Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A Comparative Linear Interaction Energy and MM/PBSA Study on SIRT1-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculation.


ABSTRACT: Binding free energy (?Gbind) computation can play an important role in prioritizing compounds to be evaluated experimentally on their affinity for target proteins, yet fast and accurate ?Gbind calculation remains an elusive task. In this study, we compare the performance of two popular end-point methods, i.e., linear interaction energy (LIE) and molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA), with respect to their ability to correlate calculated binding affinities of 27 thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine-6-carboxamide-derived sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) inhibitors with experimental data. Compared with the standard single-trajectory setup of MM/PBSA, our study elucidates that LIE allows to obtain direct ("absolute") values for SIRT1 binding free energies with lower compute requirements, while the accuracy in calculating relative values for ?Gbind is comparable (Pearson's r = 0.72 and 0.64 for LIE and MM/PBSA, respectively). We also investigate the potential of combining multiple docking poses in iterative LIE models and find that Boltzmann-like weighting of outcomes of simulations starting from different poses can retrieve appropriate binding orientations. In addition, we find that in this particular case study the LIE and MM/PBSA models can be optimized by neglecting the contributions from electrostatic and polar interactions to the ?Gbind calculations.

SUBMITTER: Rifai EA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6759767 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A Comparative Linear Interaction Energy and MM/PBSA Study on SIRT1-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculation.

Rifai Eko Aditya EA   van Dijk Marc M   Vermeulen Nico P E NPE   Yanuar Arry A   Geerke Daan P DP  

Journal of chemical information and modeling 20190911 9


Binding free energy (Δ<i>G</i><sub><i>bind</i></sub>) computation can play an important role in prioritizing compounds to be evaluated experimentally on their affinity for target proteins, yet fast and accurate Δ<i>G</i><sub><i>bind</i></sub> calculation remains an elusive task. In this study, we compare the performance of two popular end-point methods, i.e., linear interaction energy (LIE) and molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA), with respect to their ability to correla  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC1303837 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3180098 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2819397 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4492929 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3006460 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2253447 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4227162 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6048991 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6745021 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1100764 | biostudies-literature