Dataset Information

Assessing and mapping language, attention and executive multidimensional deficits in stroke aphasia.

ABSTRACT: There is growing awareness that aphasia following a stroke can include deficits in other cognitive functions and that these are predictive of certain aspects of language function, recovery and rehabilitation. However, data on attentional and executive (dys)functions in individuals with stroke aphasia are still scarce and the relationship to underlying lesions is rarely explored. Accordingly in this investigation, an extensive selection of standardized non-verbal neuropsychological tests was administered to 38 individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia, in addition to detailed language testing and MRI. To establish the core components underlying the variable patients' performance, behavioural data were explored with rotated principal component analyses, first separately for the non-verbal and language tests, then in a combined analysis including all tests. Three orthogonal components for the non-verbal tests were extracted, which were interpreted as shift-update, inhibit-generate and speed. Three components were also extracted for the language tests, representing phonology, semantics and speech quanta. Individual continuous scores on each component were then included in a voxel-based correlational methodology analysis, yielding significant clusters for all components. The shift-update component was associated with a posterior left temporo-occipital and bilateral medial parietal cluster, the inhibit-generate component was mainly associated with left frontal and bilateral medial frontal regions, and the speed component with several small right-sided fronto-parieto-occipital clusters. Two complementary multivariate brain-behaviour mapping methods were also used, which showed converging results. Together the results suggest that a range of brain regions are involved in attention and executive functioning, and that these non-language domains play a role in the abilities of patients with chronic aphasia. In conclusion, our findings confirm and extend our understanding of the multidimensionality of stroke aphasia, emphasize the importance of assessing non-verbal cognition in this patient group and provide directions for future research and clinical practice. We also briefly compare and discuss univariate and multivariate methods for brain-behaviour mapping.

SUBMITTER: Schumacher R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6794940 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Assessing and mapping language, attention and executive multidimensional deficits in stroke aphasia.

Schumacher Rahel R Halai Ajay D AD Lambon Ralph Matthew A MA

Brain : a journal of neurology 20191001 10

There is growing awareness that aphasia following a stroke can include deficits in other cognitive functions and that these are predictive of certain aspects of language function, recovery and rehabilitation. However, data on attentional and executive (dys)functions in individuals with stroke aphasia are still scarce and the relationship to underlying lesions is rarely explored. Accordingly in this investigation, an extensive selection of standardized non-verbal neuropsychological tests was admi ...[more]

PMID: 31504247

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAphasia is an acquired language impairment following brain damage that affects some or all language modalities: expression and understanding of speech, reading, and writing. Approximately one third of people who have a stroke experience aphasia.ObjectivesTo assess the effects of speech and language therapy (SLT) for aphasia following stroke.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 9 September 2015), CENTRAL (2015, Issue 5) and other Cochrane Library Databases (CDSR, DARE, HTA, to 22 September 2015), MEDLINE (1946 to September 2015), EMBASE (1980 to September 2015), CINAHL (1982 to September 2015), AMED (1985 to September 2015), LLBA (1973 to September 2015), and SpeechBITE (2008 to September 2015). We also searched major trials registers for ongoing trials including ClinicalTrials.gov (to 21 September 2015), the Stroke Trials Registry (to 21 September 2015), Current Controlled Trials (to 22 September 2015), and WHO ICTRP (to 22 September 2015). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished, and ongoing trials we also handsearched the International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders (1969 to 2005) and reference lists of relevant articles, and we contacted academic institutions and other researchers. There were no language restrictions.Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SLT (a formal intervention that aims to improve language and communication abilities, activity and participation) versus no SLT; social support or stimulation (an intervention that provides social support and communication stimulation but does not include targeted therapeutic interventions); or another SLT intervention (differing in duration, intensity, frequency, intervention methodology or theoretical approach).Data collection and analysisWe independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of included trials. We sought missing data from investigators.Main resultsWe included 57 RCTs (74 randomised comparisons) involving 3002 participants in this review (some appearing in more than one comparison). Twenty-seven randomised comparisons (1620 participants) assessed SLT versus no SLT; SLT resulted in clinically and statistically significant benefits to patients' functional communication (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.49, P = 0.01), reading, writing, and expressive language, but (based on smaller numbers) benefits were not evident at follow-up. Nine randomised comparisons (447 participants) assessed SLT with social support and stimulation; meta-analyses found no evidence of a difference in functional communication, but more participants withdrew from social support interventions than SLT. Thirty-eight randomised comparisons (1242 participants) assessed two approaches to SLT. Functional communication was significantly better in people with aphasia that received therapy at a high intensity, high dose, or over a long duration compared to those that received therapy at a lower intensity, lower dose, or over a shorter period of time. The benefits of a high intensity or a high dose of SLT were confounded by a significantly higher dropout rate in these intervention groups. Generally, trials randomised small numbers of participants across a range of characteristics (age, time since stroke, and severity profiles), interventions, and outcomes.Authors' conclusionsOur review provides evidence of the effectiveness of SLT for people with aphasia following stroke in terms of improved functional communication, reading, writing, and expressive language compared with no therapy. There is some indication that therapy at high intensity, high dose or over a longer period may be beneficial. HIgh-intensity and high dose interventions may not be acceptable to all.

Project description:BackgroundThe complex crossing-fiber characteristics in the dual-stream system have been ignored by traditional diffusion tensor models regarding disconnections in post-stroke aphasia. It is valuable to identify microstructural damage of crossing-fiber pathways and reveal accurate fiber-specific language mapping in patients with aphasia.MethodsThis cross-sectional study collected magnetic resonance imaging data from 29 participants with post-stroke aphasia in the subacute stage and from 33 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Fixel-based analysis was performed to examine microstructural fiber density (FD) and bundle cross-section alterations of specific fiber populations in crossing-fiber regions. Group comparisons were performed, and relationships with language scores were assessed.ResultsThe aphasic group exhibited significant fixel-wise FD reductions in the dual-stream tracts, including the left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), arcuate fasciculus, and superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) III (family-wise-error-corrected p < 0.05). Voxel- and fixel-wise comparisons revealed mismatched distributions in regions with crossing-fiber nexuses. Fixel-wise correlation analyses revealed significant associations between comprehension impairment and reduced FD in the temporal and frontal segments of the left IFOF, and also mapped naming ability to the IFOF. Average features along the whole course of dominant tracts assessed with tract-wise analyses attributed word-level comprehension to the IFOF (r = 0.723, p < 0.001) and revealed a trend-level correlation between sentence-level comprehension and FD of the SLF III (r = 0.451, p = 0.021). The mean FD of the uncinate fasciculus (UF) and IFOF correlated with total and picture naming scores, and the IFOF also correlated with responsive naming subdomains (Bonferroni corrected p < 0.05).ConclusionsFD reductions of dual streams suggest that intra-axonal volume reduction constitutes the microstructural damage of white matter integrity in post-stroke aphasia. Fixel-based analysis provides a complementary method of language mapping that identifies fiber-specific tracts in the left hemisphere language network with greater specificity than voxel-based analysis. It precisely locates the precise segments of the IFOF for comprehension, yields fiber-specific evidence for the debated UF-naming association, and reveals dissociative subdomain associations with distinct tracts.

Dataset Information

Assessing and mapping language, attention and executive multidimensional deficits in stroke aphasia.

Publications

Assessing and mapping language, attention and executive multidimensional deficits in stroke aphasia.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure