Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Copy-number variants in clinical genome sequencing: deployment and interpretation for rare and undiagnosed disease.


ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:Current diagnostic testing for genetic disorders involves serial use of specialized assays spanning multiple technologies. In principle, genome sequencing (GS) can detect all genomic pathogenic variant types on a single platform. Here we evaluate copy-number variant (CNV) calling as part of a clinically accredited GS test. METHODS:We performed analytical validation of CNV calling on 17 reference samples, compared the sensitivity of GS-based variants with those from a clinical microarray, and set a bound on precision using orthogonal technologies. We developed a protocol for family-based analysis of GS-based CNV calls, and deployed this across a clinical cohort of 79 rare and undiagnosed cases. RESULTS:We found that CNV calls from GS are at least as sensitive as those from microarrays, while only creating a modest increase in the number of variants interpreted (~10 CNVs per case). We identified clinically significant CNVs in 15% of the first 79 cases analyzed, all of which were confirmed by an orthogonal approach. The pipeline also enabled discovery of a uniparental disomy (UPD) and a 50% mosaic trisomy 14. Directed analysis of select CNVs enabled breakpoint level resolution of genomic rearrangements and phasing of de novo CNVs. CONCLUSION:Robust identification of CNVs by GS is possible within a clinical testing environment.

SUBMITTER: Gross AM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6752263 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications


<h4>Purpose</h4>Current diagnostic testing for genetic disorders involves serial use of specialized assays spanning multiple technologies. In principle, genome sequencing (GS) can detect all genomic pathogenic variant types on a single platform. Here we evaluate copy-number variant (CNV) calling as part of a clinically accredited GS test.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed analytical validation of CNV calling on 17 reference samples, compared the sensitivity of GS-based variants with those from a clini  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4081054 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4694911 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7689032 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6267442 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4118997 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6205289 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5803418 | biostudies-literature