Dataset Information

Social Motor Priming: when offline interference facilitates motor execution.

ABSTRACT: Many daily activities involve synchronizing with other people's actions. Previous literature has revealed that a slowdown of performance occurs whenever the action to be carried out is different to the one observed (i.e., visuomotor interference). However, action execution can be facilitated by observing a different action if it calls for an interactive gesture (i.e., social motor priming). The aim of this study is to investigate the costs and benefits of spontaneously processing a social response and then executing the same or a different action. Participants performed two different types of grips, which could be either congruent or not with the socially appropriate response and with the observed action. In particular, participants performed a precision grip (PG; thumb-index fingers opposition) or a whole-hand grasp (WHG; fingers-palm opposition) after observing videos showing an actor performing a PG and addressing them (interactive condition) or not (non-interactive condition). Crucially, in the interactive condition, the most appropriate response was a WHG, but in 50 percent of trials participants were asked to perform a PG. This procedure allowed us to measure both the facilitator effect of performing an action appropriate to the social context (WHG)-but different with respect to the observed one (PG)-and the cost of inhibiting it. These effects were measured by means of 3-D kinematical analysis of movement. Results show that, in terms of reaction time and movement time, the interactive request facilitated (i.e., speeded) the socially appropriate action (WHG), whereas interfered with (i.e., delayed) a different action (PG), although observed actions were always PGs. This interference also manifested with an increase of maximum grip aperture, which seemingly reflects the concurrent representation of the socially appropriate response. Overall, these findings extend previous research by revealing that physically incongruent action representations can be integrated into a single action plan even during an offline task and without any training.

SUBMITTER: Betti S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6786249 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Social Motor Priming: when offline interference facilitates motor execution.

Betti Sonia S Chinellato Eris E Guerra Silvia S Castiello Umberto U Sartori Luisa L

PeerJ 20191007

Many daily activities involve synchronizing with other people's actions. Previous literature has revealed that a slowdown of performance occurs whenever the action to be carried out is different to the one observed (i.e., visuomotor interference). However, action execution can be facilitated by observing a different action if it calls for an interactive gesture (i.e., social motor priming). The aim of this study is to investigate the costs and benefits of spontaneously processing a social respon ...[more]

PMID: 31608173

Similar Datasets

Project description:Priming is a learning process that refers to behavioral changes caused by previous exposure to a similar stimulus. Motor imagery (MI), which involves the mental rehearsal of action representations in working memory without engaging in actual execution, could be a strategy for priming the motor system. This study investigates whether MI primes action execution in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Here, 17 people with MS (PwMS) and 19 healthy subjects (HS), all right-handed and good imaginers, performed as accurately and quickly as possible, with a pencil, actual or mental pointing movements between targets of small (1.0 × 1.0 cm) or large (1.5 × 1.5 cm) size. In actual trials, they completed five pointing cycles between the left and right targets, whereas in mental trials, the first 4 cycles were imagined while the fifth was actually executed. The fifth cycle was introduced to assess the MI priming effect on actual execution. All conditions, presented randomly, were performed with both dominant (i.e., right) and non-dominant arms. Analysis of the duration of the first 4 cycles in both actual and mental trials confirmed previous findings, showing isochrony in HS with both arms and significantly faster mental than actual movements (anisochrony) in PwMS (p < 0.01) [time (s); HS right: actual: 4.23 ± 0.15, mental: 4.36 ± 0.16; left: actual: 4.32 ± 0.15, mental: 4.43 ± 0.18; PwMS right: actual: 5.85 ± 0.16, mental: 5.99 ± 0.21; left: actual: 6.68 ± 0.20, mental: 5.94 ± 0.23]; anisochrony in PwMS was present when the task was performed with the non-dominant arm. Of note, temporal analysis of the fifth actual cycle showed no differences between actual and mental trials for HS with both arms, whereas in PwMS the fifth actual cycle was significantly faster after the four actual cycles for the non-dominant arm (p < 0.05) [time (s); HS right: actual: 1.03 ± 0.04, mental: 1.03 ± 0.03; left: actual: 1.08 ± 0.04, mental: 1.05 ± 0.03; PwMS right: actual: 1.48 ± 0.04, mental: 1.48 ± 0.06; left: actual: 1.66 ± 0.05, mental: 1.48 ± 0.06]. These results seem to suggest that a few mental repetitions of an action might be sufficient to exert a priming effect on the actual execution of the same action in PwMS. This would indicate further investigation of the potential use of MI as a new motor-cognitive tool for MS neurorehabilitation.

Project description:BackgroundRecent studies of functional or effective connectivity in the brain have reported that motor-related brain regions were activated during motor execution and motor imagery, but the relationship between motor and cognitive areas has not yet been completely understood. The objectives of our study were to analyze the effective connectivity between motor and cognitive networks in order to define network dynamics during motor execution and motor imagery in healthy individuals. Second, we analyzed the differences in effective connectivity between correct and incorrect responses during motor execution and imagery using dynamic causal modeling (DCM) of electroencephalography (EEG) data.MethodTwenty healthy subjects performed a sequence of finger tapping trials using either motor execution or motor imagery, and the performances were recorded. Changes in effective connectivity between the primary motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor area (SMA), premotor cortex (PMC), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) were estimated using dynamic causal modeling. Bayesian model averaging with family-level inference and fixed-effects analysis was applied to determine the most likely connectivity model for these regions.ResultsMotor execution and imagery showed inputs to distinct brain regions, the premotor cortex and the supplementary motor area, respectively. During motor execution, the coupling strength of a feedforward network from the DLPFC to the PMC was greater than that during motor imagery. During motor imagery, the coupling strengths of a feedforward network from the PMC to the SMA and of a feedback network from M1 to the PMC were higher than that during motor execution. In imagined movement, although there were connectivity differences between correct and incorrect task responses, each motor imagery task that included correct and incorrect responses showed similar network connectivity characteristics. Correct motor imagery responses showed connectivity from the PMC to the DLPFC, while the incorrect responses had characteristic connectivity from the SMA to the DLPFC.ConclusionsThese findings provide an understanding of effective connectivity between motor and cognitive areas during motor execution and imagery as well as the basis for future connectivity studies for patients with stroke.

Project description:Motor learning is defined as an improvement in performance through practice. The ability to learn new motor skills may be particularly challenged in patients with Parkinson's disease, in whom motor execution is impaired by the disease-defining motor symptoms such as bradykinesia. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation is an effective treatment in advanced Parkinson's disease, and its beneficial effects on Parkinsonian motor symptoms and motor execution have been widely demonstrated. Much less is known about whether deep brain stimulation directly interacts with motor learning independent of modulation of motor execution. We investigated motor sequence learning in 19 patients with Parkinson's disease treated with subthalamic deep brain stimulation and 19 age-matched controls. In a cross-over design, patients performed an initial motor sequence training session with active and inactive stimulation, respectively (experiments separated by ≥14 days). Performance was retested after 5 min and after a 6 h consolidation interval with active stimulation. Healthy controls performed a similar experiment once. We further investigated neural correlates underlying stimulation-related effects on motor learning by exploring the association of normative subthalamic deep brain stimulation functional connectivity profiles with stimulation-related differences in performance gains during training. Pausing deep brain stimulation during initial training resulted in the inhibition of performance gains that could have been indicative of learning at the behavioural level. Task performance improved significantly during training with active deep brain stimulation, but did not reach the level of learning dynamics of healthy controls. Importantly, task performance after the 6 h consolidation interval was similar across patients with Parkinson's disease independent of whether the initial training session had been performed with active or inactive deep brain stimulation. This indicates that early learning and subsequent consolidation were relatively intact despite severe impairments of motor execution during training with inactive deep brain stimulation. Normative connectivity analyses revealed plausible and significant connectivity of volumes of tissue activated by deep brain stimulation with several cortical areas. However, no specific connectivity profiles were associated with stimulation-dependent differences in learning during initial training. Our results show that motor learning in Parkinson's disease is independent of modulation of motor execution by subthalamic deep brain stimulation. This indicates an important role of the subthalamic nucleus in regulating general motor execution, whereas its role in motor learning appears negligible. Because longer-term outcomes were independent of performance gains during initial training, patients with Parkinson's disease may not need to wait for an optimal motor state to practice new motor skills.

Dataset Information

Social Motor Priming: when offline interference facilitates motor execution.

Publications

Social Motor Priming: when offline interference facilitates motor execution.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets