Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Importance
End-of-life decisions occur daily in intensive care units (ICUs) around the world, and these practices could change over time.Objective
To determine the changes in end-of-life practices in European ICUs after 16 years.Design, setting, and participants
Ethicus-2 was a prospective observational study of 22 European ICUs previously included in the Ethicus-1 study (1999-2000). During a self-selected continuous 6-month period at each ICU, consecutive patients who died or had any limitation of life-sustaining therapy from September 2015 until October 2016 were included. Patients were followed up until death or until 2 months after the first treatment limitation decision.Exposures
Comparison between the 1999-2000 cohort vs 2015-2016 cohort.Main outcomes and measures
End-of-life outcomes were classified into 5 mutually exclusive categories (withholding of life-prolonging therapy, withdrawing of life-prolonging therapy, active shortening of the dying process, failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], brain death). The primary outcome was whether patients received any treatment limitations (withholding or withdrawing of life-prolonging therapy or shortening of the dying process). Outcomes were determined by senior intensivists.Results
Of 13?625 patients admitted to participating ICUs during the 2015-2016 study period, 1785 (13.1%) died or had limitations of life-prolonging therapies and were included in the study. Compared with the patients included in the 1999-2000 cohort (n?=?2807), the patients in 2015-2016 cohort were significantly older (median age, 70 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 59-79] vs 67 years [IQR, 54-75]; P?Conclusions and relevanceAmong patients who had treatment limitations or died in 22 European ICUs in 2015-2016, compared with data reported from the same ICUs in 1999-2000, limitations in life-prolonging therapies occurred significantly more frequently and death without limitations in life-prolonging therapies occurred significantly less frequently. These findings suggest a shift in end-of-life practices in European ICUs, but the study is limited in that it excluded patients who survived ICU hospitalization without treatment limitations.
SUBMITTER: Sprung CL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6777263 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Sprung Charles L CL Ricou Bara B Hartog Christiane S CS Maia Paulo P Mentzelopoulos Spyros D SD Weiss Manfred M Levin Phillip D PD Galarza Laura L de la Guardia Veronica V Schefold Joerg C JC Baras Mario M Joynt Gavin M GM Bülow Hans-Henrik HH Nakos Georgios G Cerny Vladimir V Marsch Stephan S Girbes Armand R AR Ingels Catherine C Miskolci Orsolya O Ledoux Didier D Mullick Sudakshina S Bocci Maria G MG Gjedsted Jakob J Estébanez Belén B Nates Joseph L JL Lesieur Olivier O Sreedharan Roshni R Giannini Alberto M AM Fuciños Lucía Cachafeiro LC Danbury Christopher M CM Michalsen Andrej A Soliman Ivo W IW Estella Angel A Avidan Alexander A
JAMA 20191101 17
<h4>Importance</h4>End-of-life decisions occur daily in intensive care units (ICUs) around the world, and these practices could change over time.<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the changes in end-of-life practices in European ICUs after 16 years.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>Ethicus-2 was a prospective observational study of 22 European ICUs previously included in the Ethicus-1 study (1999-2000). During a self-selected continuous 6-month period at each ICU, consecutive patients who di ...[more]