Dataset Information

A data-driven evaluation of the size and content of expanded carrier screening panels.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) proposed seven criteria for expanded carrier screening (ECS) panel design. To ensure that screening for a condition is sufficiently sensitive to identify carriers and reduce residual risk of noncarriers, one criterion requires a per-condition carrier rate greater than 1 in 100. However, it is unestablished whether this threshold corresponds with a loss in clinical detection. The impact of the proposed panel design criteria on at-risk couple detection warrants data-driven evaluation.

Methods

Carrier rates and at-risk couple rates were calculated in 56,281 patients who underwent a 176-condition ECS and were evaluated for panels satisfying various criteria. Condition-specific clinical detection rates were estimated via simulation.

Results

Different interpretations of the 1-in-100 criterion have variable impact: a compliant panel would include between 3 and 38 conditions, identify 11-81% fewer at-risk couples, and detect 36-79% fewer carriers than a 176-condition panel. If the carrier rate threshold must be exceeded in all ethnicities, ECS panels would lack prevalent conditions like cystic fibrosis. Simulations suggest that the clinical detection rate remains >84% for conditions with carrier rates as low as 1 in 1000.

Conclusion

The 1-in-100 criterion limits at-risk couple detection and should be reconsidered.

SUBMITTER: Ben-Shachar R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6752311 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A data-driven evaluation of the size and content of expanded carrier screening panels.

Ben-Shachar Rotem R Svenson Ashley A Goldberg James D JD Muzzey Dale D

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 20190228 9

<h4>Purpose</h4>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) proposed seven criteria for expanded carrier screening (ECS) panel design. To ensure that screening for a condition is sufficiently sensitive to identify carriers and reduce residual risk of noncarriers, one criterion requires a per-condition carrier rate greater than 1 in 100. However, it is unestablished whether this threshold corresponds with a loss in clinical detection. The impact of the proposed panel design cri ...[more]

PMID: 30816298

Similar Datasets

Project description:Study questionWhat are the sperm and egg donor rejection rates after expanded carrier screening (ECS)?Summary answerUsing an ECS panel looking at 46/47 genes, 17.6% of donors were rejected.What is known alreadyThe use of ECS is becoming commonplace in assisted reproductive technology, including testing of egg and sperm donors. Most national guidelines recommend rejection of donors if they are carriers of a genetic disease. If the use of ECS increases, there will be a decline in the number of donors available.Study design, size, durationA review of the current preconception ECS panels available to donors was carried out through an online search. The genetic testing results of donors from Cryos International were analysed to determine how many were rejected on the basis of the ECS.Participants/materials, setting, methodsData on gamete donors and their carrier status was provided by Cryos International, who screen donors using their own bespoke ECS panel. The ECS panels identified through the review were compared to the Cryos International panel and data.Main results and the role of chanceA total of 16 companies and 42 associated ECS panels were reviewed. There were a total of 2673 unique disorders covered by the panels examined, with a mean of 329 disorders screened. None of these disorders were common to all panels. Cryos International screen 46 disorders in males and 47 in females. From 883 candidate donors, 17.6% (155/883) were rejected based on their ECS result. Carriers of alpha-thalassaemia represented the largest proportion of those rejected (19.4%, 30/155), then spinal muscular atrophy (15.5%, 24/155) and cystic fibrosis (14.8%, 23/155).Limitations, reasons for cautionPanel information was found on company websites and may not have been accurate.Wider implications of the findingsThis study highlights the need for consistent EU regulations and guidelines that allow genetic matching of gamete donors to their recipients, preventing the need to reject donors who are known carriers. A larger ECS panel would be most beneficial; however, this would not be viable without matching of donors and recipients.Study funding/competing interest(s)No specific funding was obtained. J.C.H. is the founder of Global Women Connected, a platform to discuss women's health issues and the Embryology and PGD Academy, who deliver education in clinical embryology. She has been paid to give a lecture by Cryos in 2019. A-B.S. is an employee of Cryos International.Trial registration numberN/A.

Dataset Information

A data-driven evaluation of the size and content of expanded carrier screening panels.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

A data-driven evaluation of the size and content of expanded carrier screening panels.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets