Dataset Information

ECMO with vasopressor use during early endotoxic shock: Can it improve circulatory support and regional microcirculatory blood flow?

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:While extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is effective in preventing further hypoxemia and maintains blood flow in endotoxin-induced shock, ECMO alone does not reverse the hypotension. In this study, we tested whether concurrent vasopressor use with ECMO would provide increased circulatory support and blood flow, and characterized regional blood flow distribution to vital organs. METHODS:Endotoxic shock was induced in piglets to achieve a 30% decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP). Measurements of untreated pigs were compared to pigs treated with ECMO alone or ECMO and vasopressors. RESULTS:ECMO provided cardiac support during vasodilatory endotoxic shock and improved oxygen delivery, but vasopressor therapy was required to return MAP to normotensive levels. Increased blood pressure with vasopressors did not alter oxygen consumption or extraction compared to ECMO alone. Regional microcirculatory blood flow (RBF) to the brain, kidney, and liver were maintained or increased during ECMO with and without vasopressors. CONCLUSION:ECMO support and concurrent vasopressor use improve regional blood flow and oxygen delivery even in the absence of full blood pressure restoration. Vasopressor-induced selective distribution of blood flow to vital organs is retained when vasopressors are administered with ECMO.

SUBMITTER: Mu TS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6786553 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

ECMO with vasopressor use during early endotoxic shock: Can it improve circulatory support and regional microcirculatory blood flow?

Mu Thornton S TS Becker Amy M AM Clark Aaron J AJ Batts Sherreen G SG Murata Lee-Ann M LM Uyehara Catherine F T CFT

PloS one 20191010 10

<h4>Introduction</h4>While extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is effective in preventing further hypoxemia and maintains blood flow in endotoxin-induced shock, ECMO alone does not reverse the hypotension. In this study, we tested whether concurrent vasopressor use with ECMO would provide increased circulatory support and blood flow, and characterized regional blood flow distribution to vital organs.<h4>Methods</h4>Endotoxic shock was induced in piglets to achieve a 30% decrease in mean a ...[more]

PMID: 31600278

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCirculatory shock and multi-organ failure remain major contributors to morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients and are associated with insufficient oxygen availability in the tissue. Intrinsic mechanisms to improve tissue perfusion, such as up-regulation of functional capillary density (FCD) and red blood cell velocity (RBCv), have been identified as maneuvers to improve oxygen extraction by the tissues; however, their role in circulatory shock and potential use as resuscitation targets remains unknown. To fill this gap, we examined the baseline and maximum recruitable FCD and RBCv in response to a topical nitroglycerin stimulus (FCDNG, RBCvNG) in patients with and without circulatory shock to test whether this may be a method to identify the presence and magnitude of a microcirculatory reserve capacity important for identifying a resuscitation target.MethodsSublingual handheld vital microscopy was performed after initial resuscitation in mechanically ventilated patients consecutively admitted to a tertiary medical ICU. FCD and RBCv were quantified using an automated computer vision algorithm (MicroTools). Patients with circulatory shock were retrospectively identified via standardized hemodynamic and clinical criteria and compared to patients without circulatory shock.Results54 patients (57 ± 14y, BMI 26.3 ± 4.9 kg/m2, SAPS 56 ± 19, 65% male) were included, 13 of whom presented with circulatory shock. Both groups had similar cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, RBCv, and RBCvNG. Heart rate (p < 0.001), central venous pressure (p = 0.02), lactate (p < 0.001), capillary refill time (p < 0.01), and Mottling score (p < 0.001) were higher in circulatory shock after initial resuscitation, while FCD and FCDNG were 10% lower (16.9 ± 4.2 and 18.9 ± 3.2, p < 0.01; 19.3 ± 3.1 and 21.3 ± 2.9, p = 0.03). Nitroglycerin response was similar in both groups, and circulatory shock patients reached FCDNG similar to baseline FCD found in patients without shock.ConclusionCritically ill patients suffering from circulatory shock were found to present with a lower sublingual FCD. The preserved nitroglycerin response suggests a dysfunction of intrinsic regulation mechanisms to increase the microcirculatory oxygen extraction capacity associated with circulatory shock and identifies a potential resuscitation target. These differences in microcirculatory hemodynamic function between patients with and without circulatory shock were not reflected in blood pressure or cardiac index.

Project description:OBJECTIVES:To review temporary percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices for the treatment of cardiogenic shock, including current evidence, contraindications, complications, and future directions. DATA SOURCES:A MEDLINE search was conducted with MeSH terms: cardiogenic shock, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Impella, and TandemHeart. STUDY SELECTION:Selected publications included randomized controlled trial data and observational studies describing experience with percutaneous mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. DATA EXTRACTION:Studies were chosen based on strength of association with and relevance to cardiogenic shock. DATA SYNTHESIS:Until recently, there were few options if cardiogenic shock was refractory to vasopressors or intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation. Now, several percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices, including Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA), TandemHeart (CardiacAssist, Pittsburgh, PA), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, are more accessible. Compared with intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella provides greater hemodynamic support but no reduction in mortality. Similarly, TandemHeart improves hemodynamic variables but not survival. Comparative studies have been underpowered for mortality because of small sample size. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation offers the advantage of biventricular circulatory support and oxygenation, but there are significant vascular complications. Comparative studies with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have not been completed. Despite lack of randomized controlled data, there has been a substantial increase in use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support. Several ongoing prospective studies with larger sample sizes may provide answers, and newer devices may become smaller, easier to insert, and more effective. CONCLUSIONS:Mortality from cardiogenic shock remains unacceptably high despite early coronary revascularization or other therapies. Although evidence is lacking and complications rates are high, improvements and experience with percutaneous mechanical circulatory support may offer the prospect of better outcomes.

Dataset Information

ECMO with vasopressor use during early endotoxic shock: Can it improve circulatory support and regional microcirculatory blood flow?

Publications

ECMO with vasopressor use during early endotoxic shock: Can it improve circulatory support and regional microcirculatory blood flow?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets