Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Evaluation of environmental cleaning of patient rooms: Impact of different fluorescent gel markers.


ABSTRACT: In this systematic evaluation of fluorescent gel markers (FGM) applied to high-touch surfaces with a metered applicator (MA) made for the purpose versus a generic cotton swab (CS), removal rates were 60.5% (476 of 787) for the MA and 64.3% (506 of 787) for the CS. MA-FGM removal interpretation was more consistent, 83% versus 50% not removed, possibly due to less varied application and more adhesive gel.

SUBMITTER: Rock C 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6736514 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Evaluation of environmental cleaning of patient rooms: Impact of different fluorescent gel markers.

Rock Clare C   Xie Anping A   Andonian Jennifer J   Hsu Yea-Jen YJ   Osei Patience P   Keller Sara C SC   Gurses Ayse P AP   Trexler Polly P   Maragakis Lisa L LL   Cosgrove Sara E SE  

Infection control and hospital epidemiology 20181113 1


In this systematic evaluation of fluorescent gel markers (FGM) applied to high-touch surfaces with a metered applicator (MA) made for the purpose versus a generic cotton swab (CS), removal rates were 60.5% (476 of 787) for the MA and 64.3% (506 of 787) for the CS. MA-FGM removal interpretation was more consistent, 83% versus 50% not removed, possibly due to less varied application and more adhesive gel. ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6619417 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4097690 | biostudies-literature
2009-01-16 | GSE4855 | GEO
2010-05-06 | E-GEOD-4855 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC8775027 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8785946 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5873029 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7253364 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8312159 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5784118 | biostudies-literature