Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A Practical Two-Stage Frailty Assessment for Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:Despite evidence, frailty is not routinely assessed before cardiac surgery. We compared five brief frailty tests for predicting poor outcomes after aortic valve replacement and evaluated a strategy of performing comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in screen-positive patients. DESIGN:Prospective cohort study. SETTING:A single academic center. PARTICIPANTS:Patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) (n = 91; mean age = 77.8 y) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n = 137; mean age = 84.5 y) from February 2014 to June 2017. MEASUREMENTS:Brief frailty tests (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness, and Loss of weight [FRAIL] scale; Clinical Frailty Scale; grip strength; gait speed; and chair rise) and a deficit-accumulation frailty index based on CGA (CGA-FI) were measured at baseline. A composite of death or functional decline and severe symptoms at 6 months was assessed. RESULTS:The outcome occurred in 8.8% (n = 8) after SAVR and 24.8% (n = 34) after TAVR. The chair rise test showed the highest discrimination in the SAVR (C statistic = .76) and TAVR cohorts (C statistic = .63). When the chair rise test was chosen as a screening test (?17?s for SAVR and??23?s for TAVR), the incidence of outcome for screen-negative patients, screen-positive patients with CGA-FI of .34 or lower, and screen-positive patients with CGA-FI higher than .34 were 1.9% (n = 1/54), 5.3% (n = 1/19), and 33.3% (n = 6/18) after SAVR, respectively, and 15.0% (n = 9/60), 14.3% (n = 3/21), and 38.3% (n = 22/56) after TAVR, respectively. Compared with routinely performing CGA, targeting CGA to screen-positive patients would result in 54 fewer CGAs, without compromising sensitivity (routine vs targeted: .75 vs .75; P = 1.00) and specificity (.84 vs .86; P = 1.00) in the SAVR cohort; and 60 fewer CGAs with lower sensitivity (.82 vs.65; P = .03) and higher specificity (.50 vs .67; P?

SUBMITTER: Hosler QP 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6800747 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A Practical Two-Stage Frailty Assessment for Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement.

Hosler Quinn P QP   Maltagliati Anthony J AJ   Shi Sandra M SM   Afilalo Jonathan J   Popma Jeffrey J JJ   Khabbaz Kamal R KR   Laham Roger J RJ   Guibone Kimberly K   Kim Dae Hyun DH  

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 20190618 10


<h4>Objectives</h4>Despite evidence, frailty is not routinely assessed before cardiac surgery. We compared five brief frailty tests for predicting poor outcomes after aortic valve replacement and evaluated a strategy of performing comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in screen-positive patients.<h4>Design</h4>Prospective cohort study.<h4>Setting</h4>A single academic center.<h4>Participants</h4>Patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) (n = 91; mean age = 77.8 y) or transc  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9293424 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7455771 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10051559 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5885887 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8753386 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10332651 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7927377 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3717525 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8200421 | biostudies-literature