Dataset Information

Problem-solving training: assessing the feasibility and acceptability of delivering and evaluating a problem-solving training model for front-line prison staff and prisoners who self-harm.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Problem-solving skills training is adaptable, inexpensive and simple to deliver. However, its application with prisoners who self-harm is unknown. The study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a problem-solving training (PST) intervention for prison staff and prisoners who self-harm, to inform the design of a large-scale study.

Design and setting

A mixed-methods design used routinely collected data, individual outcome measures, an economic protocol and qualitative interviews at four prisons in Yorkshire and Humber, UK.

Participants

(i) Front-line prison staff, (ii) male and female prisoners with an episode of self-harm in the previous 2 weeks.

Intervention

The intervention comprised a 1 hour staff training session and a 30 min prisoner session using adapted workbooks and case studies.

Outcomes

We assessed the study processes-coverage of training; recruitment and retention rates and adequacy of intervention delivery-and available data (completeness of outcome data, integrity of routinely collected data and access to the National Health Service (NHS) resource information). Prisoner outcomes assessed incidence of self-harm, quality of life and depression at baseline and at follow-up. Qualitative findings are presented elsewhere.

Results

Recruitment was higher than anticipated for staff n=280, but lower for prisoners, n=48. Retention was good with 43/48 (89%) prisoners completing the intervention, at follow-up we collected individual outcome data for 34/48 (71%) of prisoners. Access to routinely collected data was inconsistent. Prisoners were frequent users of NHS healthcare. The additional cost of training and intervention delivery was deemed minimal in comparison to 'treatment as usual'. Outcome measures of self-harm, quality of life and depression were found to be acceptable.

Conclusions

The intervention proved feasible to adapt. Staff training was delivered but on the whole it was not deemed feasible for staff to deliver the intervention. A large-scale study is warranted, but modifications to the implementation of the intervention are required.

SUBMITTER: Perry A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6797432 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Problem-solving training: assessing the feasibility and acceptability of delivering and evaluating a problem-solving training model for front-line prison staff and prisoners who self-harm.

Perry Amanda A Waterman Mitchell Glenn MG House Allan A Wright-Hughes Alexandra A Greenhalgh Joanne J Farrin Amanda A Richardson Gerry G Hopton Ann Kathryn AK Wright Nat N

BMJ open 20191003 10

<h4>Objectives</h4>Problem-solving skills training is adaptable, inexpensive and simple to deliver. However, its application with prisoners who self-harm is unknown. The study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a problem-solving training (PST) intervention for prison staff and prisoners who self-harm, to inform the design of a large-scale study.<h4>Design and setting</h4>A mixed-methods design used routinely collected data, individual outcome measures, an economic protocol and qualita ...[more]

PMID: 31585968

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionPolicy-makers and practitioners need to understand characteristics associated with support for smoking restrictions to identify both potential allies and groups requiring particular support/targeted communication in the face of restrictions. Using data from prison staff and prisoners, we explored the structure and correlates of opinions relating to prison smoking bans.MethodsQuestionnaires were completed by staff (online, N=1271; 27% return) and prisoners (paper-based, N=2512; 34%) in all 15 Scottish prisons in 2016-17. At that time, prisoners could smoke in their own cells and during outdoor recreation; staff smoking was prohibited anywhere on prison grounds. Staff and prisoner questionnaires included identical/very similar questions about opinions on smoking in prisons and prison smoking bans, own smoking behaviour, health and sociodemographic details. We also measured in every prison fine particulate matter (PM2.5) as a proxy for secondhand smoke (SHS) levels.ResultsPrincipal components analysis identified two factors: 'Positive about bans' (higher scores among staff) and 'Bans will be difficult' (higher scores among prisoners). In multivariable analyses, 'Positive about bans' was associated with: not smoking (both staff and prisoners), better general health, more respiratory symptoms and working in an operational role among staff; and no asthma, more sensory symptoms, higher educational level and status/release date among prisoners. 'Bans will be difficult' was associated with: fewer sensory symptoms and lower prison SHS levels among staff and being a smoker among prisoners. In smoker-only analyses, heavier smokers were less positive about bans and more likely to believe bans will be difficult.ConclusionsResults suggest it is possible to be positive about prison smoking bans whilst also recognising and/or concerned about potential operational difficulties, and that these opinions are associated with several characteristics additional to smoker status. Support for future prison bans may be stronger if staff have access to objective SHS exposure measures.

Project description:BackgroundWhile challenging to provide, prisoners are entitled to healthcare equivalent to community patients. This typically involves them travelling to hospitals for secondary care, whilst adhering to the prison's operational security constraints. Better understanding of equivalence issues this raises may help hospitals and prisons consider how to make services more inclusive and accessible to prisoners. We used prisoners' accounts of secondary care experiences to understand how these relate to the principle of healthcare equivalence.MethodsWe undertook a qualitative interview (n = 17) and focus group (n = 5) study in the English prison estate. Prisoners who had visited acute hospitals for consultations were eligible for participation. They were recruited by peer researchers. 45 people (21 female, 24 male, average age 41) took part across five prisons. Participants were purposively recruited for diversity in gender, age and ethnicity.FindingsExperiences of hospital healthcare were analysed for themes relating to the principle of 'equivalence of care' using Framework Analysis. Participants described five experiences challenging 'equivalence of care' for prisoners: (1) Security overriding healthcare need or experience (2) Security creating public humiliation and fear (3) Difficulties relating to prison officer's role in medical consultations (4) Delayed access due to prison regime and transport requirements and (5) Patient autonomy restricted in management of their own healthcare.InterpretationAchieving equivalence of care for prisoners is undermined by fear, stigma, reduced autonomy and security requirements. It requires co-ordinated action from commissioners, managers, and providers of prison and healthcare systems to address these barriers. There is a need for frontline prison and healthcare staff to address stigma and ensure they understand common issues faced by prisoners seeking to access healthcare, while developing strategies which empower the autonomy of prisoners' healthcare decisions.

Dataset Information

Problem-solving training: assessing the feasibility and acceptability of delivering and evaluating a problem-solving training model for front-line prison staff and prisoners who self-harm.

Objectives

Design and setting

Participants

Intervention

Outcomes

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Problem-solving training: assessing the feasibility and acceptability of delivering and evaluating a problem-solving training model for front-line prison staff and prisoners who self-harm.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets