Dataset Information

Multidisciplinary Chronic Kidney Disease Clinic Practices: A Scoping Review.

ABSTRACT: Background:Multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinics improve patient outcomes but their optimal design is unclear. Objective:To perform a scoping review to identify and describe current practices (structure, function) associated with multidisciplinary CKD clinics. Design:Scoping review. Setting:Databases included Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and CINAHL. Patients:Patients followed in multidisciplinary CKD clinics globally. Measurements:Multidisciplinary CKD clinic composition, entry criteria, follow-up, and outcomes. Methods:We systematically searched the literature to identify randomized controlled trials, non-randomized interventional studies, or observational studies of multidisciplinary CKD clinics defined by an outpatient setting where two or more allied health members (with or without a nephrologist) provided longitudinal care to 50 or more adult or pediatric patients with CKD. Included studies were from 2002 to present. Searches were completed on August 10, 2018. Title, abstracts, and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third. We abstracted data from included studies to summarize multidisciplinary CKD clinic team composition, entry criteria, follow-up, and processes. Results:40 studies (8 randomized controlled trials and 32 non-randomized interventional studies or observational studies) involving 23?230 individuals receiving multidisciplinary CKD care in 12 countries were included. Thirty-eight focused on adults (27 with CKD, 10 incident dialysis patients, one conservative therapy) while two studies focused on adolescents or children with CKD. The multidisciplinary team included a mean of 4.6 (SD 1.5) members consisting of a nephrologist, nurse, dietician, social worker, and pharmacist in 97.4%, 86.8%, 84.2%, 57.9%, and 42.1% of studies respectively. Entry criteria to multidisciplinary CKD clinics ranged from glomerular filtration rates of 20 to 70 mL/min/1.73m2 or CKD stages 1 to 5 without any proteinuria or risk equation-based criteria. Frequency of follow-up was variable by severity of kidney disease. Team member roles and standardized operating procedures were infrequently reported. Limitations:Unstandardized definition of multidisciplinary CKD care, studies limited to CKD defined by glomerular filtration rate, and lack of representation from countries other than Canada, Taiwan, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Conclusions:There is heterogeneity in multidisciplinary CKD team composition, entry criteria, follow-up, and processes with inadequate reporting of this complex intervention. Additional research is needed to determine the best model for multidisciplinary CKD clinics. Trial registration:Not applicable.

SUBMITTER: Collister D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6801876 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Multidisciplinary Chronic Kidney Disease Clinic Practices: A Scoping Review.

Collister David D Pyne Lonnie L Cunningham Jessie J Donald Maoliosa M Molnar Amber A Beaulieu Monica M Levin Adeera A Brimble K Scott KS

Canadian journal of kidney health and disease 20191018

<h4>Background</h4>Multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinics improve patient outcomes but their optimal design is unclear.<h4>Objective</h4>To perform a scoping review to identify and describe current practices (structure, function) associated with multidisciplinary CKD clinics.<h4>Design</h4>Scoping review.<h4>Setting</h4>Databases included Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and CINAHL.<h4>Patients</h4>Patients followed in multidisciplinary CKD clinics globally.<h4>Measurements</h4>Multidi ...[more]

PMID: 31666978

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Canadian Indigenous populations experience significantly more chronic kidney disease (CKD) than the general population. Indigenous people who live in rural and remote areas may also have difficulty accessing both information and care for their CKD. Informed decision making about treatment options for advancing kidney disease may be delayed, which can result in poor health outcomes and decreased quality of life. Moreover, Indigenous people may experience marginalization within Western health care systems. Objective:The objective of this scoping review is to identify culturally appropriate and co-developed Indigenous educational tools that will ultimately support CKD learning and end-stage kidney treatment decision making. Design:Scoping Review. Setting:Databases included Embase, CINAHL, Medline (OVID), ERIC, and the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology Gray Matters. Study Participants:Community-based Indigenous patients, families, health care workers, and community members. Methods:We systematically reviewed the literature to explore the availability of co-developed Indigenous educational tools and material for CKD treatment options. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed independently by 2 reviewers with disagreements resolved through a third. All aspects of this project, including searching the databases were done in consultation with an Indigenous Elder. Results:Only one retrieved article identified a comprehensive CKD tool co-developed by researchers, health care providers, and an Indigenous community. Three themes emerged from the scoping review that may inform characteristics of co-developed tools: cultural appropriateness; appraisal of utility and effectiveness and; content informed by co-development of traditional and Western chronic disease knowledge. Limitations:Consistent with scoping review methodology, the methodological quality of included studies was not assessed. In addition, it was difficult to synthesize the findings from the research and gray literature. Conclusion:Little is known about the co-development of Indigenous educational tools for CKD. Further in-depth understanding is required about how to best engage with Indigenous communities, specifically to co-develop contextualized CKD tools that are acceptable to Indigenous people.Trial registration: Not applicable as this review described secondary data.

Project description:ObjectiveTo systematically identify and describe self-management interventions for adult patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).SettingCommunity-based.ParticipantsAdults with CKD stages 1-5 (not requiring kidney replacement therapy).InterventionsSelf-management strategies for adults with CKD.Primary and secondary outcome measuresUsing a scoping review, electronic databases and grey literature were searched in October 2016 to identify self-management interventions for adults with CKD stages 1-5 (not requiring kidney replacement therapy). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, qualitative and mixed method studies were included and study selection and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. Outcomes included behaviours, cognitions, physiological measures, symptoms, health status and healthcare.ResultsFifty studies (19 RCTs, 7 quasi-experimental, 5 observational, 13 pre-post intervention, 1 mixed method and 5 qualitative) reporting 45 interventions were included. The most common intervention topic was diet/nutrition and interventions were regularly delivered face to face. Interventions were administered by a variety of providers, with nursing professionals the most common health professional group. Cognitions (ie, changes in general CKD knowledge, perceived self-management and motivation) were the most frequently reported outcome domain that showed improvement. Less than 1% of the interventions were co-developed with patients and 20% were based on a theory or framework.ConclusionsThere was a wide range of self-management interventions with considerable variability in outcomes for adults with CKD. Major gaps in the literature include lack of patient engagement in the design of the interventions, with the majority of interventions not applying a behavioural change theory to inform their development. This work highlights the need to involve patients to co-developed and evaluate a self-management intervention based on sound theories and clinical evidence.

Project description:IntroductionPatient education is a crucial component in the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, many education programmes do not tailor to patients' disease-related belief and emotional reactions. According to Leventhal's self-regulation model, such beliefs and reactions, known as illness perceptions, are a part of patients' understanding of their disease and treatment-related actions. The existing research of illness perception in the field of nephrology has been heterogenous in terms of study outcomes and in study population; and the evidence of how illness perceptions affect behavioural and decisional outcomes is limited. This scoping review aims to map and summarise the evidence of published literature on illness perception among patients with CKD not yet treated by dialysis and kidney failure.Methods and analysisThis study bases its approach on Joanna Brigg's Institute Guidelines on scoping review methods. The search strategy was developed together with a medical information specialist. Searches will be performed on acceptance of publication in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO via Ovid, Scopus and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Searches will be run without incorporating a date restriction in order to capture content from the databases' inception to present day. Search terms including 'illness perception', 'kidney disease' and 'kidney failure' will be screened in titles and abstracts. Two independent researchers will screen the abstracts and full text for full eligibility. We will include studies focusing on illness perception of patients with CKD with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, kidney failure or recipients of kidney transplant. We will exclude patients <18 years of age, patients with acute kidney injury and non-English articles. All demographic data, study design and study findings will be collected and analysed using a data abstraction tool.Ethics and disseminationThis study does not require internal review board approval. We will present the findings of this scoping review in a peer-reviewed journal.

Project description:ObjectiveTo provide a review of prediction models that have been used to measure clinical or pathological progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD).DesignScoping review.Data sourcesMedline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus from the year 2011 to 17th February 2022.Study selectionAll English written studies that are published in peer-reviewed journals in any country, that developed at least a statistical or computational model that predicted the risk of CKD progression.Data extractionEligible studies for full text review were assessed on the methods that were used to predict the progression of CKD. The type of information extracted included: the author(s), title of article, year of publication, study dates, study location, number of participants, study design, predicted outcomes, type of prediction model, prediction variables used, validation assessment, limitations and implications.ResultsFrom 516 studies, 33 were included for full-text review. A qualitative analysis of the articles was compared following the extracted information. The study populations across the studies were heterogenous and data acquired by the studies were sourced from different levels and locations of healthcare systems. 31 studies implemented supervised models, and 2 studies included unsupervised models. Regardless of the model used, the predicted outcome included measurement of risk of progression towards end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) of related definitions, over given time intervals. However, there is a lack of reporting consistency on details of the development of their prediction models.ConclusionsResearchers are working towards producing an effective model to provide key insights into the progression of CKD. This review found that cox regression modelling was predominantly used among the small number of studies in the review. This made it difficult to perform a comparison between ML algorithms, more so when different validation methods were used in different cohort types. There needs to be increased investment in a more consistent and reproducible approach for future studies looking to develop risk prediction models for CKD progression.

Project description:BackgroundOne of the key components of multidisciplinary CKD clinics is education; however, kidney disease knowledge among patients followed in these clinics is not routinely measured.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine objective and perceived kidney disease knowledge and patient characteristics associated with knowledge among patients followed in a multi-care kidney clinic.DesignThis is a cross-sectional survey study.SettingThis study was conducted in a multi-care kidney clinic in Ontario, Canada.PatientsPatients who did not speak English, who were unable to read due to significant vision impairment, or who had a known history of dementia or significant cognitive impairment were excluded.MeasurementsPerceived kidney disease knowledge was evaluated using a previously validated 9-item survey (PiKS). Each question on the perceived knowledge survey had 4 possible responses, ranging from "I don't know anything" (1) to "I know a lot" (4). Objective kidney disease knowledge was evaluated using a previously validated survey (KiKS).MethodsThe association between patient characteristics and perceived and objective kidney disease knowledge was determined using linear regression.ResultsA total of 125 patients were included, 57% were male, the mean (SD) age and eGFR were 66 (13) years and 16 (5.9) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The median (IQR) objective and perceived knowledge survey scores were 19 out of 27 (16, 21) and 2.9 out of 4 (2.4, 3.2), respectively. Only 25% of patients answered correctly that CKD can be associated with no symptoms, and 64% of patients identified correctly that the kidneys make urine. More than 60% of patients perceived themselves to know nothing or only a little about medications that help or hurt the kidney. Older age was independently associated with lower perceived and objective knowledge, but sex, income, and educational attainment were not.LimitationsThis is a single-center study. Cognitive impairment was based on the treating team's informal assessment or prior documentation in the chart; formal cognitive testing was not performed as part of this study.ConclusionsDespite resource-intensive care, CKD knowledge of patients followed in a multidisciplinary clinic was found to be modest. Whether enhanced educational strategies can improve knowledge and whether increasing knowledge improves patient outcomes warrants further study.

Dataset Information

Multidisciplinary Chronic Kidney Disease Clinic Practices: A Scoping Review.

Publications

Multidisciplinary Chronic Kidney Disease Clinic Practices: A Scoping Review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets