Dataset Information

Evaluation of the first U.S. staple foods ordinance: impact on nutritional quality of food store offerings, customer purchases and home food environments.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Many lower-income and racially diverse communities in the U.S. have limited access to healthy foods, with few supermarkets and many small convenience stores, which tend to stock limited quantities and varieties of healthy foods. To address food access, in 2015 the Minneapolis Staple Foods Ordinance became the first policy requiring food stores to stock minimum quantities and varieties of 10 categories of healthy foods/beverages, including fruits, vegetables, whole grains and other staples, through licensing. This study examined whether: (a) stores complied, (b) overall healthfulness of store environments improved, (c) healthy customer purchases increased, and (d) healthfulness of home food environments improved among frequent small store shoppers. METHODS:Data for this natural (or quasi) experiment were collected at four times: pre-policy (2014), implementation only (no enforcement, 2015), enforcement initiation (2016) and continued monitoring (2017). In-person store assessments were conducted to evaluate food availability, price, quality, marketing and placement in randomly sampled food retailers in Minneapolis (n?=?84) and compared to those in a nearby control city, St. Paul, Minnesota (n?=?71). Stores were excluded that were: supermarkets, authorized through WIC (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children), and specialty stores (e.g., spice shops). Customer intercept interviews were conducted with 3,039 customers exiting stores. Home visits, including administration of home food inventories, were conducted with a sub-sample of frequent shoppers (n?=?88). RESULTS:Overall, findings indicated significant improvements in healthy food offerings by retailers over time in both Minneapolis and St. Paul, with no significant differences in change between the two cities. Compliance was low; in 2017 only 10% of Minneapolis retailers in the sample were fully compliant, and 51% of participating Minneapolis retailers met at least 8 of the 10 required standards. Few changes were observed in the healthfulness of customer purchases or the healthfulness of home food environments among frequent shoppers, and changes were not different between cities. CONCLUSIONS:This study is the first evaluation a local staple foods ordinance in the U.S. and reflects the challenges and time required for implementing such policies. TRIAL REGISTRATION:NCT02774330 .

SUBMITTER: Laska MN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6751624 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of the first U.S. staple foods ordinance: impact on nutritional quality of food store offerings, customer purchases and home food environments.

Laska Melissa N MN Caspi Caitlin E CE Lenk Kathleen K Moe Stacey G SG Pelletier Jennifer E JE Harnack Lisa J LJ Erickson Darin J DJ

The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity 20190918 1

<h4>Background</h4>Many lower-income and racially diverse communities in the U.S. have limited access to healthy foods, with few supermarkets and many small convenience stores, which tend to stock limited quantities and varieties of healthy foods. To address food access, in 2015 the Minneapolis Staple Foods Ordinance became the first policy requiring food stores to stock minimum quantities and varieties of 10 categories of healthy foods/beverages, including fruits, vegetables, whole grains and o ...[more]

PMID: 31533737

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPurchases at small/non-traditional food stores tend to have poor nutritional quality, and have been associated with poor health outcomes, including increased obesity risk The purpose of this study was to examine whether customers who shop at small/non-traditional food stores with more health promoting features make healthier purchases.MethodsIn a cross-sectional design, data collectors assessed store features in a sample of 99 small and non-traditional food stores not participating in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) in Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN in 2014. Customer intercept interviews (n = 594) collected purchase data from a bag check and demographics from a survey. Store measures included fruit/vegetable and whole grain availability, an overall Healthy Food Supply Score (HFSS), healthy food advertisements and in-store placement, and shelf space of key items. Customer nutritional measures were analyzed using Nutrient Databases System for Research (NDSR), and included the purchase of ≥1 serving of fruits/vegetables; ≥1 serving of whole grains; and overall Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) score for foods/beverages purchased. Associations between store and customer measures were estimated in multilevel linear and logistic regression models, controlling for customer characteristics and store type.ResultsFew customers purchased fruits and vegetables (8%) or whole grains (8%). In fully adjusted models, purchase HEI-2010 scores were associated with fruit/vegetable shelf space (p = 0.002) and the ratio of shelf space devoted to healthy vs. less healthy items (p = 0.0002). Offering ≥14 varieties of fruit/vegetables was associated with produce purchases (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.2-12.3), as was having produce visible from the store entrance (OR 2.3 95% CI 1.0 to 5.8), but whole grain availability measures were not associated with whole grain purchases.ConclusionsStrategies addressing both customer demand and the availability of healthy food may be necessary to improve customer purchases.Trial registrationClinialTrials.gov: NCT02774330 . Registered May 4, 2016 (retrospectively registered).

Project description:BackgroundObesity and diet-related noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) account for the largest proportion of disease burden worldwide, and an unhealthy food environment is a key driver. Food retailers play an important role in food environments through the availability and purchases of healthy food products at various stores.ObjectivesTo assess whether the healthiness of food and non-alcoholic drink product purchases vary according to retail store type.MethodsWe undertook a cross-sectional analysis of Nielsen New Zealand Homescan® panel data, which is a nationally representative sample of 2500 households in terms of certain key household demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Panel members were asked to record all food and beverage products that were purchased and brought back to the home between October 2018 and October 2019. Household food and non-alcoholic drink purchases were linked with two food composition databases (Nutritrack, a New Zealand packaged food composition database, and the FOODfiles New Zealand Food Composition Database) to extract data on the nutrient profile of products purchased. We developed a store classification tool, and classified stores as supermarkets, grocery stores, convenience stores, fruit and vegetable stores, meat and fish stores, or bakeries. We estimated the Health Star Rating (HSR) for all products and defined a product with HSR ≥ 3.5 as 'healthy'. We computed estimated mean HSR and conducted multivariate regression analyses.ResultsIn total, 3,940,458 product purchases were included in the analyses, consisting of 20,491 unique products purchased at different stores over the one-year period by 1800 panellist households. Supermarket products made up the majority of household food and drink purchases (3,545,141 of 3,940,458; 90%). Overall, the estimated mean HSR was 3.5 stars. In comparison to the reference group of supermarkets, the odds ratio for healthy products purchased at fruit and vegetable stores was 4.62, at grocery stores it was 2.36, and at meat and fish stores it was 1.99. In contrast, the odds ratios from convenience stores and bakeries were 0.58 and 0.03. Except for convenience stores, these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05).DiscussionWe found significant differences in household purchases of healthy food and beverages according to food retail store type, with healthier food much more likely to be purchased from fruit and vegetable stores, meat and fish stores and grocery stores, and much less likely to be purchased from bakeries and convenience stores as compared with supermarkets.ConclusionPolicies to improve healthy food retailing should consider all retail store types and focus particularly on increasing the availability of healthy food options at convenience stores and bakeries. Given that supermarkets are the source of most household food purchases (both healthy and unhealthy), strategies are also warranted to increase the relative availability and purchases of healthy foods from supermarkets.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of the first U.S. staple foods ordinance: impact on nutritional quality of food store offerings, customer purchases and home food environments.

Publications

Evaluation of the first U.S. staple foods ordinance: impact on nutritional quality of food store offerings, customer purchases and home food environments.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets