Dataset Information

Pathogenicity of new BEST1 variants identified in Italian patients with best vitelliform macular dystrophy assessed by computational structural biology.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) is an autosomal dominant macular degeneration. The typical central yellowish yolk-like lesion usually appears in childhood and gradually worsens. Most cases are caused by variants in the BEST1 gene which encodes bestrophin-1, an integral membrane protein found primarily in the retinal pigment epithelium. METHODS:Here we describe the spectrum of BEST1 variants identified in a cohort of 57 Italian patients analyzed by Sanger sequencing. In 13 cases, the study also included segregation analysis in affected and unaffected relatives. We used molecular mechanics to calculate two quantitative parameters related to calcium-activated chloride channel (CaCC composed of 5 BEST1 subunits) stability and calcium-dependent activation and related them to the potential pathogenicity of individual missense variants detected in the probands. RESULTS:Thirty-six out of 57 probands (63% positivity) and 16 out of 18 relatives proved positive to genetic testing. Family study confirmed the variable penetrance and expressivity of the disease. Six of the 27 genetic variants discovered were novel: p.(Val9Gly), p.(Ser108Arg), p.(Asn179Asp), p.(Trp182Arg), p.(Glu292Gln) and p.(Asn296Lys). All BEST1 variants were assessed in silico for potential pathogenicity. Our computational structural biology approach based on 3D model structure of the CaCC showed that individual amino acid replacements may affect channel shape, stability, activation, gating, selectivity and throughput, and possibly also other features, depending on where the individual mutated amino acid residues are located in the tertiary structure of BEST1. Statistically significant correlations between mean logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), age and modulus of computed BEST1 dimerization energies, which reflect variations in the in CaCC stability due to amino acid changes, permitted us to assess the pathogenicity of individual BEST1 variants. CONCLUSIONS:Using this computational approach, we designed a method for estimating BCVA progression in patients with BEST1 variants.

SUBMITTER: Frecer V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6771118 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pathogenicity of new BEST1 variants identified in Italian patients with best vitelliform macular dystrophy assessed by computational structural biology.

Frecer Vladimir V Iarossi Giancarlo G Salvetti Anna Paola AP Maltese Paolo Enrico PE Delledonne Giulia G Oldani Marta M Staurenghi Giovanni G Falsini Benedetto B Minnella Angelo Maria AM Ziccardi Lucia L Magli Adriano A Colombo Leonardo L D'Esposito Fabiana F Miertus Jan J Viola Francesco F Attanasio Marcella M Maggio Emilia E Bertelli Matteo M

Journal of translational medicine 20191001 1

<h4>Background</h4>Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) is an autosomal dominant macular degeneration. The typical central yellowish yolk-like lesion usually appears in childhood and gradually worsens. Most cases are caused by variants in the BEST1 gene which encodes bestrophin-1, an integral membrane protein found primarily in the retinal pigment epithelium.<h4>Methods</h4>Here we describe the spectrum of BEST1 variants identified in a cohort of 57 Italian patients analyzed by Sanger seque ...[more]

PMID: 31570112

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE: To analyze functional and clinical data of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD) patients with mutations in the BEST1 gene. METHODS: Best VMD patients with BEST1 mutations were evaluated prospectively regarding age, age of onset, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography, and electro-oculography. Mutations in BEST1 were established by direct sequencing. RESULTS: Forty-six eyes of 23 patients (10 male, 13 female) were included in the study. We identified nine different BEST1 mutations (3/9 novel), in ten unrelated families. The age of patients ranged between 3 and 75 years; age of onset varied between 2 and 67 years. BCVA ranged between 20/20 and 20/200. On the basis of fundus biomicroscopy with direct illumination, using one widely accepted classification, the macular lesions could be counted as follows: 1. no lesion (normal fovea): eight eyes, five patients carrying a mutation on the BEST1 gene; 2. previtelliform lesions: six eyes, three affected patients; 3. vitelliform lesions: four eyes, two affected patients; 4. pseudohypopyon: three eyes, three affected patients; 5. vitelliruptive lesions (scrambled egg aspect with dispersion of the vitelliform material without sign of atrophy or fibrosis): ten eyes, six affected patients; 6. atrophic lesions (atrophy with or without residual dispersed material): seven eyes, five patients; 7. fibrotic lesions: eight eyes, five patients. Two patients presented unilateral Best VMD. Both eyes of two patients presented multifocal Best VMD features on fundus examination. Six eyes of four patients have been treated for choroidal neovascularization by thermic photocoagulation [one eye], photodynamic therapy [three eyes], and intravitreal ranibizumab injection [two eyes]. Comparison of interfamilial and intrafamilial clinical data between patients did not reveal differences in age, BCVA, and stage of the disease as evaluated by fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography (p>0.05). Mean BCVA impairment showed a statistically significant correlation to a more advanced stage of the disease (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BEST1 mutations were not correlated with the severity of the functional and clinical data in the Best VMD patients examined.

Project description:Demonstrating the utility of adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) to assess outer retinal structure in Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD).To characterize outer retinal structure in BVMD using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and AOSLO.Prospective, observational case series. Four symptomatic members of a family with BVMD with known BEST1 mutation were recruited at the Advanced Ocular Imaging Program research lab at the Medical College of Wisconsin Eye Institute, Milwaukee.Thickness of 2 outer retinal layers corresponding to photoreceptor inner and outer segments was measured using SD-OCT. Photoreceptor mosaic AOSLO images within and around visible lesions were obtained, and cone density was assessed in 2 subjects.Photoreceptor structure.Each subject was at a different stage of BVMD, with photoreceptor disruption evident by AOSLO at all stages. When comparing SD-OCT and AOSLO images from the same location, AOSLO images allowed for direct assessment of photoreceptor structure. A variable degree of retained photoreceptors was seen within all lesions. The photoreceptor mosaic immediately adjacent to visible lesions appeared contiguous and was of normal density. Fine hyperreflective structures were visualized by AOSLO, and their anatomical orientation and size were consistent with Henle fibers.AND RELEVANCE: The AOSLO findings indicate that substantial photoreceptor structure persists within active lesions, accounting for good visual acuity in these patients. Despite previous reports of diffuse photoreceptor outer segment abnormalities in BVMD, our data reveal normal photoreceptor structure in areas adjacent to clinical lesions. This study demonstrates the utility of AOSLO for understanding the spectrum of cellular changes that occur in inherited degenerations such as BVMD. Photoreceptors are often significantly affected at various stages of inherited degenerations, and these changes may not be readily apparent with current clinical imaging instrumentation.

Project description:PurposeTo analyze fixation location and stability in best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and test their association with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).DesignObservational, cross-sectional study.ParticipantsThirty patients (55 eyes) affected by genetically confirmed BVMD were followed up at the Retinal Heredodystrophies Unit of IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan.MethodsPatients underwent testing with macular integrity assessment (MAIA) microperimeter. Fixation location was measured as distance in degrees (°) between preferred retinal locus (PRL) and estimated fovea location (EFL); fixation was defined as eccentric when the distance between PRL and EFL exceeded 2°. Fixation stability was graded as stable, relatively unstable, or unstable and expressed as bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA, °2).Main outcome measuresFixation location and stability.ResultsThe median distance of the PRL from the anatomic fovea was 0.7°, and fixation location was eccentric in 27% of eyes. Fixation was graded as stable in 64% of eyes, relatively unstable in 13%, and unstable in 24%, with a median 95% BCEA of 6.2°2. The atrophic/fibrotic stage was associated with worse fixation parameters (all P < 0.01). Both PRL eccentricity and fixation stability were linearly associated with BCVA: every 1° increase in PRL eccentricity was associated with a 0.07 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) worse BCVA (P < 0.0001) while every 1°2 increase in 95% BCEA was associated with a 0.01 logMAR worse BCVA (P < 0.001). No significant intereye correlation was found for PRL eccentricity and fixation stability, as well as no association between the patient's age and fixation parameters.ConclusionsWe demonstrated that most eyes affected by BVMD retain a central stable fixation and provided evidence that both fixation eccentricity and stability are strongly associated with visual acuity in BVMD. These parameters may serve as secondary end points for future clinical trials.Financial disclosuresProprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Project description:AIMS: To describe genetic and clinical findings in a French family affected by best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). METHODS: We screened eight at-risk members of a family, including a BVMD-affected proband, by direct sequencing of 11 bestrophin-1 (BEST1) exons. Individuals underwent ophthalmic examination and autofluorescent fundus imaging, indocyanine green angiography, electro-oculogram (EOG), electroretinogram (ERG), multifocal ERG, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and where possible, spectral domain OCT. RESULTS: The sequence analysis of the BEST1 gene revealed one previously unknown mutation, c.15C>A (p.Y5X), in two family members and one recently described mutation, c.430A>G (p.S144G), in five family members. Fundus examination and electrophysiological responses provided no evidence of the disease in the patient carrying only the p.Y5X mutation. Three patients with the p.S144G mutation did not show any preclinical sign of BVMD except altered EOGs. Two individuals of the family exhibited a particularly severe phenotype of multifocal BVMD-one individual carrying the p.S144G mutation heterozygously and one individual harboring both BEST1 mutations (p.S144G inherited from his mother and p.Y5X from his father). Both of these family members had multifocal vitelliform autofluorescent lesions combined with abnormal EOG, and the spectral domain OCT displayed a serous retinal detachment. In addition, ERGs demonstrated widespread retinal degeneration and multifocal ERGs showed a reduction in the central retina function, which could be correlated with the decreased visual acuity and visual field scotomas. CONCLUSIONS: A thorough clinical evaluation found no pathological phenotype in the patient carrying the isolated p.Y5X mutation. The patients carrying the p.S144G variation in the protein exhibited considerable intrafamilial phenotypic variability. Two young affected patients in this family exhibited an early onset, severe, multifocal BVMD with a diffuse distribution of autofluorescent deposits throughout the retina and rapid evolution toward the loss of central vision. The other genetically affected relatives had only abnormal EOGs and displayed no or extremely slow electrophysiological evolution.

Dataset Information

Pathogenicity of new BEST1 variants identified in Italian patients with best vitelliform macular dystrophy assessed by computational structural biology.

Publications

Pathogenicity of new BEST1 variants identified in Italian patients with best vitelliform macular dystrophy assessed by computational structural biology.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets