Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Beauty Requires Thought.


ABSTRACT: The experience of beauty is a pleasure, but common sense and philosophy suggest that feeling beauty differs from sensuous pleasures such as eating or sex. Immanuel Kant [1, 2] claimed that experiencing beauty requires thought but that sensuous pleasure can be enjoyed without thought and cannot be beautiful. These venerable hypotheses persist in models of aesthetic processing [3-7] but have never been tested. Here, participants continuously rated the pleasure felt from a nominally beautiful or non-beautiful stimulus and then judged whether they had experienced beauty. The stimuli, which engage various senses, included seeing images, tasting candy, and touching a teddy bear. The observer reported the feelings that the stimulus evoked. The time course of pleasure, across stimuli, is well-fit by a model with one free parameter: pleasure amplitude. Pleasure amplitude increases linearly with the feeling of beauty. To test Kant's claim of a need for thought, we reduce cognitive capacity by adding a "two-back" task to distract the observer's thoughts. The distraction greatly reduces the beauty and pleasure experienced from stimuli that otherwise produce strong pleasure and spares that of less-pleasant stimuli. We also find that strong pleasure is always beautiful, whether produced reliably by beautiful stimuli or just occasionally by sensuous stimuli. In sum, we confirm Kant's claim that only the pleasure associated with feeling beauty requires thought and disprove his claim that sensuous pleasures cannot be beautiful.

SUBMITTER: Brielmann AA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6778408 | biostudies-literature | 2017 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Beauty Requires Thought.

Brielmann Aenne A AA   Pelli Denis G DG  

Current biology : CB 20170511 10


The experience of beauty is a pleasure, but common sense and philosophy suggest that feeling beauty differs from sensuous pleasures such as eating or sex. Immanuel Kant [1, 2] claimed that experiencing beauty requires thought but that sensuous pleasure can be enjoyed without thought and cannot be beautiful. These venerable hypotheses persist in models of aesthetic processing [3-7] but have never been tested. Here, participants continuously rated the pleasure felt from a nominally beautiful or no  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6848232 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4866329 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8514293 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10249237 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4448025 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5512728 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10337797 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5541072 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6544238 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7741088 | biostudies-literature