Mendelian randomization analysis rules out disylipidaemia as colorectal cancer cause.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Ibanez-Sanz G
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6746794 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThe relationship between serum lipids and cholecystitis is still under investigation. To examine the causal effect of serum lipids on cholecystitis using the Mendelian randomization method.MethodsWe conducted univariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using summary statistics from two independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on serum lipids (n = 132,908) and cholecystitis (n = 361,194). Mainly, the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was utilized to combine each SNP's causal estimation, and the MR-Egger was adopted as a complementary method, together with the weighted median. Cochrane's Q value was employed to appraise heterogeneity. The MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO were used to detect the horizontal pleiotropy.ResultsOur univariable results displayed a minor protective effect of serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (OR [95% CI] = 0.9984483 [0.9984499, 0.9984468]; p = 0.008) on cholecystitis. No significant causal effect of total cholesterol (TC) (OR [95% CI] = 0.9994228 [0.9994222, 0.9994233]; p = 0.296), triglycerides (OR [95% CI] = 0.9990893 [0.9990882, 0.9990903]; p = 0.238) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (OR [95% CI] = 0.9997020 [0.9997017, 0.9997023]; p = 0.565) was found on cholecystitis.ConclusionThese findings suggest that LDL cholesterolhas a slight protective effect on cholecystitis, which can be easily affected by confounding factors. TC, triglycerides and HDL cholesterol don't have causal effect on cholecystitis. The protective effect of serum lipids on cholecystitis, though possible, remain less certain.
| S-EPMC8447629 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundChronic inflammation is a risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC). Circulating C-reactive protein (CRP) is also moderately associated with CRC risk. However, observational studies are susceptible to unmeasured confounding or reverse causality. Using genetic risk variants as instrumental variables, we investigated the causal relationship between genetically elevated CRP concentration and CRC risk, using a Mendelian randomization approach.MethodsIndividual-level data from 30 480 CRC cases and 22 844 controls from 33 participating studies in three international consortia were used: the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO), the Colorectal Transdisciplinary Study (CORECT) and the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR). As instrumental variables, we included 19 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously associated with CRP concentration. The SNP-CRC associations were estimated using a logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, principal components and genotyping phases. An inverse-variance weighted method was applied to estimate the causal effect of CRP on CRC risk.ResultsAmong the 19 CRP-associated SNPs, rs1260326 and rs6734238 were significantly associated with CRC risk (P = 7.5 × 10-4, and P = 0.003, respectively). A genetically predicted one-unit increase in the log-transformed CRP concentrations (mg/l) was not associated with increased risk of CRC [odds ratio (OR) = 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97, 1.12; P = 0.256). No evidence of association was observed in subgroup analyses stratified by other risk factors.ConclusionsIn spite of adequate statistical power to detect moderate association, we found genetically elevated CRP concentration was not associated with increased risk of CRC among individuals of European ancestry. Our findings suggested that circulating CRP is unlikely to be a causal factor in CRC development.
| S-EPMC6659358 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHigher adiposity increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), but whether this relationship varies by anatomical sub-site or by sex is unclear. Further, the metabolic alterations mediating the effects of adiposity on CRC are not fully understood.MethodsWe examined sex- and site-specific associations of adiposity with CRC risk and whether adiposity-associated metabolites explain the associations of adiposity with CRC. Genetic variants from genome-wide association studies of body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR, unadjusted for BMI; N = 806,810), and 123 metabolites from targeted nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics (N = 24,925), were used as instruments. Sex-combined and sex-specific Mendelian randomization (MR) was conducted for BMI and WHR with CRC risk (58,221 cases and 67,694 controls in the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium, Colorectal Cancer Transdisciplinary Study, and Colon Cancer Family Registry). Sex-combined MR was conducted for BMI and WHR with metabolites, for metabolites with CRC, and for BMI and WHR with CRC adjusted for metabolite classes in multivariable models.ResultsIn sex-specific MR analyses, higher BMI (per 4.2 kg/m2) was associated with 1.23 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08, 1.38) times higher CRC odds among men (inverse-variance-weighted (IVW) model); among women, higher BMI (per 5.2 kg/m2) was associated with 1.09 (95% CI = 0.97, 1.22) times higher CRC odds. WHR (per 0.07 higher) was more strongly associated with CRC risk among women (IVW OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.08, 1.43) than men (IVW OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.81, 1.36). BMI or WHR was associated with 104/123 metabolites at false discovery rate-corrected P ≤ 0.05; several metabolites were associated with CRC, but not in directions that were consistent with the mediation of positive adiposity-CRC relations. In multivariable MR analyses, associations of BMI and WHR with CRC were not attenuated following adjustment for representative metabolite classes, e.g., the univariable IVW OR for BMI with CRC was 1.12 (95% CI = 1.00, 1.26), and this became 1.11 (95% CI = 0.99, 1.26) when adjusting for cholesterol in low-density lipoprotein particles.ConclusionsOur results suggest that higher BMI more greatly raises CRC risk among men, whereas higher WHR more greatly raises CRC risk among women. Adiposity was associated with numerous metabolic alterations, but none of these explained associations between adiposity and CRC. More detailed metabolomic measures are likely needed to clarify the mechanistic pathways.
| S-EPMC7745469 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWith the development and popularization of low-dose chest CT technology, the diagnosis and survival rates of patients with early lung cancer (LC) have significantly improved. The occurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) as the second primary cancer (SPC) in primary lung cancer (PLC) survivors has become an essential factor affecting the prognosis of early LC. This study explored the potential association between PLC and CRC genetically, laying a foundation for developing SPC-CRC prevention strategies after primary early LC.MethodsBased on a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) design, this study systematically screened genetic instrumental variables (IVs) based on the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of PLC and CRC, applied inverse variance weighted (IVW) as the main method to assess the incidence association between the two cancers, and used a variety of other MR methods for supplementary analysis. Finally, the Genetic Risk Scores (GRS) method was used for secondary analysis to verify the results robustness further.ResultsFrom LC to CRC forward MR analysis, 20 genetic IVs of overall LC, 15 genetic IVs of squamous cell lung carcinoma (LUSC), and 10 genetic IVs of adenocarcinoma of the lung (LUAD) were screened. In the reverse MR analysis from CRC to LC, 47 genetic IVs for overall CRC, 37 for colon cancer, and 25 for rectal cancer were screened. The IVW method and a variety of MR methods all found that overall LC and CRC were significantly associated at the genetic level. Subgroup analysis also showed that LUSC was associated with CRC. And the results of the GRS method were consistent with those of the main analysis, confirming the robustness of the study. Our MR study found an association between LC and CRC, with an increased risk of SPC-CRC following PLC, especially LUSC. Our study provides an essential basis for the precise prevention of SPC-CRC after PLC, suggesting that we should pay more attention to the population with a history of PLC in clinical work, and pay close attention to the incidence of SPC-CRC, and carry out intervention and treatment as soon as possible.
| S-EPMC10577972 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeWith the advancement in early diagnosis and treatment, the prognosis for individuals diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) has improved significantly. The prognosis of primary breast cancer (PBC) survivors can be significantly influenced by the occurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) as a secondary primary cancer (SPC). The objective of this study is to explore the possible genetic association between PBC and CRC, aiming to lay a groundwork for the development of preventive strategies against SPC-CRC following BC surgery.MethodsWe employed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to thoroughly examine genetic instrumental variables (IVs) derived from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted on PBC and CRC. And applied inverse variance weighted (IVW) and multiple other MR methods (weighted median, simple median, MR-PRESSO and MR-RAPS) to evaluate the association between the two cancers (PBC and CRC) at genetic level. Furthermore, the robustness of the findings was further confirmed through the utilization of the genetic risk score (GRS) method in a secondary analysis.ResultsForward MR analysis, a total of 179 BC genetic IVs, 25 estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) genetic IVs and 135 ER-positive (ER+) genetic IVs were screened. Reverse MR analysis, 179 genetic IVs of CRC, 25 genetic IVs of colon cancer, 135 genetic IVs of rectal cancer, 25 genetic IVs of left colon cancer and 135 genetic IVs of right colon cancer were screened. IVW and other MR methods found no significant genetic association between PBC and CRC (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis also showed that ER- BC and ER+ BC were not correlated with the occurrence of CRC (P > 0.05). The findings of the secondary analysis using GRS were consistent with those obtained from the primary analysis, thereby confirming the robustness and reliability of this study.ConclusionsOur findings do not provide any evidence supporting the association between PBC and CRC at the genetic level. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to replicate our findings.
| S-EPMC10811019 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundFor men and women, taller height is associated with increased risk of all cancers combined. For colorectal cancer (CRC), it is unclear whether the differential association of height by sex is real or is due to confounding or bias inherent in observational studies. We performed a Mendelian randomization study to examine the association between height and CRC risk.MethodsTo minimize confounding and bias, we derived a weighted genetic risk score predicting height (using 696 genetic variants associated with height) in 10,226 CRC cases and 10,286 controls. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for associations between height, genetically predicted height and CRC.ResultsUsing conventional methods, increased height (per 10-cm increment) was associated with increased CRC risk (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.02-1.15). In sex-specific analyses, height was associated with CRC risk for women (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.05-1.26), but not men (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.92-1.05). Consistent with these results, carrying greater numbers of (weighted) height-increasing alleles (per 1-unit increase) was associated with higher CRC risk for women and men combined (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01-1.14) and for women (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = .01-1.19). There was weaker evidence of an association for men (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.96-1.15).ConclusionWe provide evidence for a causal association between height and CRC for women. The CRC-height association for men remains unclear and warrants further investigation in other large studies.
| S-EPMC4481609 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Previous observational studies have provided inconsistent evidence for the association between alcohol consumption and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). To assess this potential causal effect, we performed bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: We selected six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables (IVs) associated with alcohol consumption (ever versus never drinker) and two SNPs representing the number of drinks per week from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the Japanese population. Summary data for CRC were obtained from a GWAS meta-analysis in the Japanese population of 6,692 CRC cases and 27,178 controls. MR analysis was performed by the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method primarily, supplemented with several sensitivity methods including the weighted median method, maximum likelihood method, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) test, MR-Egger regression, Causal Analysis Using Summary Effect estimates (CAUSE) method, as well as constrained maximum likelihood and model averaging and Bayesian information criterion (cML-MA-BIC) method. Multivariable Mendelian randomization (MMR) analyses were used to adjust for potential confounders. Reverse MR analyses were also performed to assess the potential causal effect of CRC on alcohol consumption. Results: Genetically predicted alcohol consumption (ever versus never drinker) was positively associated with the risk of CRC (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-1.12, p = 1.51 × 10-5 by IVW). The number of alcoholic drinks per week was also associated with an increased risk of CRC (OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.27-1.52, p = 5.29 × 10-13 by IVW). Sensitivity analysis yielded similar results. Reverse MR analyses found no evidence that CRC contributes to either ever drinkers (OR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.99-1.00, p = 0.339 by IVW) or added number of drinks per week (OR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.98-1.05, p = 0.545 by IVW). Conclusion: Our study suggested a potential causal association between alcohol consumption and the risk of CRC among Asians. Reducing drinking may be beneficial to the prevention and management of CRC.
| S-EPMC9540194 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10982360 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:High body mass index (BMI) is consistently linked to increased risk of colorectal cancer for men, whereas the association is less clear for women. As risk estimates from observational studies may be biased and/or confounded, we conducted a Mendelian randomization study to estimate the causal association between BMI and colorectal cancer. METHODS:We used data from 10,226 colorectal cancer cases and 10,286 controls of European ancestry. The Mendelian randomization analysis used a weighted genetic risk score, derived from 77 genome-wide association study-identified variants associated with higher BMI, as an instrumental variable (IV). We compared the IV odds ratio (IV-OR) with the OR obtained using a conventional covariate-adjusted analysis. RESULTS:Individuals carrying greater numbers of BMI-increasing alleles had higher colorectal cancer risk [per weighted allele OR, 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-1.57]. Our IV estimation results support the hypothesis that genetically influenced BMI is directly associated with risk for colorectal cancer (IV-OR per 5 kg/m(2), 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13-2.01). In the sex-specific IV analyses higher BMI was associated with higher risk of colorectal cancer among women (IV-OR per 5 kg/m(2), 1.82; 95% CI, 1.26-2.61). For men, genetically influenced BMI was not associated with colorectal cancer (IV-OR per 5 kg/m(2), 1.18; 95% CI, 0.73-1.92). CONCLUSIONS:High BMI was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk for women. Whether abdominal obesity, rather than overall obesity, is a more important risk factor for men requires further investigation. IMPACT:Overall, conventional epidemiologic and Mendelian randomization studies suggest a strong association between obesity and the risk of colorectal cancer.
| S-EPMC4490960 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Results from epidemiologic studies examining polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and colorectal cancer risk are inconsistent. Mendelian randomization may strengthen causal inference from observational studies. Given their shared metabolic pathway, examining the combined effects of aspirin/NSAID use with PUFAs could help elucidate an association between PUFAs and colorectal cancer risk.Methods: Information was leveraged from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) regarding PUFA-associated SNPs to create weighted genetic scores (wGS) representing genetically predicted circulating blood PUFAs for 11,016 non-Hispanic white colorectal cancer cases and 13,732 controls in the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO). Associations per SD increase in the wGS were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. Interactions between PUFA wGSs and aspirin/NSAID use on colorectal cancer risk were also examined.Results: Modest colorectal cancer risk reductions were observed per SD increase in circulating linoleic acid [ORLA = 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.93-0.98; P = 5.2 × 10-4] and ?-linolenic acid (ORALA = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.92-0.97; P = 5.4 × 10-5), whereas modest increased risks were observed for arachidonic (ORAA = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.03-1.08; P = 3.3 × 10-5), eicosapentaenoic (OREPA = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.01-1.07; P = 2.5 × 10-3), and docosapentaenoic acids (ORDPA = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01-1.06; P = 1.2 × 10-2). Each of these effects was stronger among aspirin/NSAID nonusers in the stratified analyses.Conclusions: Our study suggests that higher circulating shorter-chain PUFAs (i.e., LA and ALA) were associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk, whereas longer-chain PUFAs (i.e., AA, EPA, and DPA) were associated with an increased colorectal cancer risk.Impact: The interaction of PUFAs with aspirin/NSAID use indicates a shared colorectal cancer inflammatory pathway. Future research should continue to improve PUFA genetic instruments to elucidate the independent effects of PUFAs on colorectal cancer.
| S-EPMC7125012 | biostudies-literature