Dataset Information

One-year clinical outcomes of anticoagulation therapy among Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: The Hyogo AF Network (HAF-NET) Registry.

ABSTRACT: Background:Although anticoagulation therapy could reduce the risk of strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), large-scale investigations in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and AF catheter ablation (CA) era are lacking. Methods:This study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, observational study and a total of 2113 patients from 22 institutions were enrolled in the Hyogo area. Results:The mean age and CHADS2 score were 70.1 ± 10.8 years old and 1.5 ± 1.1, respectively. The follow-up period was 355 ± 43 days. CA was performed in 614 (29%) and DOACs were prescribed in 1118 (53%) patients. Ischemic strokes/systemic embolisms (SEs) and major bleeding occurred in 13 (0.6%) and 17 (0.8%) patients, respectively. New onset dementia, hospitalizations for cardiac events, and all-cause death occurred in eight (0.4%), 60 (2.8%), and 29 (1.4%) patients, respectively. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that persistent AF and the body weight (BW) were associated with ischemic strokes/SEs and major bleeding, respectively (persistent AF: hazard ratio, 9.57; 95%CI, 1.2-74.0; P = .03; BW: hazard ratio, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.90-0.99; P = .02). AFCA history was associated with the cardiac events (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95%CI, 0.20-0.99; P = .04). Age was associated with new onset dementia (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95%CI, 1.0-1.2; P = .03). Conclusions:In the DOAC and CA era, the incidence of ischemic strokes/SEs, major bleeding and cardiac events could be dramatically reduced in patients with AF. However, some unsolved issues of AF management still remain especially in elderly patients with persistent AF and a low BW.

SUBMITTER: Hyogo K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6786980 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

One-year clinical outcomes of anticoagulation therapy among Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: The Hyogo AF Network (HAF-NET) Registry.

Hyogo Kiyohiro K Yoshida Akihiro A Takeuchi Motoshi M Kiuchi Kunihiko K Fukuzawa Koji K Takami Mitsuru M Kobori Atsushi A Okajima Katsunori K Odake Michio M Okada Toshio T Shimane Akira A Kawahara Yasuhiro Y Sekiya Junichi J Sano Hiroshi H Ichikawa Yasunori Y Hirata Ken-Ichi KI

Journal of arrhythmia 20190816 5

<h4>Background</h4>Although anticoagulation therapy could reduce the risk of strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), large-scale investigations in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and AF catheter ablation (CA) era are lacking.<h4>Methods</h4>This study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, observational study and a total of 2113 patients from 22 institutions were enrolled in the Hyogo area.<h4>Results</h4>The mean age and CHADS<sub>2</sub> score were 70.1 ± 10.8 years old an ...[more]

PMID: 31624507

Similar Datasets

Project description:Whereas insurance status has been previously associated with care patterns, little is currently known about the association between Medicaid insurance and the clinical characteristics, treatment, or outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).We used data from adults with AF enrolled in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of AF (ORBIT-AF), a national outpatient registry conducted at 176 community, multispecialty sites. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of patients prescribed any oral anticoagulation (OAC; warfarin or novel oral anticoagulants [NOAC]). Secondary outcomes of interest included the proportion of patients prescribed NOACs (dabigatran or rivaroxaban); time in therapeutic range (TTR) for warfarin users, all-cause mortality, stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleed. Of 10 133 patients, N=470 (4.6%) had Medicaid insurance. Medicaid patients were similarly likely to receive OAC at baseline (72.8% vs 76.3%; unadjusted P=0.079), but less likely to receive NOAC at baseline or follow-up (12.1% vs 16.3%; unadjusted P=0.019). After risk adjustment, Medicaid status was associated with lower use of OAC at baseline among patients with high stroke risk (odds ratio [OR]=0.68; 95% CI=0.49, 0.94), but was not associated with OAC use overall (OR=0.82; 95% CI=0.61, 1.09). Among warfarin users, median TTR was lower among Medicaid patients (60% vs 68%; P<0.0001; adjusted TTR difference, -2.9; 95% CI=-5.7, -0.2; P=0.04). Use of an NOAC over 2 years of follow-up was not statistically different by insurance. Compared with non-Medicaid patients, Medicaid patients had higher unadjusted rates of mortality, stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleeding; however, these differences were attenuated following adjustment for clinical characteristics.In a contemporary AF cohort, use of OAC overall and use of NOACs were not significantly lower among Medicaid patients relative to others. However, among warfarin users, Medicaid patients spent less time in therapeutic range compared with those with other forms of insurance.

Project description:BackgroundGuidelines recommend warfarin use in patients with atrial fibrillation solely on the basis of risk for ischemic stroke without antithrombotic therapy. These guidelines rely on ischemic stroke rates observed in older trials and do not explicitly account for increased risk for hemorrhage.ObjectiveTo quantify the net clinical benefit of warfarin therapy in a cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation.DesignMixed retrospective and prospective cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation between 1996 and 2003.SettingAn integrated health care delivery system.Patients13 559 adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.MeasurementsWarfarin exposure, patient characteristics, CHADS(2) score (1 point for each of congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, and diabetes and 2 points for stroke), and outcome events were ascertained from health plan records and databases. Net clinical benefit was defined as the annual rate of ischemic strokes and systemic emboli prevented by warfarin minus intracranial hemorrhages attributable to warfarin, multiplied by an impact weight. The base-case impact weight was 1.5, reflecting the greater clinical impact of intracranial hemorrhage versus thromboembolism.ResultsPatients accumulated more than 66 000 person-years of follow-up. The adjusted net clinical benefit of warfarin for the cohort overall was 0.68% per year (95% CI, 0.34% to 0.87%). Adjusted net clinical benefit was greatest for patients with a history of ischemic stroke (2.48% per year [CI, 0.75% to 4.22%]) and for those 85 years or older (2.34% per year [CI, 1.29% to 3.30%]). The net clinical benefit of warfarin increased from essentially zero in CHADS(2) stroke risk categories 0 and 1 to 2.22% per year (CI, 0.58% to 3.75%) in CHADS(2) categories 4 to 6. The patterns of results were preserved when weighting factors for intracranial hemorrhage of 1.0 and 2.0 were used.LimitationsResidual confounding is a possibility. Some outcome events were probably missed by the screening algorithm or when medical records were unavailable.ConclusionExpected net clinical benefit of warfarin therapy is highest among patients with the highest untreated risk for stroke, which includes the oldest age category. Risk assessment that incorporates both risk for thromboembolism and risk for intracranial hemorrhage provides a more quantitatively informed basis for the decision on antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.Primary funding sourceNational Institute on Aging; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and Massachusetts General Hospital.

Dataset Information

One-year clinical outcomes of anticoagulation therapy among Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: The Hyogo AF Network (HAF-NET) Registry.

Publications

One-year clinical outcomes of anticoagulation therapy among Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: The Hyogo AF Network (HAF-NET) Registry.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets