Dataset Information

To Get Back on Track: A Qualitative Study on Childless Women's Expectations on Future Fertility Before Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In Sweden, 4700 women seek bariatric surgery annually, many of those being nulliparous. Anovulation is common among obese women, but bariatric surgery is not considered a treatment for infertility. The aim of this study was to explore the motives of women in fertile age for seeking bariatric surgery and their expectations on future fertility.

Materials and methods

A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews with childless women (n?=?12) aged 20 to 35?years. Interviews were conducted 1 to 3?weeks prior to surgery, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed with thematic analysis.

Results

"To get back on track" was identified as a master theme with 3 underlying subthemes, with the following headings: "A better me," "A fertile me," and "A pregnant me." The participants were hoping that weight-loss would make them feel more content with themselves, break isolation, and make it easier to find a partner. The participants considered fertility to improve after bariatric surgery, mainly based on stories from other patients of bariatric surgery. Having a child was expressed to be of great importance to them.

Conclusions

Even though obese young women do not seek bariatric surgery for fertility reasons alone, there is a general perception of enhanced fertility after surgery, which is regarded as positive and important.

SUBMITTER: Nilsson-Condori E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6734615 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

To Get Back on Track: A Qualitative Study on Childless Women's Expectations on Future Fertility Before Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

Nilsson-Condori Emma E Järvholm Stina S Thurin-Kjellberg Ann A Sidlovskaja Ilona I Hedenbro Jan L JL Friberg Britt B

Clinical medicine insights. Reproductive health 20190909

<h4>Background</h4>In Sweden, 4700 women seek bariatric surgery annually, many of those being nulliparous. Anovulation is common among obese women, but bariatric surgery is not considered a treatment for infertility. The aim of this study was to explore the motives of women in fertile age for seeking bariatric surgery and their expectations on future fertility.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews with childless women (<i>n</i> = 12) aged 20 to 35 year ...[more]

PMID: 31523138

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPremenopausal breast cancer patients are at risk of treatment-related infertility. Many patients do not receive sufficient fertility information before treatment. As such, our team developed and alpha tested the Begin Exploring Fertility Options, Risks, and Expectations decision aid (BEFORE DA).MethodsThe BEFORE DA development process was guided by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Our team used integrated knowledge translation by collaborating with multiple stakeholders throughout the development process including breast cancer survivors, multi-disciplinary health care providers (HCPs), advocates, and cancer organization representatives. Based on previously conducted literature reviews and a needs assessment by our team - we developed a paper prototype. The paper prototype was finalized at an engagement meeting with stakeholders and created into a graphically designed paper and mirrored online decision aid. Alpha testing was conducted with new and previously engaged stakeholders through a questionnaire, telephone interviews, or focus group. Iterative reviews followed each step in the development process to ensure a wide range of stakeholder input.ResultsOur team developed an 18-page paper prototype containing information deemed valuable by stakeholders for fertility decision-making. The engagement meeting brought together 28 stakeholders to finalize the prototype. Alpha testing of the paper and online BEFORE DA occurred with 17 participants. Participants found the BEFORE DA usable, acceptable, and most provided enthusiastic support for its use with premenopausal breast cancer patients facing a fertility decision. Participants also identified areas for improvement including clarifying content/messages and modifying the design/photos. The final BEFORE DA is a 32-page paper and mirrored online decision aid ( https://fertilityaid.rethinkbreastcancer.com ). The BEFORE DA includes information on fertility, fertility options before/after treatment, values clarification, question list, next steps, glossary and reference list, and tailored information on the cost of fertility preservation and additional resources by geographic location.ConclusionThe BEFORE DA, designed in collaboration with stakeholders, is a new tool for premenopausal breast cancer patients and HCPs to assist with fertility discussions and decision-making. The BEFORE DA helps to fill the information gap as it is a tool that HCPs can refer patients to for supplementary information surrounding fertility.

Project description:ImportanceAmong women and men with severe obesity, evidence for improvement in urinary incontinence beyond the first year after bariatric surgery-induced weight loss is lacking.ObjectivesTo examine change in urinary incontinence before and after bariatric surgery and to identify factors associated with improvement and remission among women and men in the first 3 years after bariatric surgery.Design, setting, and participantsThe Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery 2 is an observational cohort study at 10 US hospitals in 6 geographically diverse clinical centers. Participants were recruited between February 21, 2005, and February 17, 2009. Adults undergoing first-time bariatric surgical procedures as part of clinical care by participating surgeons between March 14, 2006, and April 24, 2009, were followed up for 3 years (through October 24, 2012).InterventionParticipants undergoing bariatric surgery completed research assessments before the procedure and annually thereafter.Main outcomes and measuresThe frequency and type of urinary incontinence episodes in the past 3 months were assessed using a validated questionnaire. Prevalent urinary incontinence was defined as at least weekly urinary incontinence episodes, and remission was defined as change from prevalent urinary incontinence at baseline to less than weekly urinary incontinence episodes at follow-up.ResultsOf 2458 participants, 1987 (80.8%) completed baseline and follow-up assessments. At baseline, the median age was 47 years (age range, 18-78 years), the median body mass index was 46 kg/m2 (range, 34-94 kg/m2), and 1565 of 1987 (78.8%) were women. Urinary incontinence was more prevalent among women (49.3%; 95% CI, 46.9%-51.9%) than men (21.8%; 95% CI, 18.2%-26.1%) (P < .001). After a mean 1-year weight loss of 29.5% (95% CI, 29.0%-30.1%) in women and 27.0% (95% CI, 25.9%-28.6%) in men, year 1 urinary incontinence prevalence was significantly lower among women (18.3%; 95% CI, 16.4%-20.4%) and men (9.8%; 95% CI, 7.2%-13.4%) (P < .001 for all). The 3-year prevalence was higher than the 1-year prevalence for both sexes (24.8%; 95% CI, 21.8%-26.5% among women and 12.2%; 95% CI, 9.0%-16.4% among men) but was substantially lower than baseline (P < .001 for all). Weight loss was independently related to urinary incontinence remission (relative risk, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.10 in women and 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13 in men) per 5% weight loss, as were younger age and the absence of a severe walking limitation.Conclusions and relevanceAmong women and men with severe obesity, bariatric surgery was associated with substantially reduced urinary incontinence over 3 years. Improvement in urinary incontinence may be an important benefit of bariatric surgery.

Project description:ImportancePrevious research suggests that clinicians view realistic patient expectations as the most important nonaudiological factor in the decision to proceed with a cochlear implant (CI). However, clinicians have few data to determine whether patients' outcome expectations are realistic.ObjectiveTo address this unmet clinical need through the development and psychometric analysis of a new patient-reported outcome measure, the CI Quality of Life (CIQOL) Expectations.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary CI center from February 26, 2020, to August 31, 2021. First, a team comprising 2 CI audiologists, a CI surgeon, a hearing scientist, and 2 psychometricians with experience in instrument development converted all items from the CIQOL-35 Profile instrument into statements reflecting expected outcomes. Then, cognitive interviews with 20 potential CI users assessed the clarity and comprehensiveness of the new instrument. Next, responses to the CIQOL-Expectations instrument for 131 potential adult CI candidates were psychometrically analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Finally, degree to which patient expectations changed from before to after and their CI evaluation appointments was measured.InterventionThe CIQOL-Expectations instrument.ResultsOf 178 participants, 85 (47.8%) were female, and there was 1 (0.6%) Asian, 26 (14.6%) Black or African American, 1 (0.6%) Latinx, and 150 (84.3%) White individuals. No major content or grammar changes were identified during the cognitive interviews. Overall, all CIQOL domains demonstrated adequate to strong psychometric properties. Several domains did not meet all a priori established indicators of model fit or ability to separate CI users based on response patterns, but all met most indicators. Potential CI users demonstrated the highest mean (SD) expectation scores for the environment (70.2 [20.8]) and social (68.4 [18.0]) domains. In addition, the entertainment (20 [15.3%]) and environment (31 [24.4%]) domains had the highest percentage of patients with expectation scores of 100. Yet, normative CIQOL-35 Profile data from experienced CI users suggested few patients obtain this high degree of functional benefit after implant.Conclusions and relevanceThe results of this cross-sectional study suggest that the CIQOL-Expectations instrument may provide an opportunity to assess potential CI users' expected outcomes using modification of an established CIQOL instrument and a patient-centered framework. The included items and domains reflect real-world functional abilities valued by CI users and may provide opportunities for an evidence-based shared decision-making approach to the CI evaluation process. With this instrument, clinicians can compare individual patients' pre-CI outcome expectations with established normative data and provide appropriate counseling.

Dataset Information

To Get Back on Track: A Qualitative Study on Childless Women's Expectations on Future Fertility Before Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

Background

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

To Get Back on Track: A Qualitative Study on Childless Women's Expectations on Future Fertility Before Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets