Dataset Information

Exploring variation in parental worries about HPV vaccination: a latent-class analysis.

ABSTRACT: Background. Prior research has identified diverse worries that parents have about HPV vaccination. We sought to understand how parents prioritize worries and to identify subgroups of parents according to shared patterns of worry. Methods. We surveyed a national sample of 431 U.S. parents of adolescents who reported never having talked to their child's healthcare provider about HPV vaccination. Parents completed a best-worst scaling experiment designed to prioritize 11 common worries about HPV vaccination. The experiment used a balanced incomplete block design to present 11 choice tasks consisting of repeated subsets of worries. We used conditional logistic regression to prioritize worries and latent class models with 1-10 classes to identify subgroups of parents with shared worries. Results. Parents most often worried about long-term side effects of HPV vaccination, which about one-third (36%) ranked as their top worry. Other common top-ranked worries were how new the vaccine is (12%), motives of drug companies (12%), short-term side effects (10%), and that it may be unnecessary (10%). Latent class analyses suggested a relatively large number of distinct worry profiles, with most classes characterized by a worry about long-term side effects in combination with one other worry. Discussion. Our findings suggest that providers should be prepared to address concerns about long-term side effects, as this worry was prioritized across many subgroups of parents. However, to best address worry, a tailored, rather than targeted, communication approach may be needed.

SUBMITTER: Gilkey MB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6746473 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Exploring variation in parental worries about HPV vaccination: a latent-class analysis.

Gilkey Melissa B MB Mohan Divya D Janssen Ellen M EM McRee Annie-Laurie AL Kornides Melanie L ML Bridges John F P JFP

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics 20190507 7-8

<b>Background</b>. Prior research has identified diverse worries that parents have about HPV vaccination. We sought to understand how parents prioritize worries and to identify subgroups of parents according to shared patterns of worry. <b>Methods</b>. We surveyed a national sample of 431 U.S. parents of adolescents who reported never having talked to their child's healthcare provider about HPV vaccination. Parents completed a best-worst scaling experiment designed to prioritize 11 common worrie ...[more]

PMID: 30951396

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Parental reports are commonly used for adolescent HPV vaccination status but may be subjected to bias. Guided by the Socioecological Framework, our study explores potential multilevel factors influencing the inaccuracy of parental reports of adolescent HPV vaccination status. METHODS:Data from parents of 19,683 adolescents with provider-verified data were analyzed using multilevel modeling. Correlates included adolescent characteristics, parent/household factors, number of providers seen, state-level median income, and state-level HPV vaccine policy. Outcomes included inaccuracy in reporting: vaccine initiation (?1 dose), completion (3 doses), and number of doses. RESULTS:24% and 25% of parents reported initiation and completion inaccurately; 28% under-reported and 11% over-reported number of doses. All adolescent characteristics, parent/household factors, and number of healthcare providers seen were associated with the outcomes. Of note, compared to parents of White adolescents, parents of racial/ethnic minority adolescents were more likely to inaccurately report all outcomes (aOR ranges from 1.43 to 1.76 for initiation, 1.45-1.75 for completion, 1.98-2.05 for under-reporting, and 1.17-1.41 for over-reporting). Households with higher maternal education (aOR?=?0.70, 0.92, 0.79, and 0.80) and income (aOR?=?0.54, 0.62, 0.50, and 0.70) were less likely to inaccurately report initiation, report completion, under-report, and over-report, respectively. Those having seen more providers were less likely to inaccurately report initiation and completion but more likely to over-report number of vaccine doses. DISCUSSION:Being parents of females, older adolescents, and racial/ethnic minority adolescents, having lower material education, and poverty status were associated with higher odds of inaccurately reporting HPV vaccination status. These results have implications for estimates drawn from self-reports. Future research can examine sources of inaccuracies (e.g., social desirability or health literacy); they could also explore solutions (e.g., access to vaccine records) that can help parents accurately report vaccination status. State policy does not appear to have an impact on report accuracy.

Project description:BackgroundSeveral pharmaceutical treatments for chronic pain caused by osteoarthritis (OA) and chronic low back pain (CLBP) are available or currently under development, each associated with different adverse events (AEs) and efficacy profiles. It is therefore important to understand what trade-offs patients are willing to make when choosing between treatments.MethodsA discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was conducted with 437 adults with chronic pain caused by OA and/or CLBP. Respondents were presented with a series of scenarios and asked to choose between pairs of hypothetical treatments, each defined by six attributes: level of symptom control; risks of heart attack, rapidly progressive osteoarthritis and dependency; frequency and mode of administration and cost. Attributes were based on known profiles of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids and injected nerve growth factor inhibitors, the last of which were under clinical development at the time of the study. Data were analysed using a latent class (LC) model to explore preference heterogeneity.ResultsOverall, respondents considered improving symptom control and reducing risk of physical dependency to be the most important attributes. The LC analysis identified four participant classes: an 'efficacy-focused' class (33.7%), a 'cost-averse' class (29.4%), a 'physical-dependence-averse' class (19.6%) and a 'needle-averse' class (17.3%). Subgroup membership was incompletely predicted by participant age and their responses to comprehension questions.ConclusionsPreference heterogeneity across respondents indicates a need for a personalized approach to offering treatment options. Symptom improvement, cost, physical dependence and route of administration might be important to different patients.SignificanceMultiple treatment options that differ substantially in terms of efficacy and adverse events are available for the management of chronic pain. With a growing emphasis on a patient-centred care model that incorporates patients' priorities and values into treatment decisions, there is a need to understand how individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain balance the benefits and risks of treatment and how treatment priorities vary among individuals. This study was designed to identify patient preferences for different characteristics of treatments for the management of chronic pain and to investigate how preferences differ among respondents.

Dataset Information

Exploring variation in parental worries about HPV vaccination: a latent-class analysis.

Publications

Exploring variation in parental worries about HPV vaccination: a latent-class analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets