Dataset Information

GFR Slope as a Surrogate End Point for Kidney Disease Progression in Clinical Trials: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Effects of Randomized Controlled Trials.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Surrogate end points are needed to assess whether treatments are effective in the early stages of CKD. GFR decline leads to kidney failure, but regulators have not approved using differences in the change in GFR from the beginning to the end of a randomized, controlled trial as an end point in CKD because it is not clear whether small changes in the GFR slope will translate to clinical benefits. METHODS:To assess the use of GFR slope as a surrogate end point for CKD progression, we performed a meta-analysis of 47 RCTs that tested 12 interventions in 60,620 subjects. We estimated treatment effects on GFR slope (mean difference in GFR slope between the randomized groups), for the total slope starting at baseline, chronic slope starting at 3 months after randomization, and on the clinical end point (doubling of serum creatinine, GFR<15 ml/min per 1.73 m2, or ESKD) for each study. We used Bayesian mixed-effects analyses to describe the association of treatment effects on GFR slope with the clinical end point and to test how well the GFR slope predicts a treatment's effect on the clinical end point. RESULTS:Across all studies, the treatment effect on 3-year total GFR slope (median R 2=0.97; 95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI], 0.78 to 1.00) and on the chronic slope (R 2 0.96; 95% BCI, 0.63 to 1.00) accurately predicted treatment effects on the clinical end point. With a sufficient sample size, a treatment effect of 0.75 ml/min per 1.73 m2/yr or greater on total slope over 3 years or chronic slope predicts a clinical benefit on CKD progress with at least 96% probability. CONCLUSIONS:With large enough sample sizes, GFR slope may be a viable surrogate for clinical end points in CKD RCTs.

SUBMITTER: Inker LA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6727261 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

GFR Slope as a Surrogate End Point for Kidney Disease Progression in Clinical Trials: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Effects of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Inker Lesley A LA Heerspink Hiddo J L HJL Tighiouart Hocine H Levey Andrew S AS Coresh Josef J Gansevoort Ron T RT Simon Andrew L AL Ying Jian J Beck Gerald J GJ Wanner Christoph C Floege Jürgen J Li Philip Kam-Tao PK Perkovic Vlado V Vonesh Edward F EF Greene Tom T

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN 20190710 9

<h4>Background</h4>Surrogate end points are needed to assess whether treatments are effective in the early stages of CKD. GFR decline leads to kidney failure, but regulators have not approved using differences in the change in GFR from the beginning to the end of a randomized, controlled trial as an end point in CKD because it is not clear whether small changes in the GFR slope will translate to clinical benefits.<h4>Methods</h4>To assess the use of GFR slope as a surrogate end point for CKD pro ...[more]

PMID: 31292197

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rationale & objectiveThere are few data on the absolute effects of sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, despite their importance in treatment decision making. We investigated absolute treatment effects according to baseline kidney disease status.Study designMeta-analysis.Study populationsAdults with type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or heart failure.Selection criteria for studiesRandomized controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors (10 trials to November 20, 2020) for clinical outcomes of kidney disease progression, heart failure events, and major cardiovascular events.Data extractionPublications of 10 trials to November 20, 2020.Analytical approachThe incidence rate difference (IRD) between SGLT2 inhibitor and placebo was compared across estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) subgroups.ResultsSubgroup analyses included data from seven trials (61,821 participants with diabetes or chronic kidney disease). SGLT2 inhibitor treatment, in eGFR subgroups of <45, 45 to <60, and ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, reduced 16.0, 9.5, and 1.9 heart failure events per 1,000 patient-year, respectively (P < 0.001 for heterogeneity). In urine UACR subgroups of >300, 30 to 300, and <30 mg/g, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced 17.3, 1.4, and 2.2 kidney disease events per 1,000 patient-year, respectively (P < 0.001 for heterogeneity), and 14.8, 8.7, and 2.1 heart failure events per 1,000 patient-year, respectively (P = 0.006 for heterogeneity). The pooled IRDs for major cardiovascular events were also greater in lower eGFR or overt albuminuria subgroups. In secondary analyses, risk differences calculated using pooled baseline and relative risks were comparable to the pooled IRDs, while the relative risk reductions for kidney and heart failure outcomes were consistent across the subgroups. For treatment-related harms, IRDs were similar between eGFR subgroups.LimitationsStudy-level data rather than individual patient data were used.ConclusionsSGLT2 inhibitor treatment resulted in greater reductions of cardiovascular events in patients with lower eGFR and higher albuminuria and had substantially greater absolute benefits of renoprotection in patients with overt albuminuria than in their counterparts.

Project description:ImportanceA surrogate end point (SEP) is an end point used in clinical trials as an alternative for measuring the true clinical benefit. The use of SEPs in trials shortens their duration.ObjectivesTo investigate the use of SEPs in clinical trials to support the approval of anticancer drugs and to determine whether confirmatory studies that use overall survival (OS) as an end point are being conducted in Japan.Design, setting, and participantsIn this cross-sectional study, drug approvals and background information were obtained from publicly available information, such as the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency website, for anticancer drugs approved in Japan from January 2001 to December 2020. Data analysis was performed from September 2021 to March 2022.Main outcomes and measuresCharacteristics of approved oncology drugs in Japan, end points for pivotal clinical trials, and outcomes of confirmatory trials using OS as an end point following drug approval.ResultsThere were 299 anticancer drugs approved in Japan during the study period. Of these, 142 (47.5%) were molecular-targeted drugs, the most common of which targeted non-small cell lung cancer. There were 111 (37.1%) anticancer drugs with orphan designation. From 2001 to 2005, OS was used as an end point in 1 approval (3.6%); however, from 2006 to 2020, OS was used in 86 approvals (31.7%). Of the 212 anticancer drugs approved on the basis of SEPs, confirmatory studies with OS as the end point were conducted for only 37 approvals (17.5%); for the remaining 175 approvals, studies are under way for 35 approvals (16.5%), were waivered for 75 approvals (35.4%), and were not conducted for 65 approvals (30.7%). Furthermore, in 20 drug approvals (9.4%), the conducted confirmatory studies were not effective in determining the OS, but the drugs were approved following re-examination.Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this study suggest that starting from 2005, the use of OS as an end point has increased in studies supporting the approval of anticancer drugs in Japan. However, even after 2005, approximately two-thirds of these approvals were SEP based. Postmarketing surveillance studies of the true end points are necessary to validate the use of SEPs.

Project description:ImportanceThe Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) recommended that progression-free survival (PFS) can serve as a primary end point instead of overall survival (OS) in advanced ovarian cancer. Evidence is lacking for the validity of PFS as a surrogate marker of OS in the modern era of different treatment types.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether PFS is a surrogate end point for OS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.Data sourcesIn September 2016, a comprehensive search of publications in MEDLINE was conducted for randomized clinical trials of systematic treatment in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. The GCIG groups were also queried for potentially completed but unpublished trials.Study selectionStudies with a minimum sample size of 60 patients published since 2001 with PFS and OS rates available were eligible. Investigational treatments considered included initial, maintenance, and intensification therapy consisting of agents delivered at a higher dose and/or frequency compared with that in the control arm.Data extraction and synthesisUsing the meta-analytic approach on randomized clinical trials published from January 1, 2001, through September 25, 2016, correlations between PFS and OS at the individual level were estimated using the Kendall τ model; between-treatment effects on PFS and OS at the trial level were estimated using the Plackett copula bivariate (R2) model. Criteria for PFS surrogacy required R2 ≥ 0.80 at the trial level. Analysis was performed from January 7 through March 20, 2019.Main outcomes and measuresOverall survival and PFS based on measurement of cancer antigen 125 levels confirmed by radiological examination results or by combined GCIG criteria.ResultsIn this meta-analysis of 17 unique randomized trials of standard (n = 7), intensification (n = 5), and maintenance (n = 5) chemotherapies or targeted treatments with data from 11 029 unique patients (median age, 58 years [range, 18-88 years]), a high correlation was found between PFS and OS at the individual level (τ = 0.724; 95% CI, 0.717-0.732), but a low correlation was found at the trial level (R2 = 0.24; 95% CI, 0-0.59). Subgroup analyses led to similar results. In the external validation, 14 of the 16 hazard ratios for OS in the published reports fell within the 95% prediction interval from PFS.Conclusions and relevanceThis large meta-analysis of individual patient data did not establish PFS as a surrogate end point for OS in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, but the analysis was limited by the narrow range of treatment effects observed or by poststudy treatment. These results suggest that if PFS is chosen as a primary end point, OS must be measured as a secondary end point.

Dataset Information

GFR Slope as a Surrogate End Point for Kidney Disease Progression in Clinical Trials: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Effects of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Publications

GFR Slope as a Surrogate End Point for Kidney Disease Progression in Clinical Trials: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Effects of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets