Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparison of short messaging service self-reported adherence with other adherence measures in a demonstration project of HIV preexposure prophylaxis in Kenya and Uganda.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:Short messaging service (SMS) can collect adherence data on a frequent basis and is relatively anonymous, and therefore could potentially reduce recall and social desirability biases prevalent in other self-reported measures. METHODS:We compared SMS self-reported adherence with three self-reported adherence questions (rating of ability to adhere, frequency of doses taken, percentage of doses taken) and two objective adherence measures [electronic adherence monitoring (EAM) and plasma tenofovir levels] using data from HIV-uninfected members of serodiscordant couples enrolled in a preexposure prophylaxis demonstration project in Kenya and Uganda. RESULTS:Of 373 enrolled participants, 256 (69%) were male and median age at enrolment was 29 years (26, 35). Fifty-two percent were from Kenya and median education at enrolment was 10 years (7,12). Overall, median adherence was 90, 75, 85, 94 and 79%, respectively, for self-report by SMS, rating, frequency, percentage and EAM adherence. Spearman's correlation coefficient between SMS and interviewer-administered self-reported measures was 0.18 for rating and frequency, 0.22 for percentage and 0.14 for EAM (all P?

SUBMITTER: Musinguzi N 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6755137 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparison of short messaging service self-reported adherence with other adherence measures in a demonstration project of HIV preexposure prophylaxis in Kenya and Uganda.

Musinguzi Nicholas N   Muwonge Timothy T   Ngure Kenneth K   Katabira Elly E   Mugo Nelly N   Burns Bridget Frances O'Rourke BFO   Baeten Jared M JM   Heffron Renee R   Haberer Jessica E JE  

AIDS (London, England) 20180901 15


<h4>Objective</h4>Short messaging service (SMS) can collect adherence data on a frequent basis and is relatively anonymous, and therefore could potentially reduce recall and social desirability biases prevalent in other self-reported measures.<h4>Methods</h4>We compared SMS self-reported adherence with three self-reported adherence questions (rating of ability to adhere, frequency of doses taken, percentage of doses taken) and two objective adherence measures [electronic adherence monitoring (EA  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4191829 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6375797 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7213512 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5762266 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7856306 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5865612 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4334721 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9833205 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3749697 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5381825 | biostudies-other