Dataset Information

Treatment of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Several options have been proposed for the treatment of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts (cEHPSS) in dogs, but formal comparisons among different treatment options are currently unavailable. A previous evidence-based review (2012) found low quality of evidence for papers assessing the treatment of cEHPSS in dogs.

Objectives

To assess the quality of evidence available in the treatment of cEHPSS, summarize the current state of knowledge with respect to outcome after cEHPSS management, and compare different treatment techniques.

Animals

Not used.

Methods

A bibliographic search was performed without date or language restrictions. Studies were assessed for quality of evidence (study design, study group sizes, subject enrollment quality, and overall risk of bias) and outcome measures reported (perioperative outcome, clinical outcome, and surgical or interventional outcome), all reported with 95% confidence intervals. A network meta-analysis was performed.

Results

Forty-eight studies were included. Six retrospective studies (grade 4b) compared 2 techniques and 7 were abstracts (grade 5). The quality of evidence was low and risk of bias high. Regarding surgical outcome, statistically significant superiority of ameroid constrictor over thin film band was observed (P = .003). No other comparisons were statistically significant.

Conclusions and clinical importance

The evidence base of choice of treatment of cEHPSS in dogs remains weak despite recent publications on the subject. Ameroid is superior to thin film band in causing EHPSS closure. Blinded randomized studies comparing different treatment modalities, which routinely include postoperative imaging to assess cEHPSS closure and acquired portosystemic shunt development are essential.

SUBMITTER: Serrano G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6766526 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Treatment of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Serrano Gonçalo G Charalambous Marios M Charalambous Marios M Devriendt Nausikaa N de Rooster Hilde H Mortier Femke F Paepe Dominique D

Journal of veterinary internal medicine 20190831 5

<h4>Background</h4>Several options have been proposed for the treatment of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts (cEHPSS) in dogs, but formal comparisons among different treatment options are currently unavailable. A previous evidence-based review (2012) found low quality of evidence for papers assessing the treatment of cEHPSS in dogs.<h4>Objectives</h4>To assess the quality of evidence available in the treatment of cEHPSS, summarize the current state of knowledge with respect to outcome ...[more]

PMID: 31471995

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPortosystemic shunts, including surgical portosystemic shunts and transjugular intra-hepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), may have benefit over endoscopic therapy (ET) for treatment of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension; however, whether there being a survival benefit among them remains unclear. This study was to compare the effect of three above-mentioned therapies on the short-term and long-term survival in patient with cirrhosis.MethodsUsing the terms "variceal hemorrhage or variceal bleeding or variceal re-bleeding" OR "esophageal and gastric varices" OR "portal hypertension" and "liver cirrhosis," the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, and the references of identified trials were searched for human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in any language with full texts or abstracts (last search June 2017). Risk ratio (RR) estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random effects model by Review Manager. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for the assessment of the risk of bias.ResultsTwenty-six publications comprising 28 RCTs were included in this analysis. These studies included a total of 2845 patients: 496 (4 RCTs) underwent either surgical portosystemic shunts or TIPS, 1244 (9 RCTs) underwent either surgical portosystemic shunts or ET, and 1105 (15 RCTs) underwent either TIPS or ET. There was no significant difference in overall mortality and 30-day or 6-week survival among three interventions. Compared with TIPS and ET, separately, surgical portosystemic shunts were both associated with a lower bleeding-related mortality (RR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01-0.32; P < 0.001; RR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.06-0.51, P < 0.005) and rate of variceal re-bleeding (RR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.10-0.51, P < 0.001; RR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.04-0.24, P < 0.001), without a significant difference in the rate of postoperative hepatic encephalopathy (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.25-1.00, P = 0.14; RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.59-2.01, P = 0.78). TIPS showed a trend toward lower variceal re-bleeding (RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.36-0.58, P < 0.001), but a higher incidence of hepatic encephalopathy than ET (RR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.34-2.36, P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe overall analysis revealed that there seem to be no short-term and long-term survival advantage, but surgical portosystemic shunts are with the lowest bleeding-related mortality among the three therapies. Surgical portosystemic shunts may be the most effective without an increased risk of hepatic encephalopathy and TIPS is superior to ET but at the cost of a higher incidence of hepatic encephalopathy. However, some of findings should be interpreted with caution due to the lower level of evidence and the existence of significant heterogeneity.

Project description:BackgroundThere is limited information regarding percutaneous transvenous coil embolization (PTCE) for single extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (PSS). This study aimed to describe the procedure and outcome of PTCE in dogs with a single extrahepatic PSS. Forty-two privately owned dogs were included in this study. All dogs were diagnosed with extrahepatic PSS by computed tomography (CT). Preoperative CT images were used to evaluate the diameter of the PSS for coil placement. A multipurpose balloon catheter was percutaneously inserted into the PSS via the jugular vein, and transvenous retrograde portography (TRP) and measurement of blood pressure in the PSS (pPSS) were performed during balloon inflation; one or more embolization coils were implanted via the catheter.ResultsIn most cases, preoperative median fasting and postprandial serum total bile acid (TBA) concentrations were high (fasting, 86.5 μmol/L [ 3.7-250.0 μmol/L]; postprandial, 165.5 μmol/L [ 1.5-565.0 μmol/L]). CT revealed that 30 dogs had left gastrophrenic shunt; eight had left gastroazygos shunt; and one each had left gastrocaval, splenocaval, splenophrenic, and left colocaval shunt. TRP revealed that intrahepatic portal vascularity was clearly detectable in all dogs. The median values of pPSS before and during the balloon occlusion were 4.8 mmHg [2.0-13.0 mmHg] and 8.6 mmHg [5.0-18.0 mmHg], respectively. The median number and diameter of coils used were 2 coils [1 - 5 coils] and 8.0 mm [4.0 - 12.0 mm], respectively. The median times of irradiation and PTCE were 9 min [4-26 min] and 40 min [23-75 min], respectively. The median fasting and postprandial TBAs significantly decreased to 8.2 μmol/L [0.3-45.1 μmol/L, n = 38, p = 0.0028] and 19.8 μmol/L [0.3-106.7 μmol/L, n = 38, p = 0.0018], respectively, approximately 1 month after PTCE. The clinical success rate of PTCE without requirement for a second surgery was 95.2% (40/42 dogs). During revision surgery, one dog underwent surgical ligation and, in another dog, an ameroid constrictor was placed.ConclusionsPTCE was clinically effective in treating single extrahepatic PSS in dogs. Preoperative CT and TRP prior to PTCE might be clinically valuable for choosing the size of embolization coils, deciding the appropriate location of coil implantation, and estimating the number of coils to be implanted. PTCE is a promising alternative to conventional surgical procedures for single extrahepatic PSS in dogs.

Dataset Information

Treatment of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Objectives

Animals

Methods

Results

Conclusions and clinical importance

Publications

Treatment of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets