Dataset Information

Safety of Anteromedial Portals in Elbow Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:To systematically review available literature comparing location and safety of 2 common anteromedial portals with nearby neurovascular structures in cadaveric models and to determine the correct positioning and preparation of the joint before elbow arthroscopy. METHODS:The review was devised in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria consisted of original, cadaveric studies performed by experienced surgeons on male or female elbows evaluating anteromedial portal placement with regard to proximity of the arthroscope to neurovascular structures. Exclusion criteria consisted of case reports, clinical series, non-English language studies, and noncadaveric studies. Statistical analysis was done to measure reviewer reliability after scoring of each study. RESULTS:During screening, 2,596 studies were identified, and 10 studies met final inclusion as original, cadaveric investigations of anteromedial portal proximity to neurovascular structures. The difference in distance between proximal and distal portals was <1 mm for the brachial artery and <1.5 mm for the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, whereas the ulnar nerve was 4.17 mm further from the distal portal and the median nerve was 5.07 mm further from the proximal portal. Joint distension increased the distances of neurovascular structures to portal sites, with the exception of the ulnar nerve in distal portals. Elbow flexion to 90° increased distances of all neurovascular structures to portal sites. CONCLUSION:The results show that the proximal anteromedial portal puts fewer structures at risk compared with the distal portal. Elbows in 90° flexion with joint distension carry a lower risk for neurovascular injury during portal placement. These findings suggest the proximal anteromedial portal to be the safer technique in anteromedial arthroscopy of the elbow. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:Discrepancies in placement of portals have existed in the literature, indicating differing safety margins regarding surrounding neurovascular anatomy. The present study aims to link together the literature-based evidence to describe the safest anteromedial portal variation.

SUBMITTER: Cushing T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6774249 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Safety of Anteromedial Portals in Elbow Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies.

Cushing Tucker T Finley Zachary Z O'Brien Michael J MJ Savoie Felix H FH Myers Leann L Medvedev Gleb G

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association 20190701 7

<h4>Purpose</h4>To systematically review available literature comparing location and safety of 2 common anteromedial portals with nearby neurovascular structures in cadaveric models and to determine the correct positioning and preparation of the joint before elbow arthroscopy.<h4>Methods</h4>The review was devised in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria consisted of original, cadaveric studies performed by experienced s ...[more]

PMID: 31272638

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThis investigation's purpose was to perform a systematic review of the literature examining the biomechanics of the ligaments comprising the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis with specific attention to their resistance to translational and rotational forces. Although current syndesmosis repair techniques can achieve an anatomic reduction, they may not reapproximate native ankle biomechanics, resulting in loss of reduction, joint overconstraint, or lack of external rotation resistance. Armed with a contemporary understanding of individual ligament biomechanics, future operative strategies can target key stabilizing structure(s), translating to a repair better equipped to resist anatomic displacing forces.Study designSystematic review.MethodsA systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using a PRISMA checklist. Biomechanical studies testing cadaveric lower limb specimens in the intact and injured state measuring the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis resistance to translational and rotational forces were included in this review. Only studies that included numerical data were included in this review; studies that only reported figures and graphs were excluded.ResultsTwelve studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two studies determined the mechanical properties of syndesmotic ligaments, finding superior strength and stiffness of the interosseous ligament (IOL), as compared to the anterior (AITFL) or posteroinferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL). Four studies examined native ankle biomechanics establishing physiologic range of motion of the fibula relative to the tibia. Fibular range of motion was found to be up to 2.53 mm of posterior translation (Markolf et al), 1.00 mm lateral translation (Xenos et al), 3.6 degrees of external rotation (Burssens et al), and 1.4 degrees of internal rotation (Clanton et al). Four studies evaluated syndesmotic biomechanics under physiological loading and found that the AITFL, IOL, and PITFL provide the majority of resistance to external rotation, diastasis, and internal rotation, respectively. Two studies investigated the biomechanics of clinically and intraoperatively used tests for syndesmotic injuries and found increased sensitivity of sagittal plane posterior fibular translation, as opposed to coronal plane lateral fibular translation for unstable injuries.ConclusionsStudy findings suggest that although the IOL is the strongest syndesmotic ligament, the AITFL has a dominant role stabilizing the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis to external rotation force. Because of these characteristics, operative repair of the AITFL along its native vector may provide a more biomechanically advantageous construct and should be investigated clinically. Additionally, evaluation of clinical stress tests revealed that the external rotation stress test is the most sensitive test to recognize an AITFL tear, and that a 3-ligament disruption is needed to cause diastasis greater than 2 mm.

Dataset Information

Safety of Anteromedial Portals in Elbow Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies.

Publications

Safety of Anteromedial Portals in Elbow Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets