pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. Next-generation sequencing of the tumor/blood identified a complex tumor genome, which included a rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusion. The patient initially received cytotoxic chemotherapy with a significant radiographic response. After 4 cycles of chemotherapy, the patient was transitioned to a clinical trial using selpercatinib, a RET inhibitor, as maintenance therapy. Unfortunately, our patient developed progression of disease at the first treatment monitoring scan. Our patient suffered primary resistance to RET-targeted therapy. Proposed mechanisms of resistance include intrinsic resistance of the nuclear receptor co-activator 4-RET fusion to RET inhibition, the RET fusion representing a passenger alteration to another tumorigenic driver pathway and/or decreased efficacy of RET inhibition after platinum-based chemotherapy. Our patient's clinical course highlights the fact that "actionable" genomic alterations do not always equate to patient benefit.
| S-EPMC11783290 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe RET proto-oncogene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase that is activated by gene fusion in 1%-2% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and rarely in other cancer types. Selpercatinib is a highly selective RET kinase inhibitor that has recently been approved by the FDA in lung and thyroid cancers with activating RET gene fusions and mutations. Molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance to selpercatinib are poorly understood.Patients and methodsWe studied patients treated on the first-in-human clinical trial of selpercatinib (NCT03157129) who were found to have MET amplification associated with resistance to selpercatinib. We validated MET activation as a targetable mediator of resistance to RET-directed therapy, and combined selpercatinib with the MET/ALK/ROS1 inhibitor crizotinib in a series of single patient protocols (SPP).ResultsMET amplification was identified in posttreatment biopsies in 4 patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC treated with selpercatinib. In at least one case, MET amplification was clearly evident prior to therapy with selpercatinib. We demonstrate that increased MET expression in RET fusion-positive tumor cells causes resistance to selpercatinib, and this can be overcome by combining selpercatinib with crizotinib. Using SPPs, selpercatinib with crizotinib were given together generating anecdotal evidence of clinical activity and tolerability, with one response lasting 10 months.ConclusionsThrough the use of SPPs, we were able to offer combination therapy targeting MET-amplified resistance identified on the first-in-human study of selpercatinib. These data suggest that MET dependence is a recurring and potentially targetable mechanism of resistance to selective RET inhibition in advanced NSCLC.
| S-EPMC8009613 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeRearranged during transfection (RET) fusions are important genetic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Selective RET inhibitors are setting a new paradigm in RET-driven NSCLC. However, the real-world treatment patterns, outcomes and toxicity remain largely unknown.MethodsData from RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients treated in our centre were retrospectively analysed. Of them, patients diagnosed before and after August 2018 were included in analysis of treatment patterns; and patients received selective RET inhibitors were eligible for analysis of adverse events (AEs).ResultsPatients diagnosed before August 2018 (n = 30) predominantly received chemotherapy and immunotherapy (83%) as initial therapy, while patients diagnosed after August 2018 (n = 39) mainly received selective RET inhibitors (38.5% at first-line; 50.0% at second-line). In the total 69 patients, overall survival (OS) was prolonged in patients treated with selective RET inhibitors versus untreated patients (median 34.3 versus 17.5 months; p = 0.002) during a median follow-up of 28.7 months. But there was no difference between patients treated with immunotherapy versus untreated patients. In the 38 patients received selective RET inhibition, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.9 months. AEs ≥ grade 3 occurred in 42.1% patients and were not associated with PFS (p = 0.63) or OS (p = 0.60). Haematological toxicity ≥ grade 3 occurred in 31.6% patients and was the leading cause of drug discontinuation.ConclusionSelective RET inhibitors are increasingly being adopted into clinical practice and are associated with improved OS. However, treatment-related ≥ grade 3 AEs, especially haematologic AEs, occur frequently in real-world setting.
| S-EPMC10314840 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusions are a validated target in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RET-selective inhibitors selpercatinib (LOXO-292) and pralsetinib (BLU-667) recently demonstrated favorable antitumor activity and safety profiles in advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC, and both have received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication. Insights into mechanisms of resistance to selective RET inhibitors remain limited.Patients and methodsThis study was performed at five institutions. Tissue and/or cell-free DNA was obtained from patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC after treatment with selpercatinib or pralsetinib and assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) or MET FISH.ResultsWe analyzed a total of 23 post-treatment tissue and/or plasma biopsies from 18 RET fusion-positive patients who received an RET-selective inhibitor (selpercatinib, n = 10; pralsetinib, n = 7; pralsetinib followed by selpercatinib, n = 1, with biopsy after each inhibitor). Three cases had paired tissue and plasma samples, of which one also had two serial resistant tissue specimens. The median progression-free survival on RET inhibitors was 6.3 months [95% confidence interval 3.6-10.8 months]. Acquired RET mutations were identified in two cases (10%), both affecting the RET G810 residue in the kinase solvent front. Three resistant cases (15%) harbored acquired MET amplification without concurrent RET resistance mutations, and one specimen had acquired KRAS amplification. No other canonical driver alterations were identified by NGS. Among 16 resistant tumor specimens, none had evidence of squamous or small-cell histologic transformation.ConclusionsRET solvent front mutations are a recurrent mechanism of RET inhibitor resistance, although they occurred at a relatively low frequency. The majority of resistance to selective RET inhibition may be driven by RET-independent resistance such as acquired MET or KRAS amplification. Next-generation RET inhibitors with potency against RET resistance mutations and combination strategies are needed to effectively overcome resistance in these patients.
| S-EPMC9538591 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRearranged during transfection (RET) fusion-positive occurs in approximately 2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This mutation often predicts metastasis risk and poor prognosis, and current mainstream therapies provide limited patient benefit. Selective RET inhibitors Pralsetinib and Selpercatinib are targeted drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treating RET-mutated tumors. The phase I/II clinical trial results of their treatment of NSCLC have been published. However, the clinical effect of selective RET inhibitors on RET fusion-positive NSCLC remains controversial. Purpose Meta-analysis was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of selective RET inhibitors in treating RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Methods Qualified literature was searched in Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), disease control rate (DCR), intracranial ORR, and adverse events. Stata 15.1 software was used to analyze the data. Results A total of 8 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The combined results showed that the ORR of patients treated with selective RET inhibitors was 67% (95% confidence interval:0.64 to 0.70, P < 0.01), DCR was 92% (95%CI: 0.91-0.94, P < 0.01), the mPFS was 16.09 months (95%CI: 11.66-20.52, P < 0.01). In treated patients with RET mutation, the intracranial ORR was 86% (95%CI:0.74 ~ 0.96, P < 0.01). ORR in untreated patients was more effective than untreated patients [HR = 0.44 (95%CI: 0.35-0.56, P < 0.01)]. The major adverse events (grade 3-4) are neutropenia (13%) and anaemia (13%). Conclusions Selective RET inhibitors Pralsetinib and Selpercatinib have shown a good effect on RET fusion-positive NSCLC, with a low incidence of adverse events.
| S-EPMC10560178 | biostudies-literature