Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
We investigated the surgical feasibility, safety and effectiveness of 50?W (low power) Holmium Laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients who have undergone previous template biopsy of the prostate (TPB).Methods
Data encompassing pre-operative baseline characteristics, intra-operative measures and post-operative outcomes was collected for 109 patients undergoing HoLEP across two UK centres. Patients were stratified into two groups; group 1 (n?=?24) had undergone previous TPB were compared with 'controls' (no previous TPB) in group 2 (n?=?85). The primary outcome was successful HoLEP.Results
There were no statistically significant differences in either key baseline characteristics or mass of prostate enucleated between groups 1 and 2. There was no statistically significant difference in enucleation or morcellation times parameters between the two groups other than enucleation efficiency in favour of group 1 (p?=?0.024). Functional outcomes improved, without any statistically significant difference, in both groups.Conclusions
In patients with a previous TPB, HoLEP is surgically feasible, safe and effective. TPB should not be considered a contraindication to HoLEP. Our work provides a strong foundation for further research in this area.
SUBMITTER: Bell C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6805368 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Bell Chris C Moore Sacha L SL Gill Amarit A Obi-Njoku Obinna O Hughes Stephen F SF Saleemi Asad A Ellis Gidon G Khan Farooq F Shergill Iqbal S IS
BMC urology 20191022 1
<h4>Background</h4>We investigated the surgical feasibility, safety and effectiveness of 50 W (low power) Holmium Laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients who have undergone previous template biopsy of the prostate (TPB).<h4>Methods</h4>Data encompassing pre-operative baseline characteristics, intra-operative measures and post-operative outcomes was collected for 109 patients undergoing HoLEP across two UK centres. Patients were stratified into two groups; group 1 (n = 24) had under ...[more]