Dataset Information

Fidelity of Implementation of Prospera Digital: Evaluation of a Multi-Site mHealth Intervention Aimed at Improving Maternal Health Outcomes in Mexico.

ABSTRACT: Background:Infrastructure and human capital limitations motivate the design of mHealth programs, but their large-scale implementation may be challenging in a development context. Prospera Digital (PD) is a pilot mHealth intervention aiming to improve maternal and child health and nutrition designed as a randomized controlled trial with 3 treatment arms. It was implemented during 2015-2017 in 326 treatment clinics located in 5 states in Mexico. Objective:Assess, with an external evaluation, PD's fidelity of implementation using 6 dimensions: adherence, quality, responsiveness, intervention complexity, facilitation strategies, and program differentiation. Methods:Benchmark for implementation was first established by interviewing PD's developers. Extensive fieldwork in the 5 states was then conducted to assess its fidelity in heterogeneous contexts. The evaluation team visited 39 health clinics to assess the initial sign-up events and conduct a follow-up. Overall, the team made 28 closed observations; conducted 17 focus groups; and interviewed 74 health providers, 10 community leaders, and 92 beneficiaries. Field notes from the implementation team on all clinics were also examined. Results:Co-ordination between the Health and Social Development ministries was adequate, although some health providers were not informed about PD. Program developers added useful implementation strategies during roll-out to reinforce sign-up events. Key quality facilitators were the clarity and relevance of the messages from the short messages service. Beneficiaries expressed high satisfaction with PD. In contrast, implementation barriers to adherence in some localities might reduce the potential impact of PD. Program differentiation was low between the 3 treatment arms. Conclusions:PD is a promising strategy to contribute to the promotion of early childhood development in Mexico. Implementation science evaluation can help improve the quality of large-scale mHealth interventions by anticipating barriers and providing insights on how to increase performance. This is especially relevant to inform impact evaluation in development contexts. The trial was registered at the American Economic Association's registry for randomized controlled trials with trial registry number 'AEARCTR-0001035'.

SUBMITTER: Gaitan-Rossi P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6792105 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Fidelity of Implementation of Prospera Digital: Evaluation of a Multi-Site <i>mHealth</i> Intervention Aimed at Improving Maternal Health Outcomes in Mexico.

Gaitán-Rossi Pablo P De la Cerda Lobato Selene S Pérez Navarro Alma Cecilia AC Aguilar Esteva Arturo A Vargas García Manett Rocío MR Vilar-Compte Mireya M

Current developments in nutrition 20191003 10

<h4>Background</h4>Infrastructure and human capital limitations motivate the design of <i>mHealth</i> programs, but their large-scale implementation may be challenging in a development context. Prospera Digital (PD) is a pilot <i>mHealth</i> intervention aiming to improve maternal and child health and nutrition designed as a randomized controlled trial with 3 treatment arms. It was implemented during 2015-2017 in 326 treatment clinics located in 5 states in Mexico.<h4>Objective</h4>Assess, with ...[more]

PMID: 31637367

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAn on-site pharmacist (OSP) intervention was implemented which sought to improve medication management within residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in the Australian Capital Territory, Australia. The objectives of this mixed methods study were to evaluate the implementation fidelity of the OSP intervention and to determine the moderating factors which influenced delivery of this intervention.MethodsThis convergent parallel mixed methods study was underpinned by Hasson's conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation fidelity for seven intervention RACFs was quantitatively assessed using three quantitative data sets: (1) range of OSP intervention activities delivered; (2) random sample of 10% of medication reviews assessed for quality; (3) proportion of residents who received at least one medication review. Semi-structured interviews (n = 14) with managers and OSPs across the intervention RACFs were conducted to identify moderating factors which may have influenced OSP intervention delivery.ResultsThe OSP intervention was generally delivered as intended with overall medium levels of implementation fidelity. This delivery was supported by a range of facilitation strategies with most participants perceiving that the intervention was delivered to a high standard. RACF managers and OSPs were mostly well engaged and responsive. A number of potential barriers (including the part-time OSP role, COVID-19 pandemic, RACFs spread out over a large area with significant distance between resident dwellings) and facilitators (including the pharmacist support meetings, OSPs who took time to establish relationships, RACF managers who actively supported OSPs and worked with them) for OSP intervention delivery were identified which have potential implications for the roll out of OSPs within Australian RACFs.ConclusionIn this study, the implementation fidelity of OSP intervention delivery was assessed with overall medium levels of fidelity found across the intervention RACFs. This suggested that the OSP intervention can generally be delivered as intended in real world RACFs. OSP intervention delivery was influenced by a range of moderating factors, some of which posed barriers and others which facilitated the OSP intervention being delivered as intended.

Project description:Background Implementation of clinical medication reviews in daily practice is scarcely evaluated. The Opti-Med intervention applied a structured approach with external expert teams (pharmacist and physician) to conduct medication reviews. The intervention was effective with respect to resolving drug related problems, but did not improve quality of life. Objective The objective of this process evaluation was to gain more insight into the implementation fidelity of the intervention. Setting Process evaluation alongside a cluster randomized trial in 22 general practices and 518 patients of 65 years and over. Method A mixed methods design using quantitative and qualitative data and the conceptual framework for implementation fidelity was used. Implementation fidelity is defined as the degree to which the various components of an intervention are delivered as intended. Main outcome measure Implementation fidelity for key components of the Opti-Med intervention. Results Patient selection and preparation of the medication analyses were carried out as planned, although mostly by the Opti-Med researchers instead of practice nurses. Medication analyses by expert teams were performed as planned, as well as patient consultations and patient involvement. 48% of the proposed changes in the medication regime were implemented. Cooperation between expert teams members and the use of an online decision-support medication evaluation facilitated implementation. Barriers for implementation were time constraints in daily practice, software difficulties with patient selection and incompleteness of medical files. The degree of embedding of the intervention was found to influence implementation fidelity. The total time investment for healthcare professionals was 94 min per patient. Conclusion Overall, the implementation fidelity was moderate to high for all key components of the Opti-Med intervention. The absence of its effectiveness with respect to quality of life could not be explained by insufficient implementation fidelity.

Project description:BackgroundMost food in the United Kingdom is purchased in supermarkets, and many of these purchases are routinely tracked through supermarket loyalty card data. Using such data may be an effective way to develop remote public health interventions and to measure objectively their effectiveness at changing food purchasing behavior.ObjectiveThe Front-of-pack food Labels: Impact on Consumer Choice (FLICC) study is a pilot randomized controlled trial of a digital behavior change intervention. This pilot trial aimed to collect data on recruitment and retention rates and to provide estimates of effect sizes for the primary outcome (healthiness of ready meals and pizzas purchased) to inform a larger trial.MethodsThe intervention consisted of a website where participants could access tailored feedback on previous purchases of ready meals and pizzas, set goals for behavior change, and model and practice the recommended healthy shopping behavior using traffic light labels. The control consisted of Web-based information on traffic light labeling. Participants were recruited via email from a list of loyalty card holders held by the participating supermarket. All food and drink purchases for the participants for the 6 months before recruitment, during the 6-week intervention period, and during a 12-week washout period were transferred to the research team by the participating supermarket. Healthiness of ready meals and pizzas was measured using a predeveloped scale based solely on the traffic light colors on the foods. Questionnaires were completed at recruitment, end of the intervention, and end of washout to estimate the effect of the intervention on variables that mediate behavior change (eg, belief and intention formation).ResultsWe recruited 496 participants from an initial email to 50,000 people. Only 3 people withdrew from the study, and purchase data were received for all other participants. A total of 208 participants completed all 3 questionnaires. There was no difference in the healthiness of purchased ready meals and pizzas between the intervention and control arms either during the intervention period (P=.32) or at washout (P=.59).ConclusionsAlthough the FLICC study did not find evidence of an impact of the intervention on food purchasing behavior, the unique methods used in this pilot trial are informative for future studies that plan to use supermarket loyalty card data in collaboration with supermarket partners. The experience of the trial showcases the possibilities and challenges associated with the use of loyalty card data in public health research.Trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN19316955; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN19316955 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76IVZ9WjK).International registered report identifier (irrid)RR2-10.1186/s40814-015-0015-1.

Dataset Information

Fidelity of Implementation of Prospera Digital: Evaluation of a Multi-Site mHealth Intervention Aimed at Improving Maternal Health Outcomes in Mexico.

Publications

Fidelity of Implementation of Prospera Digital: Evaluation of a Multi-Site <i>mHealth</i> Intervention Aimed at Improving Maternal Health Outcomes in Mexico.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets