Dataset Information

Knowledge of professional healthcare providers about sickle cell disease: Impact of a distance education course.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To assess the impact of the distance education course "Sickle Cell Disease: Primary Health Care Line" on knowledge acquisition of professional healthcare providers.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with a quantitative approach at the Educational and Support Center for Hemoglobinopathies (Cehmob-MG), state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, in 2016. One hundred and fifty-three out of 300 professional healthcare providers were invited to participate in the proposed distance course. Of the participating professional healthcare providers, 72 (47%) successfully concluded the course (Group A), whereas 81 (53%) did not complete their course assignments and did not meet the minimum requirements for regular attendance (Group B). Knowledge acquisition was assessed with the Knowledge of Sickle Cell Disease Instrument, DFConhecimento, applied using the web tool eSurv. Univariate analysis by Poisson regression was employed to assess the influence of sociodemographic variables on the DFConhecimento score and to select variables to compose the initial multivariate regression model (p-value<0.20). The analysis was performed in the statistical programming environment R.

Results

The average score was 9.76 for Group A and 6.54 for Group B. The two groups were considered statistically different (p-value<0.05) for all items with the proportion of correct items being greater in Group A. Professional healthcare providers who concluded the course had a significantly higher DFConhecimento score (45%) when compared to those who did not successfully conclude the course.

Conclusion

Participation in a distance education course on sickle cell disease had a positive impact on the acquisition of knowledge about the disease by professional healthcare providers.

SUBMITTER: Diniz KKS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6738483 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jan - Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Knowledge of professional healthcare providers about sickle cell disease: Impact of a distance education course.

Diniz Katy Karoline Santos KKS Pagano Adriana Silvina AS Fernandes Ana Paula Pinheiro Chagas APPC Reis Ilka Afonso IA Pinheiro Júnior Leonardo Gonçalves LG Torres Heloísa de Carvalho HC

Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy 20180720 1

<h4>Objective</h4>To assess the impact of the distance education course "Sickle Cell Disease: Primary Health Care Line" on knowledge acquisition of professional healthcare providers.<h4>Methods</h4>A cross-sectional study was conducted with a quantitative approach at the Educational and Support Center for Hemoglobinopathies (Cehmob-MG), state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, in 2016. One hundred and fifty-three out of 300 professional healthcare providers were invited to participate in the proposed dist ...[more]

PMID: 31796163

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesMillions of children die every year from serious childhood illnesses. Most deaths are avertable with access to quality care. Saving Children's Lives (SCL) includes an abbreviated high-intensity training (SCL-aHIT) for providers who treat serious childhood illnesses. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of SCL-aHIT on knowledge acquisition and retention of providers.Setting76 participating centres who provide primary and secondary care in Kweneng District, Botswana.ParticipantsDoctors and nurses expected by the District Health Management Team to provide initial care to seriously ill children, completed SCL-aHIT between January 2014 and December 2016, submitted demographic data, course characteristics and at least one knowledge assessment.MethodsRetrospective, cohort study. Planned and actual primary outcome was adjusted acquisition (change in total knowledge score immediately after training) and retention (change in score at 1, 3 and 6 months), secondary outcomes were pneumonia and dehydration subscores. Descriptive statistics and linear mixed models with random intercept and slope were conducted. Relevant institutional review boards approved this study.Results211 providers had data for analysis. Cohort was 91% nurses, 61% clinic/health postbased and 45% pretrained in Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI). A strong effect of SCL-aHIT was seen with knowledge acquisition (+24.56±1.94, p<0.0001), and loss of retention was observed (-1.60±0.67/month, p=0.018). IMCI training demonstrated no significant effect on acquisition (+3.58±2.84, p=0.211 or retention (+0.20±0.91/month, p=0.824) of knowledge. On average, nurses scored lower than physicians (-19.39±3.30, p<0.0001). Lost to follow-up had a significant impact on knowledge retention (-3.03±0.88/month, p=0.0007).ConclusionsaHIT for care of the seriously ill child significantly increased provider knowledge and loss of knowledge occurred over time. IMCI training did not significantly impact overall knowledge acquisition nor retention, while professional status impacted overall score and lost to follow-up impacted retention.

Project description:Background. Gram negative antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide as both carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CREs) and Enterobacteriaceae producing extended spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) become more common. Objective. We analyzed clinicians' knowledge regarding resistant gram-negative organisms with respect to infection control practices, prescribing practices and assessment of their patients' risk for resistant infections. Design. Online survey. Participants. Target population included clinicians who prescribe antibiotics i.e., medical doctors and mid-level practitioners, at three Massachusetts hospitals. Methods. Questionnaires were sent to 3 Tufts-affiliated teaching hospitals to assess level of knowledge and elucidate perceptions about gram-negative resistance. Results. We received 434 responses from 3332 non-infectious disease clinicians (13%) surveyed at the three hospitals. 51.1% of clinicians correctly scored 50% or greater on the knowledge questions. Internal medicine clinicians had higher knowledge scores than non-internal medicine clinicians (62% vs 45%; OR = 1.67, p = 0.02). Clinicians within three years of training had higher scores than those with more than 10 years of training (64.3% vs 44%; OR = 2.3, p = 0.002). Clinicians with fewer years since training and those with higher knowledge scores were more likely to appropriately consider certain patients at risk for resistant infections (p < 0.05). 54.4% of clinicians were very concerned about gram-negative antibiotic resistance. 64.6% of clinicians felt comfortable de-escalating antibiotics as cultures are available. Conclusion. We found overall low knowledge scores and much variability in the way clinicians assess whether certain patient populations are at risk for antibiotic resistance. Internal medicine clinicians and those with fewer years since completion of their training scored higher and more appropriately considered patients at risk for resistance. The majority of clinicians are concerned about gram-negative resistance and indicated they would de-escalate antibiotic therapy if they had susceptibility information. These results will help focus and target our teaching and awareness-raising strategies.

Project description:BackgroundSevere combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is a group of life-threatening genetic disorders responsible for severe dysfunctions of the immune system. Despite the expansion of newborn screening in the U.S., there are gaps in healthcare providers' knowledge of SCID.MethodsWe recruited 277 U.S. healthcare providers for an online survey. The survey assessed providers' experience with SCID patients, knowledge about SCID, and needs and preferred formats for SCID-related informational resources. We examined differences between providers who have seen 2 or more patients with SCID (SCID provider group) and those who have seen 0-1 SCID patients (non-SCID provider group).ResultsOverall, 210 (75.8%) providers were included in the non-SCID provider group, and 121 (57.6%) of these providers were pediatricians. Compared to the SCID provider group, non-SCID provider group reported lower mean rating of SCID knowledge (x̄ = 4.8 vs. x̄ = 8.6, p < 0.0001) and higher informational needs. The largest informational needs identified by the non-SCID provider group were "understanding specific type of SCID" and "understanding what to expect across the lifespan." In the SCID provider group, the highest rated informational need was "family support referrals." Participants in the non-SCID provider group identified scientific publications and websites as preferred formats, with some variation between medical specialties.ConclusionBased on their experience with treating SCID patients, providers have varying levels of SCID knowledge and different informational needs. For providers who have encountered few SCID patients, informational needs start early, usually immediately after receiving a positive newborn screening result. These findings provide useful direction for the development and preferred outlets for receiving SCID-related information, with some variations between different types of providers. Results from this study will serve as a guide for creating relevant and accessible SCID resources for providers who can utilize them to improve care for SCID patients.

Dataset Information

Knowledge of professional healthcare providers about sickle cell disease: Impact of a distance education course.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Knowledge of professional healthcare providers about sickle cell disease: Impact of a distance education course.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets