Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Considerable controversy exists on the association between serum vitamin D concentrations and Alzheimer disease (AD) risk. This study aimed to synthesize the association of serum vitamin D concentrations with AD in adults.Methods
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched for prospective cohort studies with data on serum vitamin D concentrations and AD risk.Result
The studies that reported the adjusted relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of AD associated with serum vitamin D concentrations were included and subjected to subgroup analyses. Six prospective cohort studies with 1607 AD cases and 21,692 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. In 4 cohort studies with information about serum vitamin D concentrations <25 and 25 to 50?nmol/L, the random effects summary estimate did not show an increased risk of AD after adjustment for the established risk factors, while 3 cohort studies reported the RRs for incident AD per standard deviation (SD) decrease in serum vitamin D concentration and the random effects summary estimate did not show an increased risk of AD after adjustment for the established risk factors.Conclusions
The current meta-analysis indicated that serum vitamin D deficiency (<25?nmol/L) or insufficiency (25-50?nmol/L) was not statistically significant and associated with the risk of AD.
SUBMITTER: Yang K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6736453 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Yang Kui K Chen Jun J Li Xiaoguang X Zhou Yongning Y
Medicine 20190801 35
<h4>Background</h4>Considerable controversy exists on the association between serum vitamin D concentrations and Alzheimer disease (AD) risk. This study aimed to synthesize the association of serum vitamin D concentrations with AD in adults.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched for prospective cohort studies with data on serum vitamin D concentrations and AD risk.<h4>Result</h4>The studies that reported the adjusted relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence ...[more]