Dataset Information

Updated Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Cabozantinib Integrating Various Cancer Types Including Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: An integrated population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model was used to evaluate the effects of liver dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of cabozantinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and to determine whether clinical dosage adjustment may be necessary in this population. An integrated PPK model previously developed in healthy volunteers and patients with various cancer types was updated with cabozantinib concentration data from hepatocellular carcinoma patients in phase 2 and 3 studies (total 2023; hepatocellular carcinoma 489 patients). Covariate effects of cancer type including hepatocellular carcinoma population and liver dysfunction per the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria were evaluated (normal 1425; mild liver dysfunction 558; moderate/severe liver dysfunction 15/1 patients). With hepatocellular carcinoma patients, PK parameter estimates and covariate effects were similar to the previous PPK model (2 compartments with first- and zero-order absorption and first-order elimination). Only medullary thyroid cancer had appreciable PK differences from healthy volunteers. PK parameter estimates were similar with and without addition of liver dysfunction covariates. Patients with mild liver dysfunction were predicted to have minimal differences in apparent clearance of cabozantinib relative to patients with normal liver function. Therefore, no initial cabozantinib dosage adjustment is recommended for cancer patients with mild liver dysfunction. The small sample size for patients with moderate and severe liver dysfunction limited dosing recommendations in these subpopulations. The results from this PPK analysis were different from those of the single-dose hepatic impairment study in healthy volunteers and more reflective of exposure in cancer patients following daily cabozantinib dosing.

SUBMITTER: Nguyen L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6790584 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Updated Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Cabozantinib Integrating Various Cancer Types Including Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Nguyen Linh L Chapel Sunny S Tran Benjamin Duy BD Lacy Steven S

Journal of clinical pharmacology 20190611 11

An integrated population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model was used to evaluate the effects of liver dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of cabozantinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and to determine whether clinical dosage adjustment may be necessary in this population. An integrated PPK model previously developed in healthy volunteers and patients with various cancer types was updated with cabozantinib concentration data from hepatocellular carcinoma patients in phase 2 and 3 studie ...[more]

PMID: 31187515

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCabozantinib inhibits tyrosine kinases, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, MET, and AXL, which are implicated in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma and the development of resistance to sorafenib, the standard initial treatment for advanced disease. This randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial evaluated cabozantinib as compared with placebo in previously treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.MethodsA total of 707 patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive cabozantinib (60 mg once daily) or matching placebo. Eligible patients had received previous treatment with sorafenib, had disease progression after at least one systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma, and may have received up to two previous systemic regimens for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival and the objective response rate.ResultsAt the second planned interim analysis, the trial showed significantly longer overall survival with cabozantinib than with placebo. Median overall survival was 10.2 months with cabozantinib and 8.0 months with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.92; P=0.005). Median progression-free survival was 5.2 months with cabozantinib and 1.9 months with placebo (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.52; P<0.001), and the objective response rates were 4% and less than 1%, respectively (P=0.009). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 68% of patients in the cabozantinib group and in 36% in the placebo group. The most common high-grade events were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (17% with cabozantinib vs. 0% with placebo), hypertension (16% vs. 2%), increased aspartate aminotransferase level (12% vs. 7%), fatigue (10% vs. 4%), and diarrhea (10% vs. 2%).ConclusionsAmong patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, treatment with cabozantinib resulted in longer overall survival and progression-free survival than placebo. The rate of high-grade adverse events in the cabozantinib group was approximately twice that observed in the placebo group. (Funded by Exelixis; CELESTIAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01908426 .).

Project description:BackgroundNo trials have compared cabozantinib and regorafenib for the second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).ObjectivesConduct a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of the efficacy and safety of second-line cabozantinib and regorafenib in patients with advanced HCC and disease progression after prior sorafenib.MethodsThe CELESTIAL and RESORCE trials were used for indirect comparison of second-line cabozantinib and regorafenib in advanced HCC. Population-level data were available for RESORCE, individual patient data (IPD) for CELESTIAL. To align with RESORCE, the CELESTIAL population was limited to patients who received first-line sorafenib only. To minimize potential effect-modifying population differences, the CELESTIAL IPD were weighted to balance the distribution of clinically relevant baseline characteristics with those of RESORCE. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated for the matching-adjusted second-line CELESTIAL population and compared with those for RESORCE using weighted Kaplan-Meier curves and parametric modeling. Rates of grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) affecting > 5% of patients in any study arm were compared.ResultsIn the matching-adjusted second-line populations (CELESTIAL, effective sample size = 266; RESORCE, n = 573), median (95% confidence interval) OS was similar for cabozantinib and regorafenib (11.4 [8.9-17.0] versus 10.6 [9.1-12.1] months; p = 0.3474, log-rank test). Median PFS was longer for cabozantinib than regorafenib (5.6 [4.9-7.3] versus 3.1 [2.8-4.2] months; p = 0.0005, log-rank test). There was a trend for lower rates of some grade 3/4 TEAEs with regorafenib than with cabozantinib, which may reflect the exclusion of sorafenib-intolerant patients from RESORCE but not from CELESTIAL, a difference that the MAIC methods could not remove. Only diarrhea rates were statistically significantly lower for regorafenib (p ≤ 0.001).ConclusionsCabozantinib may achieve similar OS and prolonged PFS compared with regorafenib in patients with progressive advanced HCC after prior sorafenib.

Dataset Information

Updated Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Cabozantinib Integrating Various Cancer Types Including Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Publications

Updated Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Cabozantinib Integrating Various Cancer Types Including Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets