Dataset Information

Survival disparities for second primary malignancies diagnosed among childhood cancer survivors: A population-based assessment.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Curative therapy places childhood cancer survivors at increased risk for second primary malignancies (SPMs). However, there have been few population-based attempts to characterize differences between outcomes of SPMs in childhood cancer survivors and outcomes of first primary malignancies (FPMs).

Methods

Clinical and demographic information about childhood cancer survivors who developed SPMs and individuals with comparable FPMs was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with Cox proportional hazards models comparing the overall survival (OS) of individuals with and without a history of childhood cancer. OS was evaluated both overall and for specific cancers diagnosed in 50 or more childhood cancer survivors. Models accounted for potential confounders, including sex, race, age, treatment decade, histology, and disease stage.

Results

Compared with individuals with FPMs (n = 1,332,203), childhood cancer survivors (n = 1409) with an SPM experienced poorer OS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.72-2.02) after the study had accounted for cancer type, age, sex, race, and decade of diagnosis. A history of childhood cancer remained a poor prognostic factor for all specific cancers evaluated, including breast cancer (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.63-2.62), thyroid cancer (HR, 3.59; 95% CI, 2.08-6.19), acute myeloid leukemia (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.87-3.05), brain cancer (HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.72-2.55), melanoma (HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.55-4.27), bone cancer (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.37-2.57), and soft-tissue sarcoma (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.78-3.33).

Conclusions

Compared with individuals without a prior cancer diagnosis, survivors of childhood cancer with an SPM experienced inferior outcomes. Survival disparities were observed for the most frequent SPMs diagnosed in childhood cancer survivors.

SUBMITTER: Brown AL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6763352 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Survival disparities for second primary malignancies diagnosed among childhood cancer survivors: A population-based assessment.

Brown Austin L AL Arroyo Vidal M VM Agrusa Jennifer E JE Scheurer Michael E ME Gramatges M Monica MM Lupo Philip J PJ

Cancer 20190628 20

<h4>Background</h4>Curative therapy places childhood cancer survivors at increased risk for second primary malignancies (SPMs). However, there have been few population-based attempts to characterize differences between outcomes of SPMs in childhood cancer survivors and outcomes of first primary malignancies (FPMs).<h4>Methods</h4>Clinical and demographic information about childhood cancer survivors who developed SPMs and individuals with comparable FPMs was extracted from the Surveillance, Epide ...[more]

PMID: 31251393

Similar Datasets

Project description:With recent advances in treatment modalities, the survival time for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has increased, along with the likelihood of recurrence of a second primary tumor. However, patient treatment options and prognosis remain uncertain. This research evaluated the survival rates of patients with SCLC with a second malignancy, aiming to provide new insights and statistics on whether to proceed with more active therapy. SCLC patients were selected based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, updated on April 15, 2021. We defined those with SCLC followed by other cancers (1st of 2 or more primaries) in the sequence number as S-second primary malignant cancer (S-SPM). Those who had other cancers followed by SCLC (2nd of 2 or more primaries) were defined as OC-SCLC. We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, life table analysis, univariate analysis, stratified analysis, and multiple regression analysis of patient data. We considered the difference statistically meaningful at P < .05. After selection, data for 88,448 participants from the SEER database was included in our analysis. The mean survival time for patients with S-SPM was 69.349 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.939, 72.759), and the medium duration of survival was 34 months (95% CI: 29.900, 38.100). Univariate analysis showed that for overall survival, the hazard ratio (HR) of S-SPM was 0.367 (95% CI: 0.351, 0.383), which was 0.633 lower than that of patients with solitary SCLC and 0.606 lower than that of patients with OC-SCLC. For cancer-specific survival (CSS), the HR of S-SPM was 0.285 (95% CI: 0.271, 0.301), which was 0.715 lower than for patients with solitary SCLC and 0.608 lower than that for patients with OC-SCLC. Multiple regression analysis showed that the HR values of S-SPM were lower than those of patients with single SCLC and those with OC-SCLC, before and after adjustment for variables. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients with S-SPM had significantly better survival times than the other groups. The survival time and prognosis of patients with S-SPM were clearly superior to those with single SCLC and OC-SCLC.

Project description:BackgroundWith the development of surgical techniques and advances in systemic treatments, the survival time of esophageal cancer survivors has increased; however, the chance of developing a second primary malignancy (SPM) has also increased. These patients' prognosis and treatment plans remain inconclusive.ObjectivesWe aimed to evaluate and predict the survival of patients with esophageal cancer with second primary tumors, to provide insights and the latest data on whether to pursue more aggressive treatment.Materials and methodsWe selected esophageal cancer cases from the latest available data from the SEER database on April 15, 2021. We performed life table analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the patient data. We conducted multiple Cox regression equation analyses under multiple covariate adjustment models, and performed a stratified analysis of multiple Cox regression equation analysis based on different covariates. To describe our study population more simply and clearly, we defined the group of patients with esophageal cancer combined with a second primary malignant tumor (the first of two or more primaries) as the EC-SPM group.ResultsOur analysis of 73,456 patients with esophageal cancer found the median survival time of the EC-SPM group was 47.00 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 43.87-50.13), and the mean survival time was 74.67 months (95% CI, 72.12-77.22). Kaplan-Meier curves of different esophageal cancer survivors showed that the survival of the EC-SPM group was significantly better than that of the other groups (p < 0.01). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that compared with only one malignancy only group, the hazard ratio (HR) of the EC-SPM group was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99; p < 0.05). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis under different adjustment models, the EC-SPM group had a reduced risk of death compared with the one primary malignancy only group (HR < 1, p < 0.05).ConclusionSurvivors of esophageal cancer with a second primary malignant cancer have a better prognosis, but require more aggressive treatment. This study provided new evidence and new ideas for future research on the pathophysiological mechanism and treatment concepts of esophageal cancer combined with SPM.

Project description:The cancer survivor population is growing due to advances in detection and treatment. For improved long-term patient management, it is critical to examine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of second primary malignancies (SPMs). An SPM is defined as a second distinct pathological diagnosis, with the same or different origin as the first primary malignancy (FPM). In the present retrospective study, categorical clinical variables were compared between subgroups and the impact on overall survival was evaluated. A total of 1,188 patients with an FPM were included, of which 102 experienced an SPM (8.59%). When compared with the patients who did not develop an SPM, patients with an SPM were significantly older at first diagnosis, had a higher pathological stage and higher rates of biliary tract disease and thyroid disease. In addition, patients with an SPM were more likely to have received postoperative chemotherapy (28.43 vs. 12.16%, P<0.0001) and to be long-term consumers of cigarettes and alcohol (25.00 vs. 8.95%, P<0.05). In addition, an increase in the number of regimens received but not in the number of courses of chemotherapy was associated with a reduction in the time interval to SPM development. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most common type of FPM (18.27%). In patients with NSCLC the occurrence of SPMs was relatively low (5.07%) and the SPM-associated mortality rate was 2.30%. Breast cancer was the second common type of FPM (12.09%). Patients with breast cancer had a relatively high likelihood of developing an SPM (9.30%), for which family history of malignancy and postoperative chemotherapy were identified as potential risk factors. Patients with stomach cancer were the most vulnerable to SPM (17.95%) and patients with digestive tract cancer had the longest time interval between the FPM and SPM development. In addition, thyroid adenoma was identified as a potential risk factor for SCLC. The findings of the present study may provide valuable guidance for the short- and long-term monitoring of FPM survivors.

Dataset Information

Survival disparities for second primary malignancies diagnosed among childhood cancer survivors: A population-based assessment.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Survival disparities for second primary malignancies diagnosed among childhood cancer survivors: A population-based assessment.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets